angelatc
Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 50,703
That's the reason why the Koch brothers left the Libertarian Party.
That's why everybody leaves the Libertarian Party.
That's the reason why the Koch brothers left the Libertarian Party.
David Koch is an opportunist.
Koch bought his way onto the ticket.
Not confirmed if suspected neocons Kochies are hardcore war lobby pimps but they did fund notorios pro ethnic cleansing founder of Freedomworks.
Oh look. Real Research:
David Koch on the Iraq War:
He opposed the Iraq war, saying that the war has "cost a lot of money, and it's taken so many American lives". "I question whether that was the right thing to do. In hindsight that looks like it was not a good policy." he told an interviewer.
SOURCE:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/paranoid-style-liberal-politics_555525.html?nopager=1
When did he oppose Iraq war first? By Apr 4, 2011, everybody and theit mother was calling Iraq war a mistake. What did he say/do if anything in 2002-03 when neocon lobbies were plotting war propaganda?
In Defense of the Kochtopus
AntiWar.com
August 30, 2010
The Cato Institute, which was started with Koch money, stood almost alone in Washington against the first Iraq war [.pdf], and staunchly opposed the more recent invasion – just as they oppose Obama’s wars in Afghanistan [.pdf] and beyond. Cato has also stood up for our civil liberties, opposing the PATRIOT Act, and the whole panoply of post-9/11 repressive measures initiated by the Bush administration and expanded by Obama. Right after 9/11, the Koch brothers gave the ACLU $20 million to fight off the Bushies’ assault on the Constitution (George Soros gave half as much).
Your move.
But reason he cited for opposing Iraq war and associations with some neocon groups and receiving funding from people like Foster Friess still does not put them in clear imo. This is not very solid piece but still these seem like valid questions given their financial links.
http://my.firedoglake.com/robertgre...eover-of-cato-make-war-with-iran-more-likely/
moderate libertarian,
You may want to stop reading leftist/progressive news sources if you care about the facts and the truth.
Can you recommend any good rightist/regressive or static news sources?
Seems like MSM is all corporate greed lobbies/neocon controlled.
My favorite source:
The New American
http://www.thenewamerican.com/
Pro-Small government, pro-constitution, pro-Ron Paul.
RP hasn't (yet). Still has his lifetime membership last I heard.That's why everybody leaves the Libertarian Party.
Yet he's a Republican Congressman. I think he's doing better as a Republican.RP hasn't (yet). Still has his lifetime membership last I heard.
RP hasn't (yet). Still has his lifetime membership last I heard.
Once in a while a so-called "leftist" exposes the truth-usually out of partisan reasons (but the same can be said of "rightist" news sources). This phenomenon is why Rothbard was smart to attempt to form coalitions.moderate libertarian,
You may want to stop reading leftist/progressive news sources if you care about the facts and the truth.
Once in a while a so-called "leftist" exposes the truth-usually out of partisan reasons (but the same can be said of "rightist" news sources). This phenomenon is why Rothbard was smart to attempt to form coalitions.
I never said using the party as a vehicle for a libertarian agenda as RP does is bad per se. Labels are mostly meaningless in practice.Yet he's a Republican Congressman. I think he's doing better as a Republican.