fisharmor
Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2008
- Messages
- 12,455
I just read an argument that universal health coverage will drive down costs, because if people are covered they will get preventative checkups.
I have pretty good health coverage, and I don't go to the doctor.
The couple times I've been over the last decade, I've had to speak to a GP first, who simply didn't care about my problem.
The one time I had a skin problem that I HAD to get taken care of, I ended up seeing three doctors before I found one who recommended the right cream.
Who else just doesn't bother most of the time? And how much "preventative" medicine that the government thinks will solve everything, actually doesn't happen - and will never happen - because we foster a system where doctors get paid no matter what, and thus don't have any incentive to give a shit what happens to us?
Moreover, since I'm pretty much covered costs-wise if something that was preventable ends up being a serious problem, what economic reason do I have to waste my time with three different doctors every time I have a minor inconvenience?
I have pretty good health coverage, and I don't go to the doctor.
The couple times I've been over the last decade, I've had to speak to a GP first, who simply didn't care about my problem.
The one time I had a skin problem that I HAD to get taken care of, I ended up seeing three doctors before I found one who recommended the right cream.
Who else just doesn't bother most of the time? And how much "preventative" medicine that the government thinks will solve everything, actually doesn't happen - and will never happen - because we foster a system where doctors get paid no matter what, and thus don't have any incentive to give a shit what happens to us?
Moreover, since I'm pretty much covered costs-wise if something that was preventable ends up being a serious problem, what economic reason do I have to waste my time with three different doctors every time I have a minor inconvenience?