Do you think Maine GOP Caucus was fraudulent?

[Philosophy_of_Politics]

hxxp://www.wabi.tv/#pd_a_5948748

Local Maine News Station

 

[tbone717]

It would be interesting to see what the people of Maine think rather than having us slam the poll with out thoughts.

 

[Philosophy_of_Politics]

It would be interesting to see what the people of Maine think rather than having us slam the poll with out thoughts.

I'd rather those who committed it, see the numbers and be a little nervous.

 

[Cleaner44]

Yes 80.72% (201 votes)

 

[ShaneEnochs]

How is it even a question at this point?

 

[Trigonx]

How is it even a question at this point?

touche

+rep

 

[Clox]

How is it even a question at this point?

This was my first thought when reading the topic too.

 

[No Free Beer]

simple:

YES

 

[TheViper]

All 48 No votes are Maine GOP party officials and the Romney campaign.

 

[Barrex]

[h=2]Do you think Maine GOP Caucus was fraudulent? NO[/h]

At this point I know they were.

 

[ProBlue33]

YES

 

[marcirvine]

Absolutely rigged. Waiting for the state GOP to step down, to be number 3, after Iowa and Nevada. How many state GOP chairs are going to have to step down from fraud before this is over? People in general are forgetting about south carolina too. According to reports, there was almost nothing but Ron Paul signs in many SC towns, but somehow those towns placed Ron Paul in third place or so in the elections. Articles were posted on the web relating how many ballot boxes arrived at the counting stations with the seals broken! Yet, they were not questioned anyway. I know it is hard to go back as each state goes by, but I really hope the campaign and others are stacking up all the accumulating evidence.

 

[Carlybee]

Yes and if not rectified I don't have much confidence in what's ahead.

 

[sailingaway]

"fraudulent" is a pretty tough word. "massaged" might be better...just not reporting everything....

 

[marcirvine]

http://www.mainegop.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/me_gop_caucus_results.pdf

This listing shows many towns OUTSIDE of the three counties already being contested, namely Kennebec, Waldo, and Washington, as also being listed as 0 votes. This is obvious discounting of many votes and so can be called nothing but fraud.

 

[ProBlue33]

"fraudulent" is a pretty tough word. "massaged" might be better...just not reporting everything....

Not reporting everything to give the state to the front runner can't be anything other than electorally "Fraudulent"!

 

[Mark37snj]

Yes.....303
No........60

 

[Captain Shays]

Let me see here. They exclude the voters from three different counties. Hmm. Thats a tough one

 

[oceankyle]

Let me see here. They exclude the voters from three different counties. Hmm. Thats a tough one

Weren't a lot of caucuses within counties that were counted excluded as well? Looking at that pdf with all of the counties listed and their sub-areas, there are zeros everywhere!

 

[TheViper]

"fraudulent" is a pretty tough word. "massaged" might be better...just not reporting everything....

Fraud is fraud. Doesn't matter if 1 vote was removed or 1,000 votes.

If you committed fraud on $1 or $1,000, they still hit you up for fraud.