Durham report finally released.

[Occam's Banana]

Move along, comrades. Nothing to see here.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1658608315490877440

 

[Occam's Banana]

Move along, comrades. Nothing to see here.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1658608315490877440

Almost half a million views, but only a few hundred "likes" so far.

Everyone can see the bubble they're in - except them.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Almost half a million views, but only a few hundred "likes" so far.

Everyone can see the bubble they're in - except them.

I'm just a rando schmuck with a few hundred followers (the Times has 55 million, BTW) who got retweeted by Michael Malice, and I got almost as many "likes" with almost 20 times fewer views.

https://twitter.com/Occams_Banana/status/1658638432074072066

 

[TheTexan]

LOL I assume that was taken way out of context because that is way too positively pro-Trump

 

[AngryCanadian]

If Republicans won't nominate the tool chosen just for them, make him the incumbent again. Republicans never primary incumbent presidents.

The Neo Republicans would prefer to have cold war era hot heads instated of moderates..

 

[Occam's Banana]

CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #83:

Durham Report Obliterates FBI for Russiagate Misconduct | SYSTEM UPDATE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvJgTDRlzbA

​

 

[Occam's Banana]

The Durham Report | Part Of The Problem 995
On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Robbie go over the revelations that have come out in the Durham Report. This Episode Was Recorded on 5.17.23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyRvn4PVft4

 

[acptulsa]

 

[TheCount]

Do you even know what it says?

Yes.

This report does not recommend any wholesale changes in the guidelines and policies
that the Department and the FBI now have in place to ensure proper conduct and accountability
in how counterintelligence activities are carried out.

 

[Todd]

Move along, comrades. Nothing to see here.

https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1658608315490877440

Gaslighting at it's best.

 

[dannno]

Yes.

LOL.. ya, because it also says they BROKE those policies.

 

[TheCount]

LOL.. ya, because it also says they BROKE those policies.

And what does it say should happen to the people who broke those policies?

 

[dannno]

And what does it say should happen to the people who broke those policies?

I would say it amounts to Seditious Conspiracy to subvert the United States, I don't think anybody could logically argue against that.

As far as who is responsible and who should be charged, it's like the banking analogy I gave earlier.

Somebody dropped an empty duffle bag in front of the bank, somebody else picks it up and takes it into the bank, somebody else brings it up to the counter and asks the lady at the counter if anybody lost their bag, some other guy drops a folded note out of his pocket in front of the bank, somebody else brings the note inside the bank and puts it on the counter, somebody else puts the note on the bag. The lady at the counter reads the note, fills the bag with money. Somebody else comes in, takes the bag and drops it on the ground, somebody else takes the bag and puts it down next to the door, somebody else takes the bag out of the bank and drops it off in front of the bank, somebody else takes the bag and drops it on the sidewalk, and finally somebody picks up the bag on the sidewalk and drives off with it in their car.

Possibly, nobody individually broke the law, but the bank was just robbed, so.....

Funny how the Proud Boys send some text messages about their non-plans for what they wanna do at a protest/riot, before it becomes a protest/riot and they get charged with it.. they try to blame Trump who said numerous times the day before and the day of, during his speech, and tweeted shortly after numerous times to be peaceful and obey the Capitol Police, they are "our friends", but whenever Democrats pull off an op like this, that is a billion times worse, it's just like "Whoopsie!!! We're sowwwyy.. it was all just a big coincidence, we swear!"

 

[TheCount]

I would say

You say lots of things.

What does the report say?

 

[Occam's Banana]

Radio Rothbard | Durham Report Exposes the FBI
Veteran investigative journalist James Bovard joins Ryan and Tho to talk about the Durham Report and what it tells us about the media and the FBI.
https://odysee.com/@mises:1/durham-report-exposes-the-fbi:3

 

[dannno]

You say lots of things.

What does the report say?

It called for the unification of Upper and Lower Canada and the introduction of responsible government. The British Parliament implemented the first point but not the second.

Oh wait, wrong Durham Report.. that was Lord Durham.

 

[acptulsa]

Who could be so stupid as to consider that a reflection on the whistle blowers?

That's their bosses admitting their own guilt.

https://twitter.com/shellenberger/status/1659651335707566080

 

[acptulsa]

 

[acptulsa]

 

[ClaytonB]

That's a good start. So, what was it about Trump that so heavily motivated all these players to frame him? It surely can't be because "he's evil", because they love evil. "He's stupid" also doesn't work because you can't get into that much hot-water just by being stupid. They have much simpler methods for dealing with the stupid ones. So, if he's not stupid, and he's not evil, then?!