Mikeforpaul
Member
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2007
- Messages
- 70
I hope she runs for the entertainment of it. She'd make Rick Perry look presidential!
Elizabeth Warren exploring a 2016 bid
- Thread starter RPfan1992
- Start date
-
- Tags
- elizabeth warren
matt0611
Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 3,749
"We cannot let Iran have a nuclear weapon" - Warren in a Senate debate
No.
There's nothing positive about this woman. Nothing. She's Obama x2.
So just stop it right now with the "she might be good on this or that" bullshit.
She would easily be the worst President we've ever had, and that's saying something.
I hope she runs though. Would love to see Rand vs Warren.
Yup. She's terrible all around. She's even anti-legalization of marijuana. So seriously guys, stop complimenting this progressive piece of crap.
Last edited:
RonPaulFanInGA
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 12,749
supermario21
Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2012
- Messages
- 4,060
Really?? Good on foreign policy? Where was she during Rand's filibuster? I'm sick of hearing this BS about how Dems are good on foreign policy. Other than Kucinich and to a lesser extent Ron Wyden, every Democrat is just as bad as most neocon Republicans.
seyferjm
Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 843
JorgeStevenson
Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2011
- Messages
- 186
She's on the cutting edge of what the word "liberal" has been morphing into since Obama took office. Basically, the majority of liberals have stopped any and all pushes on the civil liberties and wars issues, since they can't get any traction on those issues with Obama in office. So now they basically solely focus on income inequality and the middle class. Why income inequality? Because it's an easy issue to demagogue. Why the middle class? Because that's the class most people are in (if they focused on the lower class, which would actually make more sense, it wouldn't appeal to very many people).
So, in summary she is a progressive except on issues like marijuana, drones, wars, etc. You know, the only things we ever really had in common with the fringe lefties.
So, in summary she is a progressive except on issues like marijuana, drones, wars, etc. You know, the only things we ever really had in common with the fringe lefties.
Krzysztof Lesiak
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 681
I'd rather have Hillary run. She'd be easier for Rand to beat.
Warren's the idiot that wants to raise the minimum wage to $20, right?
Warren's the idiot that wants to raise the minimum wage to $20, right?
Krzysztof Lesiak
Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2012
- Messages
- 681
Yes Dennis Kucinich is awesome. Only Democrat I'd ever vote for.
Most are worse.
Not me , one commie gun grabber is the same as the next .....
RabbitMan
Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2011
- Messages
- 1,046
She is a typical progressive firebrand. What has she done that pisses you off in a crony capitalist, corrupt fashion?
When the political discourse changes from "I can't trust them, they are just saying what they want me to hear," to "I don't agree with their philosophy of government, and here is why," I think that is a win-win for America.
Instead of a battle of personalities we get a conversation about ideas and usually...I think the best ideas will win in the end!
When the political discourse changes from "I can't trust them, they are just saying what they want me to hear," to "I don't agree with their philosophy of government, and here is why," I think that is a win-win for America.
Instead of a battle of personalities we get a conversation about ideas and usually...I think the best ideas will win in the end!
Last edited:
Giuliani was there on 911
Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2007
- Messages
- 554
Did Rand say he's okay with Iran getting a nuclear weapon ?
whoisjohngalt
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 1,314
Don't think she can beat Hillary, but hopefully she can make it a protracted primary with plenty of mud slinging.
I echo the sentiment that we should be pulling for her. Not because she is decent on policy (shes horrible on every single issue so far as I can tell) but because she would make a President Paul much more likely.
I echo the sentiment that we should be pulling for her. Not because she is decent on policy (shes horrible on every single issue so far as I can tell) but because she would make a President Paul much more likely.
whoisjohngalt
Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 1,314
He said he wouldn't rule out containment because that is preemptively committing to war. He didn't say he's OK with it but you are making a false equivocation.
Last edited:
gwax23
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2012
- Messages
- 1,896
22...
"But guuuyyysss she hates banks and might be good on capitalism!!!! Shes soo cool and she really believes what shes saying what more can we ask for guys?"
First banks arent bad, the federal reserve is. Private banks are a major part of a capitalist society we shouldnt hate the concept of banks and banking because of the federal reserve and its puppet banks on wallstreet.
Second even if she really does believe what shes saying all that means is she is a enthusiastic idiot. God some of you guys have really low standards.
anaconda
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 19,403
Not so sure. Look at the comments on this Yahoo story...
http://news.yahoo.com/elizabeth-warren-already-eyeing-2016-white-house-bid-185628948.html
anaconda
Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2007
- Messages
- 19,403
How can we compete when the following is sure to be her 2016 campaign theme:
juleswin
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 14,245
I propose before you bash this woman, at least give 2 policies of hers that you do not like. If some people have said she would be worse than the devil as a President. Please so tell us why you think that way.
For me, I do not like her because even though she gives the impression that she is a against the banks, she supported the TARP bailout for the banks. She also gives the impression that she is anti war, pro civil liberties and anti democratic establishment but yet she has very little to show for it in her action or speech. In essence I think she is a fake just like most politicians.
For me, I do not like her because even though she gives the impression that she is a against the banks, she supported the TARP bailout for the banks. She also gives the impression that she is anti war, pro civil liberties and anti democratic establishment but yet she has very little to show for it in her action or speech. In essence I think she is a fake just like most politicians.
Similar threads
