Donald Trump Donald Trump on the View: Obama Needs to Show His Birth Certificate

Lots of "new" members tend to post in these harebrained threads.

What if I said I agreed with you that it is a flawed aspect of the Constitution, and I don't care where he was born, yet I still want to see his BC? What if I said the reason WHY is because he could be getting blackmailed over it, as it is a very serious issue that he could be tried and found guilty of very serious crimes? Keeping us bogged down in unnecessary wars, breaking all his campaign promises, all because he is being blackmailed.. haven't you thought of that? Don't you realize this is the reason WHY candidates are vetted by the media? He's never been vetted over this, the media refuses to make a serious issue of it and instead lie and tell everybody that he has shown his BC already.
 
Last edited:
A comment on the DT Facebook page
http://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump
Mr Trump you today earned my devotion and my vote and time decated to your run for president !! I was waiting for a real man with balls to force the issue of Obamas Records his birth his school his collage records thank you after 4 years of lsitening to this liar say he's American Finally someone who is a man with the balls and brains to see what the rest of us do!!! Thank you Please run Sir for president~~
 
Yeah, that's why it's such a good thing we dodged the bullet with that damn dirty Panamanian, John McCain. I'm sure he has secret pro-Noriega sympathies.


There was a much stronger case to be made for Bush being an illegitimate President than anything I've ever seen put forward about Obama. (not that I think Bush was illegitimate, either)

No, I believe McCain was born of two U.S. citizens on a military base. He would qualify as natural born. It doesn't matter where you are born, as long as both your mother and father are citizens, you would be natural born.
 
Funny how none of the liberal idiots on The View claimed Obama has released his birth certificate (the COLB).
 
US Law:

... a person born, after December 23, 1952, outside the United States and out of wedlock shall be held to have acquired at birth the nationality status of his mother, if the mother had the nationality of the United States at the time of such person’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1409.html
 
Barry "um, i dont know about that.
um.

...have u seen my peace prize?"
 
its a strawman... that is why they luv 2 ride the paper segment of the question- on BOTH sid3s when the REAL question is "hooshier daddy?"

...and why do you seem to be at war with
Christians
freedom
health
the "poor"
the "rich"
the actual poor
the individual as a whole
in THIS country, you know the one you are from

?



WELL?!!?!?
 
Last edited:
So why isn't team Obama mentioning this law? All I hear from them is the COLB and newspaper birth announcements.

Because it makes the people who push the issue look like racist kooks and delegitimizes all their other arguments. The provision discriminates foreign born citizens, it judges people based on where they were born. When you start judging people based on where they were born you really are getting into some muddy territory. It doesn't take a huge leap to get from there to Jim Crow laws.
 
Because it makes the people who push the issue look like racist kooks and delegitimizes all their other arguments. The provision discriminates foreign born citizens, it judges people based on where they were born. When you start judging people based on where they were born you really are getting into some muddy territory. It doesn't take a huge leap to get from there to Jim Crow laws.

But you can still be blackmailed for it, no?
 
For someone to even embrace such a clearly flawed aspect of the constitution is rather disturbing. It discriminates against people purely based on where they were born, how can someone have control over that? It's also quite despicable because we live in a society created by immigrants. To call into question their loyalty is an insult and reveals quite a weak character.

Fine. Propose a constitutional amendment and try to get that provision changed. But simply ignoring parts of the constitution that we think are "bad" or "outdated" is what got us in the mess that we're in.
 
Back
Top