Doug Wead: Some things about the Ron Paul campaign can't be discussed right now

anaconda said:
Why vote for a filthy corrupt administration. A month ago the consensus was that our vote was not for sale with a ridiculous VP slot for Ron or Rand.
Click to expand...

if the deal is rand or ron as a vp , i just might consider voting obama to send the gop a message! It is like the gop wants me to vote obama against my will. I am gonna need a vacation from this madness. The gop has been nothing but bad health for me! If this is the case all i can say is SOLDOUT!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3WXpNZXayw<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3WXpNZXayw">
 
Last edited:
My take:

Troja Horse strategy. We show up to the conventions. The Romulans do not.

It's not like a Press Release can be sent out. This IS the "barring unforeseen events" Benton talked about.
 
pen_thief said:
Me, last few days.
1284909765969.png
Click to expand...

I'm finding that watching this 500 to 600 times helps:



:)
 
anaconda said:
Agreed. Not sure why there is even any discussion otherwise here.
Click to expand...

I fully agree. But that's why Dr. Paul making a "deal" to get one of our guys in the Cabinet or something to that effect doesn't bother me. It's not like our votes are for sale, and it's not like we can win the nomination realistically at this point, so why not get what amounts to free stuff by cutting a deal?
 
speciallyblend said:
if the deal is rand or ron as a vp , i just might consider voting obama to send the gop a message! It is like the gop wants me to vote obama against my will. I am gonna need a vacation from this madness. The gop has been nothing but bad health for me! If this is the case all i can say is SOLDOUT!!
Click to expand...

I have decided I will likely vote for Obama. It's not the lesser of two evils. It's a strategic move to increase the likelihood that a liberty candidate might be competitive in 2016. It's beginning to make a lot of sense to me. The worst outcome for The Revolution is a Mittens victory in November.
 
if there is a deal, it certainly does NOT involve romney......I think I know what is happening and I will not share my thoughts in detail as it would jeopardize the plan if true.
 
Tom in NYC said:
I fully agree. But that's why Dr. Paul making a "deal" to get one of our guys in the Cabinet or something to that effect doesn't bother me. It's not like our votes are for sale, and it's not like we can win the nomination realistically at this point, so why not get what amounts to free stuff by cutting a deal?
Click to expand...

Oh hell yes. We'll take free stuff. As long as no one here gives up their vote to Mittens. But it bothers me if our guys are making deals AND expecting us to sell out.
 
ron paul teaches us to ALWAYS vote on principle.... how the hell could you do that with casting a vote for Obama!?!
 
anaconda said:
Why vote for a filthy corrupt administration. A month ago the consensus was that our vote was not for sale with a ridiculous VP slot for Ron or Rand.
Click to expand...

I don't know... having Ron just one heart beat away? OK>.. LOL It was a bad joke.
 
WHAT THE HELL??? now doug wead is running his piehole like jesse benton? these guys are killing us.... who are they actually working for? geezzzz...

scroll down to the podcast and fast fwd to the 6:00 mark:

http://www.oneradionetwork.com/geo-...cateur-ron-paul-is-the-real-deal-may-15-2012/

"I mean we recognize that Mitt Romney will be the ultimate nominee, that was kind of decided when Rick Santorum bowed out so all that he had gathered that would have worked toward a brokered convention was lost."

-Doug Wead quote from 05/15/2012 podcast radio
 
BenMuldowney said:
WHAT THE HELL??? now doug wead is running his piehole like jesse benton? these guys are killing us.... who are they actually working for? geezzzz...

scroll down to the podcast and fast fwd to the 6:00 mark:

http://www.oneradionetwork.com/geo-...cateur-ron-paul-is-the-real-deal-may-15-2012/

"I mean we recognize that Mitt Romney will be the ultimate nominee, that was kind of decided when Rick Santorum bowed out so all that he had gathered that would have worked toward a brokered convention was lost."

-Doug Wead quote from 05/15/2012 podcast radio
Click to expand...
Its all voodoo mind games. We've got Mitt right where we want him, remember.
 
fearthereaperx said:
Ron Paul made the right decision.

Probably one of the toughest ones out of his career, if not the toughest. But going forward, it's the right thing to do, so, I applaud him for making that decision in the face of an unpopularity backlash .

We were setting ourselves up for some huge unforeseen, unintended consequences at the convention. The Risk outweighed itself far greater than the reward. And I think the writing on the wall became increasingly apparent after AZ/OK, that he had to make a calculated decision quickly as litigation becomes a step closer to reality in the fight and process to win. Obviously, Ron Paul felt that it wasn't worth sacrificing 40 years worth of gains his message has garnered for an unclear shot-- with guaranteed frenzy and litigation battles-- at the convention that can prove to be detrimental to accelerating the freedom message in the future.

Freedom will be won incrementally, not overnight. And the good news is we have already turned the massive ship.

Paul has successfully changed the national narrative and pleaded his case to anyone that can hear it. It will take 4 years of Romney and the same establishmentarian policies to get the public to finally reconcile their deep-seeded beliefs as they find themselves worse off than in 2012.

That being said, a 2008-style economic crash is not that far out of the picture and can possibly occur anywhere from now until the election--especially with all of the global slowdown, euro-zone breakup, JP morgan, Chesapeake news beginning to hit the headlines. With this scenario, Ron Paul could see immense surging in polls to come in as a viable 3rd party candidate or lockup Romney's VP slot for the immense credibility he brings to the table.(Not to say him and Romney haven't already brokered some sort of deal)
Click to expand...

No no no no no.

No.
 
outspoken said:
ron paul teaches us to ALWAYS vote on principle.... how the hell could you do that with casting a vote for Obama!?!
Click to expand...
the same can be said about romney. bottom line to beat party over principle. We would be forced by the gop to hold principle over party by voting against the gop establishment(romney) rather have 8 yrs of obama then 12 of obamney. by voting against romney, folks would be holding principle over party and saving us from at least 8 years of obamney policies on top of 4 of obama. it boils down to 8 yrs of obama or 12 of obamney policy all the same. personally i perfer 8 over 12 of obama/romney 2012.
edit as i have said 2 options for the gop in tampa ,ron paul or obama! up to the gop now. I did what i could do!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

V
MAIN POINTS THE OBJECTIVISTS / ARI HAVE MISSED ABOUT AMERICA’S EROSION
Replies
0
Views
502
Viking
V
Anti Federalist
Meet the Black Robe Regiment, the latest far right, commienazi threat to Our Democracy®
Replies
8
Views
1K
SpiritOf1776_J4
S
TheClincher
Scam Pro Trump Iran War video “The truth about Soleimani and Iran, from an Iranian" Goes Viral
Replies
0
Views
196
TheClincher
TheClincher
Marenco
How an Israeli Spy-Linked Tech Firm Gained Access to the US Gov’t’s Most Classified Networks
Replies
2
Views
1K
unknown
unknown
randomname
Ron Paul: Realistically, Trump Could Be The Nominee
2 3
Replies
49
Views
3K
fr33
fr33
Back
Top