Deport kids, Ignore Drug Lords, Build Concentration Camps: Trump's Immigration 'Victory'

[wizardwatson]

Nice lies from the MSM.

Of course you and they side with the commies.

And we will just send them to El Salvador or Rwanda or somewhere else instead, doesn't hurt us a bit.

If we judge by the numbers:
1. Who lies the most.
2. Who gets the most coverage.

I think Trump would win the MSM designation by a landslide.

 

[wizardwatson]

While I agree with what the judge is saying, I don't think most Americans who support Trump really care about the rule of law.

They simply want revenge. They believe they've been screwed and that they are being targeted by 'globalists' and that the American legal system is a sham. Trump they see as a messianic "Warfighter" who, like Jehu, is going to purge our system with holy fire and have all the priests of Baal arrested or deported. So they simply do not care that Trump is using lawfare and ignoring the Constitution, because "so is the enemy".

In short, they think martial law with Trump as Supreme Dictator is a viable path to MAGA.

 

[PAF]

While I agree with what the judge is saying, I don't think most Americans who support Trump really care about the rule of law.

They simply want revenge. They believe they've been screwed and that they are being targeted by 'globalists' and that the American legal system is a sham. Trump they see as a messianic "Warfighter" who, like Jehu, is going to purge our system with holy fire and have all the priests of Baal arrested or deported. So they simply do not care that Trump is using lawfare and ignoring the Constitution, because "so is the enemy".

In short, they think martial law with Trump as Supreme Dictator is a viable path to MAGA.

'Reclaiming Our Sovereignty from State Power'

May 5, 2025

George Ford Smith
05/05/2025


The issue of sovereignty had been a hotly-debated topic among the Revolutionary-era colonists. In The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, historian Bernard Bailyn says that in “The last analysis it was over this issue that the Revolution was fought.” Thomas Hobbes—writing in the mid-seventeenth century—Bailyn continues, argued that the only requirement of a sovereign was the capacity to compel obedience, which didn’t necessarily mean the king.

Final, unqualified, indivisible power was . . . only one part of the notion...

• PAF
• Replies: 1
• Forum: Austrian Economics / Economic Theory

 

[acptulsa]

When I see people autistically screeching against due process...

...I can't help but think they look at what the Zionists are doing to the Palestinians and decide they want to do the same to the Cherokees.

 

[wizardwatson]

I hate to tell you folks (I don't really), but I think the concentration camp is probably the strongest theory.

Having agents that should be going after real criminals canvassing restaurants asking for I-9 forms is the bottom of the barrel of trying to make a show of force with this immigration 'crackdown'. I suspect Dotard Trump and his administration have done the math and realize they simply will not be able to do what they've made their supporters think they're going to do, so now they're in CYA/damage control mode.

My guess is they'll just slowly keep doing these publicity stunts until the news cycle and his supporters move on to something else. That something else will likely be war, because nothing satisfies Zio-tarded Americans like blowing up brown people.

It's a great "forget-me" stick for any issue that might matter, cuz gotta support those troops!

 

[nikcers]

'Reclaiming Our Sovereignty from State Power'

May 5, 2025

George Ford Smith
05/05/2025


The issue of sovereignty had been a hotly-debated topic among the Revolutionary-era colonists. In The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, historian Bernard Bailyn says that in “The last analysis it was over this issue that the Revolution was fought.” Thomas Hobbes—writing in the mid-seventeenth century—Bailyn continues, argued that the only requirement of a sovereign was the capacity to compel obedience, which didn’t necessarily mean the king.

Final, unqualified, indivisible power was . . . only one part of the notion...

• PAF
• Replies: 1
• Forum: Austrian Economics / Economic Theory

In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.

-Theodore Roosevelt

 

[nikcers]

Why is it that free immigration was a good thing before 1914 and free immigration is a bad thing today well -there is a sense in which that answer is right. -Milton Friedman

 

[wizardwatson]

It's pretty obvious that this is just Gestapo fear tactics at this point. It's rendition, but instead of rendition so we can torture them for information, we are just sending them to torture dungeons in order to intimidate and frighten anyone who might be here illegally, and I suppose, motivate them to leave on their own.

"If you are an illegal, we will send you to horrible places where you'll be raped, tortured and enslaved."

These are the kinds of "client states" this "great Christian nation" is in bed with: Libya, Somalia, Kenya, El Salvador, and worst of all Zio-hell state of Izrahell where the cops think it's their God given right to rape prisoners.

"But I'm white and I love Trump and Jesus! I'm sure when Trump leaves office there's no danger of them using this against me and my MAGA friends."

Zio-tards. I hope you enjoy these last 3 years of sniffing your own farts.

 

[CCTelander]

.

Kristallnacht, AmeriKan style.

 

[TheTexan]

Well I mean, there's better ways to handle it, but frankly, my patience is pretty thin for illegals and immigrants in general.

