Doug Wead: Sheriff Joe Arpaio Should Receive Medal of Freedom

[jmdrake]

You're the guy who supports ZippyJuan and takes cues from him. Now it's TheCount. Gee, I wonder which anti-Ron Paul progressive you'll support next.

Yes, we certainly know who is getting pawned on the forum.

I simply support truth and opposed lies. i don't get into identity politics like antifa does, the neo nazis do and, sadly, you are doing. Saying "I must attack everything coming from users X, Y and Z because they are progressive" is a type of identity politics. Why are you not standing up against people like RestorationOfLiberty when he pushes the racist idea that Rand is wrong to try to undo the racist effects of the unconstitutional war on drugs because in doing so Rand will be restoring rights to black people?

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

I simply support truth and opposed lies.

So do I. There are people here who put "supporting member" in their avatars. They are obviously not supporting members.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

it would be a hundredth of its current size

I don't even know what you are talking about. I posted the link. It's in my sig line.

 

[jmdrake]

LOL.




Right, because nothing says limited government like his desire to see "...a Department of Education which is restricted to facilitating coordination among the departments of education of the various states in addition to providing reports and such to the executive and legislative branches."

Yes, that sure sounds like "restricted" and "limited" government.

So let me get this straight. You are against shrinking the Department of Education? You aren't really thinking this through. It's because of your right wing identity politics. TheCount is a "progressive" so, without thinking, you wrongly assume every proposal he puts forward is about growing government when the truth is that in the case you are quoting out of context, the opposite is true. Right now the Department of Education does much more than "facilitating coordination among the departments of education of the various states in addition to providing reports and such to the executive and legislative branches."

Now, why don't you explain to me exactly how Steve Bannon's propose to increase taxes on the rich to freaking 44% and put together a whopping 1 trillion dollar stimulus package where the federal government literally "throws it against the wall and sees what sticks" is limited government.

 

[jmdrake]

I don't even know what you are talking about. I posted the link. It's in my sig line.

Exactly! You are so hung up on right wing identity politics that it has limited your ability to dispassionately work through facts. The context of what TheCount wrote, where you are quoting him out of context, is a proposal to drastically reduce the current size and scope of the Department of Education to a "bully pulpit" role.

 

[jmdrake]

So do I. There are people here who put "supporting member" in their avatars. They are obviously not supporting members.

Are you a supporting member? Because with your right wing identity politics, I don't see you actually supporting the mission of this site.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

You aren't really thinking this through.

Says the guy who supports paid progressive trolls on the site.

So let me get this straight.

Yes, please do. Let me know if you ever figure it out.

 

[jmdrake]

Says the guy who supports paid progressive trolls on the site.








Yes, please do. Let me know if you ever figure it out.

More right wing identity politics. You represent everything Ron Paul is against. When in Congress he didn't reflexively oppose people like Dennis Kucinich or Cynthia McKinney just because they were progressive. When they were right he agreed with them. When the were wrong, he opposed the specific policy of where they were wrong and did so intelligently (unlike you) but he didn't carry that on into any other interactions with them. In fact that's why in 2008 Ron Paul invited Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr to his joint "3rd party presidential" press conference where he gave a joint endorsement based on principles instead of party. Bob Barr decided to be an ass because he's all about identity politics, kind of like you, and didn't show and demanded Ron Paul endorse a single candidate. So Ron Paul promptly endorsed Chuck Baldwin to spite Barr. Barr, for all of his talk about "liberty" later gave gun grabber Eric Holder for attorney general, showing how hypocritical he was being. Likewise I have yet to see you call out the progressiveness of Steve Bannon and some of the national socialists Trump supporters on this forum.

Edit: And I see you are cowardly running from the truth. Answer this.

You are against shrinking the Department of Education? You aren't really thinking this through. It's because of your right wing identity politics. TheCount is a "progressive" so, without thinking, you wrongly assume every proposal he puts forward is about growing government when the truth is that in the case you are quoting out of context, the opposite is true. Right now the Department of Education does much more than "facilitating coordination among the departments of education of the various states in addition to providing reports and such to the executive and legislative branches."

Now, why don't you explain to me exactly how Steve Bannon's propose to increase taxes on the rich to freaking 44% and put together a whopping 1 trillion dollar stimulus package where the federal government literally "throws it against the wall and sees what sticks" is limited government.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

[Blathering I skimmed. Stuff no one else will read.]

Why don't you answer my question? Why do you support paid trolls on this site?

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

When in Congress he [Ron Paul] didn't reflexively oppose people like Dennis Kucinich or Cynthia McKinney just because they were progressive.

Were McKinney and Kucinich getting paid by someone to thwart Ron Paul?

 

[jmdrake]

Why don't you answer my question? Why do you support paid trolls on this site?

Why do you support paid racists? And when are you going to answer my question?

You are against shrinking the Department of Education?

Were McKinney and Kucinich getting paid by someone to thwart Ron Paul?

More right wing identity politics from you. Zippy and TheCount aren't thwarting Ron Paul. But Trump supporters are. Without Trump and his supporters attacking Rand Paul during the primary, Rand Paul might be president. And I have yet to see you call out the racist attacks against Rand Paul for being against the drug war by your fellow trumpsters. Why is that?

 

[TheCount]

his approach is to cut government power so they can't use it, not redirect it. He says that if the government has the power to do something they will.

I was actually really enjoying him not realizing that it says the exact opposite of what he thought and having it in his signature...

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Zippy and TheCount aren't thwarting Ron Paul.

LOL. And the sun doesn't come up in the east.

[

]

And there he is. Live, from Soros headquarters.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Why do you support paid racists?

Who are you talking about?

 

[jmdrake]

LOL. And the sun doesn't come up in the east.

Actually the sun doesn't "come up" at all. It's the earth that moves around the sun. Or are you a flat earther now?

But back to the truth, something you can't handle. It was Trump and his supporters that ended Rand Paul's campaign and by extension thwarted Ron Paul. I have yet to see you call them out for it.

 

[jmdrake]

Who are you talking about?

I have yet to see you take on the racists here. I have also yet to see you explain how shrinking the department of education = expanding the federal government.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

I have yet to see you take on the racists here.

Who? You said I "support paid racists." Who?

 

[jmdrake]

Who? You said I "support paid racists." Who?

Already covered that in PM.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

Already covered that in PM.

Okay thanks; I saw that. I saw the name, but don't really know that person beyond seeing the name around. I have never replied to his posts or mentioned his name, so I don't see how I can support such a person without such interaction.

Yes, I think it is possible that paid Trump posters are here. I've seen a couple of people who might fit that mold, but it's hard for me to say. I don't say unless I am 100% sure about someone. You know that paid progressive trolls are here. All the regular posters have known it for years. Fine if you don't want to discuss it, but that doesn't change the facts.

Who would pay any Trump trolls here? The RNC? Someone with money, I suppose. It wouldn't surprise me that Soros would spend this kind of money, but would someone bother spending money for Trump trolling? I suppose that is possible, but I'd like to see more substance. I don't mind calling people out, but I have to be 100% sure. Some people here casually and carelessly throw around that word trolling. I never do that. Again, I have to be 100% sure.

 

[r3volution 3.0]