Elite Funding Both Sides Of Immigration Issue

DianaJ

Banned
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
250
Elite Funding Both Sides Of Immigration Issue

Published on Wednesday, February 20, 2008.
http://intelstrike.com/?p=205


In yet another move by the global elite in hedge funding to insure victory no matter who wins, the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, the Macarthur Foundation, as well as others, have been providing funding to the National Council of La Raza, one of the most racist Hispanic 'civil rights' groups. La Raza literally means 'The Race' translated from Spanish, and is well known for selling racist and xenophobic propaganda to legal as well as illegal Hispanic immigrants inside the United States. They have a long and controversial history and have had clashes with whites and minorities of other races over immigration, employment and cultural issues.

The elites' cash cows have also been big donors to other left leaning illegal immigration, including MALDEF, the Center for Immigrant democracy, Casa Mexico, and the Mexican-American legal defense and education fund. A quick google search of the philanthropic groups will reveal that they are open and proud of their investments into these immigration groups. The Macarthur Foundation's own website admits proudly how they showered La Raza with $600,000 and a $350,000 grants. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has gone ever farther, coughing up over $20 million to La Raza since 2002.

And on the flip side of the immigration issue, the pro border control and anti-illegal immigration group, FAIR (Federation for American immigration reform), has received over $1.2 million dollars from the Pioneer Fund, a group founded in 1937 on the basis of study in eugenics and 'race sciences.' Several of the the Pioneer fund's beneficiaries include Arthur Jenson, Richard Lynn, J Phillip Rushton, and Roger Pearson, all right leaning eugenicists and social biology advocates. The Pioneer fund also has ties to the Council for National Policy and the Heritage foundation, two more right wing policy research organizations.

Despite funding both sides of the immigration issue and the apparent contradictions involved, that's not the end to the madness. The Macarthur Foundation has also been forking over dough to several planned parenthood organizations to increase the education and use of abortion and safe sex; tools of soft population control. Since 1986, the Macarthur Foundation has donated over $215 million to almost 1,000 groups and individuals in the field of population and reproductive health.

Whether it's left wing groups promoting open borders and drivers licenses for illegal aliens, or right wing groups calling for deportation and border control, the eugenics loving, big brother hugging elites have been bank rolling their way to a victorious step in moving us all closer to their vision of a new world order. How can one fail when one has pawns on both sides of the chess board? The game is fixed.

_40882641_kbe_pa_203.jpg
 
No surprise there.

Too bad their centrally controlled banking system is collapsing. But that's expected.

It's what they try to do to us to maintain their power, that should be of concern.
 
That's why neither side is right

I know Alex Jones comes down on the national sovereignty side, but I am thinking more and more that the right idea to counter the mounting pressure for global governance, is that of global individualism.

The elites funding both sides of this argument only helps make it more exaggerated, more hateful and divisive. And then one of them is going to swoop in with the globalist solution to the problems exacerbated by that of having nationalistic borders.

Nation-states do drive people apart. The fisherman in Japan, the sheepherder in New Zealand, the cigar maker in Cuba, the widget-maker in Michigan, the jeweler in Russia and the diamond miner in Africa would all trade quite freely and profitably and safely with one another without the arbitrary interference of nation states. Borders separate us. They turn our neighbor into an "other," which causes strife when this "other" leaves his territorial nation-state and lives among us without acquiescing to the territorial nation-state we have.

But the solution is not the replacement of national sovereignty with supranational sovereignty. The answer to the nation-state is not the planet-state.

The answer to the State is the Individual. It's time, perhaps, for humanity to grow up and mature beyond this silly need for geographically based slavemasters.
 
Back
Top