If other illegals don't want to get sent to Libya, they know how to leave this country before that happens

 

[wizardwatson]

Well I mean, there's better ways to handle it, but frankly, my patience is pretty thin for illegals and immigrants in general.

If other illegals don't want to get sent to Libya, they know how to leave this country before that happens

I get it, we're all in prison, so prison rules apply. However, I haven't decided who to pick yet. Not really into the "American History X" confused white boy squad. My wife's half Spanish, so leaning towards the Cholos. They got better work ethic and are generally more religious. Honor is important. Yeah, they're a little overboard with the machismo, but angry white boys have self-esteem issues. Too many tattoos is a dead giveaway.

 

[wizardwatson]

I'm shocked and in disbelief that the DHS would immediately act whenever a Zionist organization wants them to deport someone.

ZOG loves your race war more than you do, MAGA.

So they will use this fake deportation agenda to browbeat America into never speaking badly about the Zio-state's genocide, and in the process they'll be setting up a nice little police state with concentration camps when they tank the economy and it gets really bad.

The criminals will all stay of course, because-surprise, surprise-they aren't protesting on campuses and they don't use their real name when they shop on Amazon. Not to mention the fact that most of the drug mules are American citizens.

However, deporting women and babies works for them, because it exacerbates the race wars.

 

[wizardwatson]

"If the courts don't ignore the Constitution we are looking into ways to engage in treason and just declare an arbritrary 'war' so that we can ignore the courts and possibly just arrest judges."

But don't worry MAGA. No one would dream of using this against citizens. Yeah, they screwed the J6-ers, but that was completely different. As long as you never so much as think about criticizing ZOG your inalienable rights will remain inalienable.

 

[wizardwatson]

This political prisoner has since been released from her captivity for the heinous crime of telling a story.



What pray tell, did this woman write that got Trump administrations' panties in a bunch?

Let's see:

ARTICLE BY Rumeysa Ozturk:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj
On March 4, the Tufts Community Union Senate passed 3 out of 4 resolutions demanding that the University acknowledge the Palestinian genocide, apologize for University President Sunil Kumar’s statements, disclose its investments and divest from companies with direct or indirect ties to Israel. These resolutions were the product of meaningful debate by the Senate and represent a sincere effort to hold Israel accountable for clear violations of international law. Credible accusations against Israel include accounts of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide.

Unfortunately, the University’s response to the Senate resolutions has been wholly inadequate and dismissive of the Senate, the collective voice of the student body. Graduate Students for Palestine joins Tufts Students for Justice in Palestine, the Tufts Faculty and Staff Coalition for Ceasefire and Fletcher Students for Palestine to reject the University’s response. Although graduate students were not allowed by the University into the Senate meeting, which lasted for almost eight hours, our presence on campus and financial entanglement with the University via tuition payments and the graduate work that we do on grants and research makes us direct stakeholders in the University’s stance.

While an argument may be made that the University should not take political stances and should focus on research and intellectual exchange, the automatic rejection, dismissive nature and condescending tone in the University’s statement have caused us to question whether the University is indeed taking a stand against its own declared commitments to free speech, assembly and democratic expression. According to the Student Code of Conduct, “[a]ctive citizenship, including exercising free speech and engaging in protests, gatherings, and demonstrations, is a vital part of the Tufts community.” In addition, the Dean of Students Office has written, “[w]hile at times the exchange of controversial ideas and opinions may cause discomfort or even distress, our mission as a university is to promote critical thinking, the rigorous examination and discussion of facts and theories, and diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Why then is the University discrediting and disregarding its students who practice the very ideals of critical thinking, intellectual exchange and civic engagement that Tufts claims to represent?

The role of the TCU Senate resolutions is abundantly clear. The Senate’s resolutions serve as a “strong lobbying tool that expresses to the Tufts administration the wants and needs of the student body. They speak as a collective voice and are instrumental in enacting systemic changes.” In this case, the “systemic changes” that the collective voice of the student body is calling for are for the University to end its complicity with Israel insofar as it is oppressing the Palestinian people and denying their right to self-determination — a right that is guaranteed by international law. These strong lobbying tools are all the more urgent now given the order by the International Court of Justice confirming that the Palestinian people of Gaza’s rights under the Genocide Convention are under a “plausible” risk of being breached.

This collective student voice is not without precedent. Today, the University may remember with pride its decision in February 1989 to divest from South Africa under apartheid and end its complicity with the then-racist regime. However, we must remember that the University divested up to 11 years after some of its peers. For instance, the Michigan State University Board of Regents passed resolutions to end its complicity with Apartheid South Africa as early as 1978. Had Tufts heeded the call of the student movement in the late 1970s, the University could have been on the right side of history sooner.

