... what IS important is that they lost a family member serving the nation they have an allegiance to.
He was serving someone alright. But serving the nation? I think not.
... what IS important is that they lost a family member serving the nation they have an allegiance to.
I am a Minister Under a Vow of Poverty.
As others have said, CPUd is no longer in that camp. One of our main goals with the liberty movement is to bring people to our side, that was done with CPUd, I'm not sure why we shouldn't be grateful of that and not attack them for it.
Yep, it's time for it to end.
Bryan, I have a bridge to sell ya!
Let me think, someone who posts prolifically every day all day here, usually with articles from left/liberal sites, and only criticizes Trump. And post stupid pictures to criticism of Hillary as a response, to try to discredit the thread, of course is not a Hillary supporter ...
In some quarters, we call that a clue.
Bryan, I have a bridge to sell ya!
Let me think, someone who posts prolifically every day all day here, usually with articles from left/liberal sites, and only criticizes Trump. And post stupid pictures to criticism of Hillary as a response, to try to discredit the thread, of course is not a Hillary supporter ...
In some quarters, we call that a clue.
No if that fits the quality of a Hillary Supporter then lots of you guys fit the quality of a Trump supporter which is not allowed. Hell you guys act like this forum just appeared, and that we didn't run against your candidate.
I'm going to have to agree with Danke here, we don't really have anything solid that CPUd has actually shed his former left-winger/socialist skin. A lot of people jumped on the Ron Paul train just to be cool and then went right jollily along to support Barack Obama in 2008 and went on to mock his positions, the same thing basically happened in 2012, but to maybe a lesser extent and now those folks were likely feeling the Bern, or maybe getting carried away on the Cruz train.
We don't really have anything solid that CPUd isn't, at the very least, regressing back to his old ways. We have plenty of behavioral patterns that suggest just this very thing.
No if that fits the quality of a Hillary Supporter then lots of you guys fit the quality of a Trump supporter which is not allowed. Hell you guys act like this forum just appeared, and that we didn't run against your candidate.
Well $#@!, that's not much of a regression, he went from liberal to republican to libertarian I think he actually said no one but Paul.. He hasn't gone full neocon like some of you have.
My candidate was Rand you (mod edit). Saying I'm supporting Trump says a lot about you.
If he's backing Johnson (who I voted for back in 2012), he's basically back in the same territory that he was when he was a Clinton supporter given some of the stupid stuff that Johnson has both said and now claims to support, and he doesn't really appear to be backing Johnson, but rather being a spam machine for websites that no intelligent human being should be visiting.
P.S. - I'm not a Trump supporter, please learn how to read before mouthing off.
You're attacking us when the Trump people are parading in our forum like its theirs?? That says a lot about you.
[h=1]Donald Trump: 'I would certainly think about running as an independent' (if Ron Paul was the nominee) He' doesn't even think in terms of Israel[/h]
You are a Trump supporter' supporter, i get you you just support the supporters, not Trump himself. got it.
If he's backing Johnson (who I voted for back in 2012), he's basically back in the same territory that he was when he was a Clinton supporter given some of the stupid stuff that Johnson has both said and now claims to support, and he doesn't really appear to be backing Johnson, but rather being a spam machine for websites that no intelligent human being should be visiting.
P.S. - I'm not a Trump supporter, please learn how to read before mouthing off. Also, if CPUd is a "no one but Paul" guy, why is he sourcing websites that were instrumental in destroying Ron Paul's 2008 and 2012 campaigns and having been dogging Rand the entire time he's been in the senate with negative stories. I'm sorry, but I still have a functioning B.S. meter that keeps me from being overly gullible, sad I can't say the same for you.
No, I'm a guy who is tired of seeing crap from anti-Ron/Rand Paul websites flooding this entire forum. Again, read first, comprehend second, and then make at least an attempt to keep your emotions in check before lobbing accusations my way.
Do you need me to dig up some of the crap that sites like Salon and Politico put out about Ron and Rand in the past?
Let me think, someone who posts prolifically every day all day here, usually with articles from left/liberal sites, and only criticizes Trump. And post stupid pictures to criticism of Hillary as a response, to try to discredit the thread, of course is not a Hillary supporter ...
Do you find that more or less believable than a long time member who "suddenly" discovers an affinity for nationalism the second a nationalist candidate is on the ballot?
Perfect example of my point.
Do you find that more or less believable than a long time member who "suddenly" discovers an affinity for nationalism the second a nationalist candidate is on the ballot?