Doug Wead: Some things about the Ron Paul campaign can't be discussed right now

It's not in the interest of Paul or Romney for a ruckus to take place at the convention. I'm sure both parties came together and agreed on some things conceding to Paul (Benton laid them out) in order to drown down the racking up of delegates and the impending chaos to take place at the convention.
 
The first rule of Ron Paul Campaign Strategies is that you do not talk about Ron Paul Campaign Strategies.

The second rule of Ron Paul Campaign Strategies is that you do not talk about Ron Paul Campaign Strategies.

---

By now, everyone has heard Undbinding the Delegates. This may have very well started here in Nevada during our GOP Convention. Doug and Ron were overheard discussing the possibility of unbinding delegates. Then the rumors went viral within 30 minutes.
 
Last edited:
It is obvious that a division within the campaign has happened. I believe Doug Wead is one of the good guys but I don't feel the same about John Tate. I wish Ron would clear the air and give one of those inspirational speeches to fire up his army. We all need to be united to see this thing out, that means the grassroots and the campaign need to get on the same page....unless of course an individual(s) sold us out.
 
It is obvious that a division within the campaign has happened. I believe Doug Wead is one of the good guys but I don't feel the same about John Tate. I wish Ron would clear the air and give one of those inspirational speeches to fire up his army. We all need to be united to see this thing out, that means the grassroots and the campaign need to get on the same page....unless of course an individual(s) sold us out.


And you base this on nothing.

Do people not understand how insane they sound when they make outlandish claims and have absolutely zero evidence backing them? I don't understand this desire to just make things up, especially when the implication of the completely fabricated scenario is a negative one. So not only do you have no supporting facts, you brought something to the table that had no redeeming quality.

Why? Why do that?

Why not just focus on the long term goal -- influencing minds and changing the political discourse in our nation so that we might someday live to experience an even higher level of peace, wealth and liberty?
 
Last edited:
Judging by the mood around here, nothing short of "Paul has every delegate that has been awarded so far, and they are all unbound," would make people happy.

Can't argue.

I admit, I am feeling pretty sour over recent developments, but its healthy to face reality. The chances were slim from the beginning that we win, and to think we could still WIN at this point would be delusional.

I do trust the campaign that the decisions made these last few days are in the best interest of our movement. Its tough to fathom the news, and is going to suck to watch all the momentum dry up.

I think we all need to sit back and let the campaign work out details, and continue to pick up delegates where we can. We wont win tx or ca, and I doubt we get 20% or better in either. I donated 150 recently and I still don't regret it, its going for the best cause available - liberty and peace.

Eyes on the prize..
 
Can't argue.

I admit, I am feeling pretty sour over recent developments, but its healthy to face reality. The chances were slim from the beginning that we win, and to think we could still WIN at this point would be delusional.

I do trust the campaign that the decisions made these last few days are in the best interest of our movement. Its tough to fathom the news, and is going to suck to watch all the momentum dry up.

I think we all need to sit back and let the campaign work out details, and continue to pick up delegates where we can. We wont win tx or ca, and I doubt we get 20% or better in either. I donated 150 recently and I still don't regret it, its going for the best cause available - liberty and peace.

Eyes on the prize..


Exactly!
 
Judging by the mood around here, nothing short of "Paul has every delegate that has been awarded so far, and they are all unbound," would make people happy.

I want Ron to win.

I could live with a VP deal and vote for Romney.

I could live with platform changes and vote for GJ.
 
Is it just me, or was Mr. Wead implying that whatever happened is such a big deal we won't even find out for 10 or 20 years?

The campaign has taken an EXTREMELY bizarre turn over the last week. WTF happened?
 
What sort of deal would it be? If you guys can read between the lines, then you should also be able to translate it into something useful.
 
Back
Top