Do you believe in the pizzagate scandal?

What statement lines up the best with your thoughts on pizzagate?

  • No, not at all.

    Votes: 4 7.8%
  • Half truth, minor persons mentioned might be pedophiles. No evidence.

    Votes: 5 9.8%
  • True, higher up people are complicit in rape, murder of children. Podestas, clintons, Obama.

    Votes: 27 52.9%
  • True, only way to get to the top in the west. 90% of our elite are murderous satanic pedophiles.

    Votes: 8 15.7%
  • I don't know, I don't care, Too tired of conspiracies.

    Votes: 7 13.7%

  • Total voters
    51
Right back at ya.

In any case:

1. The incident took place in darkness of night.

2. Gerry McCann was initially a suspect.

3. It does not take two full grown men top carry a little girl, e.g., the other brother could have been waiting in the vehicle, or the father could have dropped the child off to the Podesta brothers who were waiting in a vehicle.

4. The Podesta brothers were in-fact the area at the time, yes?

5. The e-fits were kept secret for 5-years. Why?

6. A porn star was cast in the Crimewatch recreation. Hmmm, yea that is so totally appropriate, considering.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cCann-suspect-E-fits-kept-secret-5-years.html


Fun fact: 'Podesta' means power; in medieval Italian communes, A Podesta is the highest judicial and military magistrate.
 
In any case:
4. The Podesta brothers were in-fact the area at the time, yes?

Is that established?

All of the claims the Podestas were there are derived from this statement on this website:

You have to throw all your eggs into that basket to accept it.

The Podesta/McCann connection was by far the most interesting thing to me about pizzagate until it started falling apart on closer inspection.
 
Last edited:
Right back at ya.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-24513267


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...n-two-callers-name-man-in-e-fit-pictures.html


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/10/27/madeleine-mccann-kate-gerry-mi5_n_4167645.html


etc etc etc (Google "Madeleine McCann E-fit")

There are those who have investigated the claims of the pizzagaters and there are those who blindly accept everything they read on 4chan.

They got such a good look that they gave such wildly different descriptions that two completely different pictures were drawn?
 
I think he means the sketches.

In either case their facial features are somewhat similar. However, the two sketches, individually appear to match up to only one of the brothers, but subjectively each could match up to the more heaver set brother, but not so much to John, which the one sketch is a dead ringer, while the other sketch of the more filled out cheeks also seems to include that unique mark on the forehead. But hair, eyes, skin tone, and lips are otherwise very similar.

The suspect is still outstanding, there seems to be evidence showing these two were in the locality at the time, evidence seems to suggest that these two are into pedo-occult cultures and possibly heavy narcotics, these two, the father has been ruled out as a suspect (who was also considered a possible match to the drawing), especially John are an identical match to the images; therefore, it is grossly negligent to not question the two brothers on the matter and furthermore the parents as to any connections they may have to the Podesta brothers--who are clearly politically affluent and have heavy pull with the MSM.
 
I'm a natural sceptic, so here is my take:
1. Is there a pizza code in the Podesta emails that refers to something that is not food related - yes, self-evident
2. Is this code known for pedophilia - yes, see FBI manuals
3. Could this code be used for other shady stuff that might not be sexual abuse related, eg political power brokering - yes
4. Are the people involved in pizzagate (Podestas, pizza restaurant etc.) into weird satanic art with pedo and ritualistic connotations - yes
5. Is there a lot of circumstantial evidence (social media posts, symbolism, artwork etc.) that points to pedophilia - yes
6. Is pedophilia prevalent in politics - yes, because it is a blackmail tool and these scumbags are protected by the power structure
7. Is there hard evidence beyond a doubt that the people currently under internet grassroots investigation are pedos or associated with pedos? - no, at least not public evidence (who knows what is in the Weiner emails...)
8. Is there enough circumstantial evidence for law enforcement to start an investigation, incl. obtaining search warrants for electronic devices and locations like the pizza restaurant - yes, probably depends on the judge
9. Is law enforecement capable to conduct an investigation without interference from higher-ups - I doubt it.
 
I'm a natural sceptic, so here is my take:
1. Is there a pizza code in the Podesta emails that refers to something that is not food related - yes, self-evident
2. Is this code known for pedophilia - yes, see FBI manuals
3. Could this code be used for other shady stuff that might not be sexual abuse related, eg political power brokering - yes
4. Are the people involved in pizzagate (Podestas, pizza restaurant etc.) into weird satanic art with pedo and ritualistic connotations - yes
5. Is there a lot of circumstantial evidence (social media posts, symbolism, artwork etc.) that points to pedophilia - yes
6. Is pedophilia prevalent in politics - yes, because it is a blackmail tool and these scumbags are protected by the power structure
7. Is there hard evidence beyond a doubt that the people currently under internet grassroots investigation are pedos or associated with pedos? - no, at least not public evidence (who knows what is in the Weiner emails...)
8. Is there enough circumstantial evidence for law enforcement to start an investigation, incl. obtaining search warrants for electronic devices and locations like the pizza restaurant - yes, probably depends on the judge
9. Is law enforecement capable to conduct an investigation without interference from higher-ups - I doubt it.

10. Is John Podesta close friends with a convicted pedo named Dennis Hastert? - yes
 
I'm a natural sceptic, so here is my take:
1. Is there a pizza code in the Podesta emails that refers to something that is not food related - yes, self-evident
2. Is this code known for pedophilia - yes, see FBI manuals

The FBI manuals say nothing about the code words, only symbols. The code words were devised entirely by an imaginitive person seeking to find a pattern of suspicion in the emails.
 
Is he or was he before Hastert was exposed?

it was Tony Podesta, sorry. He was and is still in contact with him.

http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-podesta-support-pedophile/

Ant then there was this weird statement from John once he was busted for paying the blackmail.

"Might be time for Denny to vanish to an undisclosed Japanese island."

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/11508

Sounds like a weird thing to say doesn't it? You would expect someone to say something like "Oh my, I never knew Denny was into so much weird shit!"
 
The FBI manuals say nothing about the code words, only symbols. The code words were devised entirely by an imaginitive person seeking to find a pattern of suspicion in the emails.

So what the hell are they talking about in this email?
> The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems> pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you’re> busy, so feel free not to respond if it’s not yours or you don’t want it.

cuz it sure as hell isn't about pizza or maps
 
So what the hell are they talking about in this email?


cuz it sure as hell isn't about pizza or maps

I know. I've read that email many times. No idea what they're talking about. Why would it be pedophelia? Could be drugs. Could be something completely innocuous. It could make total sense in some non-criminal context. There's absolutely no way to tell. If we took all of your personal and business emails and went through them, there would be equally nonsensical stuff to an outside observer.

The guide to pedo pizza terminology that's been floating around is the figment of somebody's twisted imagination. Has anybody even seen an attribution as to who originally tweeted it?
 
Back
Top