Gary Johnson Embarrassing Gary Johnson Political Ad

[DerailingDaTrain]

I was ridiculing GJ ads before it was cool

/hipster

 

[Revolution9]

I have been coming across information that points to Gary Johnson being a Rockefeller. Makes total sense to me., They always gotta have a co-opter in the game.



Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

I agree. What's with the goofy dancing dude?

Because he ain't serious and never was. He appears from digging deep that he is of the Rockefellers bloodlines. His mission was to co-opt and divert the power of the Liberty movement as created by RP and us. They seem to have the notion all we care about is marijuana. I don't need anyone's bloody permission to do what comes natural.

Rev9

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

Because he ain't serious and never was. He appears from digging deep that he is of the Rockefellers bloodlines. His mission was to co-opt and divert the power of the Liberty movement as created by RP and us. They seem to have the notion all we care about is marijuana. I don't need anyone's bloody permission to do what comes natural.

Rev9

Care to share with the rest of us how you came to this conclusion?

 

[Nathan Hale]

I have been coming across information that points to Gary Johnson being a Rockefeller. Makes total sense to me., They always gotta have a co-opter in the game.



Rev9

That's just retarded. Perhaps you'll get a nice candid of Gary Johnson in a black helicopter descending to the landing pad at Bohemian Grove for the next Bilderberg gathering. I'll meet you at the bunker, comrade.

 

[BamaAla]

It was different; that's for sure. They could have hired someone that could actually dance though.

 

[TheTexan]

I could give you a dozen reasons why Gary Johnson is shitty, but I only need one. He doesn't want to end the Fed. He thinks it needs to be "managed better."

Fuck. That.

 

[Revolution9]

That's just retarded. Perhaps you'll get a nice candid of Gary Johnson in a black helicopter descending to the landing pad at Bohemian Grove for the next Bilderberg gathering. I'll meet you at the bunker, comrade.

Har de har har. When you clowns gonna get some new material? I came across some photos of a Rockefeller nephew from years back with Gary Johnson in them and a short blurb about his relationship to the family. I am trying to dig up more. I haven't had time but a geneaology chart for his bloodlines would be in order. New Mexico is a drug trafficking hub. Just sayin'.

Rev9

 

[DerailingDaTrain]

Har de har har. When you clowns gonna get some new material? I came across some photos of a Rockefeller nephew from years back with Gary Johnson in them and a short blurb about his relationship to the family. I am trying to dig up more. I haven't had time but a geneaology chart for his bloodlines would be in order. New Mexico is a drug trafficking hub. Just sayin'.

Rev9

lol

You don't actually believe this do you?

 

[FindLiberty]

IMO,

I wouldn't pay to broadcast it, but not too bad overall. It lacked supporting facts and explanation.

Squirm factor: That video in the OP caused me far less personal discomfort than seeing "Elektable" did.

 

[HardyMacia]

I could give you a dozen reasons why Gary Johnson is shitty, but I only need one. He doesn't want to end the Fed. He thinks it needs to be "managed better."

Johnson does want to end the fed. It's been his position since the start, but the difference is that he doesn't work it into every answer like Paul.

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

Johnson does want to end the fed. It's been his position since the start, but the difference is that he doesn't work it into every answer like Paul.

Not so fast, my friend. From an RLC interview in 2010:

The Federal Reserve deserves full responsibility for the housing bubble and as well deserves credit for mitigating the bust [ed. note: uhh... what?]. Overriding that, the dollar is now worth a nickel. I understand the arguments for a free market in money and I support them. I shy away from the phrase “regulate the Fed” because I do not want Barney Frank deciding monetary policy. I wouldn’t say the Fed needs to be abolished. I understand the argument for a gold standard, though. The US government should be pursuing a strong dollar policy, which the Fed hasn’t done.

He also said, in 2011, on Freedom Watch, that we don't need to end the Fed. It was the same interview in which he said he opposes closing Gitmo.

 

[TheTexan]

Johnson does want to end the fed. It's been his position since the start, but the difference is that he doesn't work it into every answer like Paul.

