Elizabeth Warren leading in polls... SERIOUSLY?

It's irrelevant in the scheme of things. Look at the big picture.
You're both right. The fact that this woman lied so easily, and for such a reason SHOULD rule her out for any public position. However, in today's 'my team vs your team' version of politics, scruples dignity and principles really aren't such a main concern. Sad, but true.
 
Yeah, I watched the debate and she is terrible. Basically an Obama-clone "fair share, raise taxes millionaires and billionaires, invest in education green-energy, oil companies make billions in profit, you didn't build that blah blah blah".

Yeah, Scott Brown is not great but he's the best we can do here in Massachusetts, sadly. At least he doesn't want to raise taxes.

And if she gets in she'll be Senator for life just like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.

If Obama is going to be re-elected I want to make sure the republicans have a majority in the Senate. I'll be holding my nose and voting for Brown in November.

I still think he will end up winning.
 
Last edited:
From what I heard on some radio show, she was a fresh new voice who came out AGAINST the banker class, which says a lot for the rancor you hear about her from the neocons. It seems she's "anti-corporatist" whereas her opponent is "pro-corporatist."

That was my impression too. Scott Brown doesn't strike me as any better on any other issues.
 
From what I heard on some radio show, she was a fresh new voice who came out AGAINST the banker class, which says a lot for the rancor you hear about her from the neocons. It seems she's "anti-corporatist" whereas her opponent is "pro-corporatist."

Yes, by "more regulation", more Dodd-Frank type bills, more agencies and bureaucracies, ever hear of the "Consumer Protection Agency" ? That group of un-elected bureaucrats that are not even financed by congress but directly by the Federal Reserve? She was its chief mastermind.

And she's all for doing "whatever it take to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon", "all options on the table" etc. Those are actual quotes.

She is for more regulation, higher taxes, more centralization, higher spending, more debt, status-quo foreign policy, status-quo monetary policy etc.

Don't be fooled.
 
Last edited:
Meh. Scott Brown isn't really a republican anyway. Does this mean Mitt Romney will lose his home state? I would LOL so hard if he did!
 
Meh. Scott Brown isn't really a republican anyway. Does this mean Mitt Romney will lose his home state? I would LOL so hard if he did!

Mitt was always going to lose in Massachusetts. Its not even in play really. MA will go to Obama.
 
Meh. Scott Brown isn't really a republican anyway. Does this mean Mitt Romney will lose his home state? I would LOL so hard if he did!

Matt already said it, it was never a question, he is going to lose Mass by double digits.

Why the surprise?

This is the state that sent Ted Kennedy and Barney Frwank back to DC decade after decade.
 
Stunning. A woman lies about her minority status and the so-called party of diversity gives her a free pass. Could you imagine the outrage if a Republican had done the same thing? They'd be screaming 'racisit' at the top of their lungs. My grandfather is fullblood American Indian. I had the opportunity to receive minority-based scholarships but I refused because such things should be awarded based on personal accomplishments, not things we are born into. And yet this bitch lies, gets caught, and doesn't get punished. Fuck her.
 
starting from the top --- she's going for Teddy Kennedy's seat and has more people skills than our A.G. Martha Coakley did.
there are two Democrats party registered for every Republican and the number of independents is equal to the number of GOP
people, each Republican NEEDS indies and a few Democrats to make any dent in the party that usually wins our elections. Our
GOP contenders when going at it up here can be 3 degrees to the left of Mitt Romney or 15 degrees to the right of his more
recent stances and this does not really change how badly they can be smucked by. Scott Brown is being percieved as a really
nice guy and this has helped him. I'd call Wednesday's debate a draw and yes, all the Baystaters at the DNC helped solidify her
in the eyes of our voters as somebody of importance. When Bill Clinton countered Christy of NJ and galvanized the DNC it had
given her the confortable boost that says the election is hers to loose. Scott Brown is a GOP moderate in terms of his votes.
 
Last edited:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/17/elizabeth-warren-scott-brown_n_1889660.html?ref=topbar

Don't people pay attention? The bitch got caught LYING about being a native American and these fucking lemmings just ignore it? Or don't people even know? Are they uninformed or just don't care?

It's Massachusetts. Hiawatha Warren has a huge built in advantage. She'd have to be a complete screw up to lose (like the awful candidate Brown beat to begin with).

While she is clearly an inept politicians, she may not be a big enough screw up to lose this "gimme" election.

Remember, these people voted for Ted Kennedy decade after decade after decade...
 
The PURPOSE of democracy is Power to the Sociopaths.

I would like to see her get a real job, with real authority and see what she does with it. A congressman is just another unaccountable position that anyone can do, and if you suck at it, nobody will ever know.
 
Mitt was always going to lose in Massachusetts. Its not even in play really. MA will go to Obama.

Matt already said it, it was never a question, he is going to lose Mass by double digits.

Why the surprise?

This is the state that sent Ted Kennedy and Barney Frwank back to DC decade after decade.

Yeah, but you're expected to win your home state. Georgia isn't liberal by any stretch of the imagination, but Jimmy Carter still carried it in 1980. It was a major loss of face for Al Gore to lose Tennessee in 2000.
 
Whenever you see a turd sandwich leading in a well covered race like in MA, there is always a bigger, smellier, more slimy turd sandwhich beside it. Sorry but when you give people the option between a liberal and a RINO, they will choose the authentic liberal 90% of the time
 
Yeah, but you're expected to win your home state. Georgia isn't liberal by any stretch of the imagination, but Jimmy Carter still carried it in 1980. It was a major loss of face for Al Gore to lose Tennessee in 2000.

I guess in the 80s candidates actually spent time in their "home town" after college other than a few years during stints as gov.
 
Whenever you see a turd sandwich leading in a well covered race like in MA, there is always a bigger, smellier, more slimy turd sandwhich beside it. Sorry but when you give people the option between a liberal and a RINO, they will choose the authentic liberal 90% of the time

You can't be republican senator from MA without being a RINO. Do you really blame him? He's being attacked for being TOO CONSERVATIVE.

If you stray anymore than a few feet to the right of Joseph Stalin our idiot electorate here in Massachusetts will just replace you with someone more liberal.
 
Back
Top