Diebold From The Democratic Side

[Sir Rhino]

Could be a red herring... or not.

Keith Olbermann has at least one Let's Laugh At Bill O'Reilly segment on every show. That's where I saw a clip of BOR saying it.

BTW - Is there a general opinion of Olbermann around here?

 

[Fight-n-Mad]

Keith Olbermann has at least one Let's Laugh At Bill O'Reilly segment on every show. That's where I saw a clip of BOR saying it.

BTW - Is there a general opinion of Olbermann around here?

Well, I think the general consensus is that the MSM is pretty much full of crap. The right wing media are shills, and the left wing media are fake resistance. Personally I think that's a blanket assumption, but I'm really not sure where the exceptions are. I wouldn't trust any of them.

 

[Sir Rhino]

Molly - Lookie what I found on the other BBS this morning

Hey SR

I'm trying to get my wife to respond to this thread.
She has a few questions and may have spotted an error?

But she's at a statistical analysis conference at the moment.

Cool Beans, huh?

 

[dannno]

I don't care if there is a group of overlords, whether it is called The Bilderberg Group, The Trilateral Commission, or even Skull And Bones, pulling the strings and controling us all. They may or may not be there.

The point is that Bill Clinton was invited and attended in 1991, the year before he was elected, and Hillary was invited and attended in 2006, so she has their backing and full support. They are willing to do a lot more than rig elections to stay in power.

My focus is on getting Bush and his cronys out of political power. If I have to turn around and fight some other group of corrupt goons, because I haven't struck down the real heart of evil ... then so be it.

Ya but look what they have you doing, they have you focused on fighting phony enemies (not the recount thing, I think you're doing great work here, but in general)... all this other stuff is a distraction. Bush/Co IS the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, Skull and Bones, etc... They are direct representatives of these groups, and so is Hillary and even Obama to an extent... but so is Giulianni and I'm sure the rest of the Republicans would fall right in line, they HAVE to... that's how much control these people have over our Government.

Anyways, Ron Paul is really the only candidate who refers to these external forces on our system in an honest way. Other candidates like to talk about lobbyists or whatever, but they don't want to talk about who is behind the lobbyists.

 

[dannno]

The right wing media are shills, and the left wing media are fake resistance.

+1


(note: take out the word MEDIA and replace with ESTABLISHMENT, this statement still applies)

 

[Sir Rhino]

Ok, good ... it looks like you folks don't have anything against Keith Olbermann in particular. He's just one of ... whatever.

This clip, in my opinion, shows KO at his very best.

If you check it out, I'll bet you like what you see.

 

[Sir Rhino]

Molly - I have a message for ya.

BTW Sir Rhino

You realize, of course, that never in the history of politics has there been a comeback like McCain's, proving you can make a souffle rise twice?

You might want to whisper in her ear the name John Kerry. Take a look at his place in the polls as late as November of 2003 and in less than two months he took out a mortgage on his house and cameback to win the Iowa caucuses.

 

[Molly1]

Well, I think the general consensus is that the MSM is pretty much full of crap. The right wing media are shills, and the left wing media are fake resistance. Personally I think that's a blanket assumption, but I'm really not sure where the exceptions are. I wouldn't trust any of them.

Chomsky even tells us what they are doing (he's one of them), he's even named it, "manufactured consent." The idea is to keep you arguing inside the box---but you will stay inside the box.

That said, I still like Olberman.

 

[Molly1]

Molly - I have a message for ya.

You're right. And Diebold picked him in New Hampshire.

 

[dannno]

Chomsky even tells us what they are doing (he's one of them), he's even named it, "manufactured consent." The idea is to keep you arguing inside the box---but you will stay inside the box.

Ugh, I was a HUGE Chomsky fan back in college.. I was so disappointed to find out that even though he is saying all the right things, ultimately he is a world government gatekeeper.

If you follow his advice, you can be lead to the truth, but he won't give you the complete truth (though he tells a hell of a lot more of it than most)

That said, I still like Olberman.

I've heard him say some great things, but ya...fake resistance..

 

[dannno]

You're right. And Diebold picked him in New Hampshire.

I hope you PM'd Sir Rhino back and told him Kerry is Skull and Bones

 

[Molly1]

Ugh, I was a HUGE Chomsky fan back in college.. I was so disappointed to find out that even though he is saying all the right things, ultimately he is a world government gatekeeper.

If you follow his advice, you can be lead to the truth, but he won't give you the complete truth (though he tells a hell of a lot more of it than most)




I've heard him say some great things, but ya...fake resistance..

Yeah, well Chomsky even says it's the top 20 percent who have to be controlled.

Thus, you tell them what they can think, and keep them fighting inside the box.

Are we still being controlled?

Probably.

But at least we're counting the votes!

 

[Molly1]

Molly - Lookie what I found on the other BBS this morning


Cool Beans, huh?

Yes!

Let us know what she says.

 

[parocks]

If you can show that Hillary Clinton is guilty of voter fraud, then go for it ... take it as far as you can. I have no vested interest in seeing her get the nomination.

I have the same right to persue the possibility of election fraud perpetrated by LHS on Diebold equipment. You think the evidense is vague, I think it's pretty clear ... so we have a difference of opinion.

It's possible that both Hillary and LHS are guilty of fraud. If so, I hope we are both successful in our separate quests.

What again, is this clear evidence of voter fraud that you've found?

 

[parocks]

Smoking GUN


Optical Scan
Clinton 91,717 52.9507%
Obama 81,495 47.0493%
Total 173,212

Hand Counted
Clinton 20,889 47.0494%
Obama 23,509 52.9506%
Total 44,398

Those numbers are, no doubt, interesting.

How, as the scan and the hand numbers were coming in simultaneously, do you suppose they could get the numbers to match up just right?

 

[parocks]

Could be a red herring... or not.

I first heard about this vans of Hillary supporters from a Ron Paul pollwatcher who witnessed it first hand.

 

[ProBlue33]

He also mentioned Kucinich on Leno the other night. I don't know that he'd work as a running mate, but they definitely have an interesting relationship in Washington. I'd love to see more of that. You know what, I would love to see a Paul-Obama or Obama-Paul ticket too. America loves both of them, just not usually at the same time.

An Obama / Paul Ticket would be bulletproof, nothing put up could touch it, imagine the debates. It would never happen but could you imagine how powerful that ticket would be. Just wow.

 

[Sir Rhino]

Holy Crap!

Remember this ...

(Which I explained in an earlier post)

Well, check this out

 

[Molly1]

Hi Sir Rhino, lol

What are those pictures? Romney and Clinton having a grand old time on Diebold?

 

[Sir Rhino]

I was just about to delete that and recheck my numbers.

I find it hard to believe it's that bad.