Why would you link that video? How does that support your case? All that video says that he wants to replace the income tax with the revenue neutral Fair Tax. All this does is redistribute how the taxes are collected. I'd love to not have to fill out forms each year, but other than that, it changes nothing.

Your video is completely irrelevant. It has nothing to do with the Fed.

Gary Johnson consistently says that he thinks the Fed should be managed better. He very often demonstrates a lack of understanding of why we want to end the Fed, and he rarely talks about the Fed, even when given the opportunity. When he does speak on it, his rhetoric is limited to short talking points stolen directly from Ron Paul.

I believe he is disingenuous and pandering, and I don't trust him, not one bit. The only reason his supporters aren't on my wall of shame is because people like you still think he wants to end the fed. I assure you, he does not.

He said he would "not veto" an end the fed bill, but fuck, man, can't you see pandering bullshit when it's right in front of you?

 

[HardyMacia]

oops, the correct video...

 

[TheTexan]

oops, the correct video...

edit: This video changes nothing... we all know he wants to audit the fed, this doesn't mention ending it at all

 

[HardyMacia]

No for arguing about the Fed...just as Ron Paul says we need to audit the fed. Johnson says we need to audit the fed. Paul says we should have competing currencies. Johnson says we should have competing currencies. Paul says we should to end the fed. Johnson says we should end the fed.

The difference is that Johnson shows more depth than Paul on this issue, because we can end the fed, but congress will just have the treasury continue to print and inflate the money supply. The top priority (while ending the fed should still be a priority), but the top priority is getting spending under control and Johnson focuses on that.

Johnson calls for a balanced budget in 2013. Paul in 2015.
Johnson's budget submission to congress in 2013 will cut 40% more than Paul's budget.
Johnson promises to veto all expenditure that exceed revenues. Paul does not.

Yes, the fed is an issue, but it will literally "take an act of congress" to abolish it. Balancing the budget the President can make great strides in moving us toward a balanced budget immediately.

 

[TheTexan]

Wait... hold on a second. The one line in that video that really caught my attention that I liked was

"He'll End The Federal Reserve Funny Money Scam."

and then the NEXT slide is

"And Open the FED to Public Scrutiny and Control"


I take back my earlier statement that it's pandering in the right direction. It's pandering in the same direction. He wants Control of the Fed, and not to end it. I don't know how much more proof you need

 

[TheTexan]

Johnson says we should have competing currencies.

References?

 

[Feeding the Abscess]

No for arguing about the Fed...just as Ron Paul says we need to audit the fed. Johnson says we need to audit the fed. Paul says we should have competing currencies. Johnson says we should have competing currencies. Paul says we should to end the fed. Johnson says we should end the fed.

The difference is that Johnson shows more depth than Paul on this issue, because we can end the fed, but congress will just have the treasury continue to print and inflate the money supply. The top priority (while ending the fed should still be a priority), but the top priority is getting spending under control and Johnson focuses on that.

Johnson calls for a balanced budget in 2013. Paul in 2015.
Johnson's budget submission to congress in 2013 will cut 40% more than Paul's budget.
Johnson promises to veto all expenditure that exceed revenues. Paul does not.

Yes, the fed is an issue, but it will literally "take an act of congress" to abolish it. Balancing the budget the President can make great strides in moving us toward a balanced budget immediately.

Wrong, of course Ron Paul has said he'd balance all legislation that spent more money than we had.

And LOL at Johnson having more depth on monetary and fiscal issues.

Support Johnson all you want. He's way better than Romney and Obama. But don't act like he's an anti-Fed warrior.

 

[TheTexan]

The difference is that Johnson shows more depth than Paul on this issue, because we can end the fed, but congress will just have the treasury continue to print and inflate the money supply.

I can see why you like Johnson. You don't understand ending the Fed.

Here's a hint, to get you started on your hopefully enlightening intellectual journey: competing currencies

And btw, I'm not trying to sound rude, but you have been here long enough that you should "get it" by now.