Did you know? David Koch was a Libertarian Vice-Presidential candidate in 1980

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885
clarkkoch80.jpg



Wikipedia: Political activities of the Koch family


Fred C. Koch, the father of Charles and David, was a member of the John Birch Society.[1][4] He gave a speech in 1963 warning of “a takeover” of America in which Communists would “infiltrate the highest offices of government in the U.S. until the president is a Communist, unknown to the rest of us”.[5] His anti-communism stemmed from his experiences in the Soviet Union, where the very engineers who supported the Bolshevik Revolution and told Fred Koch that they would one day take over the world, were later purged by that same movement.[citation needed]

David H. Koch was a Libertarian Vice-Presidential candidate in 1980. He advocated the abolition of Social Security, the FBI, the CIA, and public schools.[6][7] Koch put $500,000 into the race,[7] and he and Ed Clark, his presidential running mate, won 1% of the vote—the best Libertarian showing in a U.S. presidential race to date.[8] But the experience caused David Koch to change course: "I had enough," he said. "We are not a nation that debates issues. We vote on candidates' personalities." By 1984, David had parted company with the Libertarian party, because, he said, "they nominated a ticket I wasn't happy with" and "so many of the hard-core Libertarian ideas are unrealistic."[7]

Since then, Charles and David Koch have adopted a much less visible strategy toward advancing their libertarian agenda. In 1986, David Koch helped found the Citizens for a Sound Economy, and has given over $21 million to the Cato Institute.[9]
 
Yeah, sometimes I wonder how the party would have been different. They were just so committed to the lower taxes on business ideas, and not too much to the civil liberties side.
 
The Libertarian Party was not founded to be realist or even to elect public officials. It was designed to be a protest party, educational in nature, fighting to expose the two party system for what it is.
 
That 1980 ticket with Clark/Koch garnered the largest vote of any LP ticket in a presidential campaign. I think that the fact that they were running against Reagan at the time hurt their chances significantly. Also, I believe it was around the time there was a huge split in the LP between the Lew Rockwell crowd and the Koch crowd.

I don't know a whole lot about the history, though. I wasn't even born yet :)
 
i was & i remember john anderson, too.
the LP Party starts up here in 1971...
reagan had an easy victory over carter.
 
Why would a libertarian fund a neocon and like Cain? Makes no sense.

"We are not a nation that debates issues. We vote on candidates' personalities."

That quote jumped out at me and it makes sense why they support Cain. Cain is their project to prove the country does not care about debates but personalities.
 
Last edited:
I dont support people that run under the Libertarian Party. They have zero chance of getting elected and only make the Libertarians in the Republican Party look like extremists
 
I dont support people that run under the Libertarian Party. They have zero chance of getting elected and only make the Libertarians in the Republican Party look like extremists

That's the reason why the Koch brothers left the Libertarian Party.
 
Yeah, sometimes I wonder how the party would have been different. They were just so committed to the lower taxes on business ideas, and not too much to the civil liberties side.

That's silly - they're not social conservatives.
 
The Libertarian Party was not founded to be realist or even to elect public officials. It was designed to be a protest party, educational in nature, fighting to expose the two party system for what it is.

Which just reinforces my personal opinion of Libertarians and their actual usefulness.....
 
Back
Top