Eating Chicken on the Bone Makes Kids More Aggressive, Study Shows

Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
12,749
Is it possible that it is as simple as the fact that chicken drumsticks are ridiculously cheap and chicken off the bone is generally a bit more expensive?
 
I was smearing tallow from a prime rib on my sons gums when he was less than 72 hours old..

He's a devout carnivore now!
 
I was smearing tallow from a prime rib on my sons gums when he was less than 72 hours old..

He's a devout carnivore now!

I used to chew on steak before I had teeth, but I went primarily vegetarian for about 10 years. Back to something closer to paleo now, but ya never know.
 
This is one of those studies that looks like a make-work program. Probably got a decent .gov grant for it, too.
 
My Mom and Dad taught us to bite off the ends of the bones and suck out the marrow.They might have mentioned that it was good for us but we did it because it was tasty.
 
Well, this is an easy one. The uncouth heathens at walmart are buying the 50 pound boxes for $8. The properly mannered and civilized people buy the breast fillet cutlets in the 90210 zip codes.

That's the reason.
 
What a load of horse shit.

Chicken has more flavor when cooked with bone-in and skin-on. It's more nutritious too. When we eat good fat (from the skin), it stops the production of ghrelin, the hormone which increases our appetite.

One of my favorite dishes is Chicken and Rice. I only use bone-in and skin-on (Free range) chicken breast to make this dish. If you use boneless, skinless chicken breast, the chicken becomes dry as dust.
 
I remember reading that a lot of the chicken off-the-bone products were also filled with a lot of non-meat stuff. Which is why if I get wings somewhere, I always order it ON-the-bone. I have actually been told same by some waiters/waitresses.
 
Last edited:
I think the newer generations are becoming ignorant and weak-minded partially because they eat things like chicken-strips more often than off the bone. They don't know where their food comes from or what their food is and think it magically appears on the grocery shelves.
 
So if eating chicken on the bones makes kids more aggressive, does eating turkey on the bones make them even more aggressive?

Hummm.... maybe I can get me some of that government money to find out.
 
I think the newer generations are becoming ignorant and weak-minded partially because they eat things like chicken-strips more often than off the bone. They don't know where their food comes from or what their food is and think it magically appears on the grocery shelves.

Marxist-vegetarian propaganda. Stop people from eating recognizable animal parts, and substitutes are easier to implement.
 
In other news, academics who have no piratical application for their over-education, find plenty of time to spend on worthless studies. One can only hope that somehow government funding was behind this boondoggle. Back to you Bob.
 
All of you have it wrong.

Have you any idea how much money chicken soup and chicken cooked on the bone (which also gets the notoriously healthy poultry bone marrow) costs Big Pharma each year?

Jewish mothers have been singing the praises of chicken soup for millennia. No wonder Big Pharma wants to propagandize against the stuff.
 
Back
Top