We reject any attempt by the University or the Office of the President to summarily dismiss the role of the Senate and mischaracterize its resolution as divisive. The open and free debate demonstrated by the Senate process (exemplified by the length, open notice and substantive exchange in the proceedings and the non-passing of one of the proposed resolutions), together with the serious organizing efforts of students, warrant credible self-reflection by the Office of the President and the University. We, as graduate students, affirm the equal dignity and humanity of all people and reject the University’s mischaracterization of the Senate’s efforts.

The great author and civil rights champion James Baldwin once wrote: “The paradox of education is precisely this: that as one begins to become conscious one begins to examine the society in which [they are] being educated.” As an educator, President Kumar should embrace efforts by students to evaluate “diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Furthermore, the president should trust in the Senate’s rigorous and democratic process and the resolutions that it has achieved.

We urge President Kumar and the Tufts administration to meaningfully engage with and actualize the resolutions passed by the Senate.

This op-ed was written by Nick Ambeliotis (CEE, ‘25), Fatima Rahman (STEM Education, ‘27), Genesis Perez (English, ‘27) and Rumeysa Ozturk (CSHD, ‘25) and is endorsed by 32 other Tufts School of Engineering and Arts and Sciences Graduate Students.

[/end article]
...

Hmmmm, so:

1. Tufts University’s response to TCU Senate resolutions was dismissive and inadequate.
2. President Kumar’s condescending tone undermined student voice and free speech.
3. University mischaracterized Senate resolutions as divisive, ignoring their democratic process.
4. Administration failed to engage with demands to acknowledge Palestinian issues and divest.
5. Response contradicted Tufts’ stated values of critical thinking and civic engagement.

For this great crime of lobbying the university, Zio-propaganda group Canary Mission doxxed her, and Trump's gestapo men grabbed her off the street and threw her in jail.

Zio-tard Trump made this happen as he signed the "hate speech will get you deported" EO on his first day in office.

"Thou shall not say anything ZOG doesn't want you to say."

Oath of office be damned. I mean, he's not a lawyer, am I right?

Next up, war with Iran.

So much winning.

 

[nikcers]

This political prisoner has since been released from her captivity for the heinous crime of telling a story.



What pray tell, did this woman write that got Trump administrations' panties in a bunch?

Let's see:

ARTICLE BY Rumeysa Ozturk:

https://www.tuftsdaily.com/article/2024/03/4ftk27sm6jkj
On March 4, the Tufts Community Union Senate passed 3 out of 4 resolutions demanding that the University acknowledge the Palestinian genocide, apologize for University President Sunil Kumar’s statements, disclose its investments and divest from companies with direct or indirect ties to Israel. These resolutions were the product of meaningful debate by the Senate and represent a sincere effort to hold Israel accountable for clear violations of international law. Credible accusations against Israel include accounts of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide.

Unfortunately, the University’s response to the Senate resolutions has been wholly inadequate and dismissive of the Senate, the collective voice of the student body. Graduate Students for Palestine joins Tufts Students for Justice in Palestine, the Tufts Faculty and Staff Coalition for Ceasefire and Fletcher Students for Palestine to reject the University’s response. Although graduate students were not allowed by the University into the Senate meeting, which lasted for almost eight hours, our presence on campus and financial entanglement with the University via tuition payments and the graduate work that we do on grants and research makes us direct stakeholders in the University’s stance.

While an argument may be made that the University should not take political stances and should focus on research and intellectual exchange, the automatic rejection, dismissive nature and condescending tone in the University’s statement have caused us to question whether the University is indeed taking a stand against its own declared commitments to free speech, assembly and democratic expression. According to the Student Code of Conduct, “[a]ctive citizenship, including exercising free speech and engaging in protests, gatherings, and demonstrations, is a vital part of the Tufts community.” In addition, the Dean of Students Office has written, “[w]hile at times the exchange of controversial ideas and opinions may cause discomfort or even distress, our mission as a university is to promote critical thinking, the rigorous examination and discussion of facts and theories, and diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Why then is the University discrediting and disregarding its students who practice the very ideals of critical thinking, intellectual exchange and civic engagement that Tufts claims to represent?

The role of the TCU Senate resolutions is abundantly clear. The Senate’s resolutions serve as a “strong lobbying tool that expresses to the Tufts administration the wants and needs of the student body. They speak as a collective voice and are instrumental in enacting systemic changes.” In this case, the “systemic changes” that the collective voice of the student body is calling for are for the University to end its complicity with Israel insofar as it is oppressing the Palestinian people and denying their right to self-determination — a right that is guaranteed by international law. These strong lobbying tools are all the more urgent now given the order by the International Court of Justice confirming that the Palestinian people of Gaza’s rights under the Genocide Convention are under a “plausible” risk of being breached.

This collective student voice is not without precedent. Today, the University may remember with pride its decision in February 1989 to divest from South Africa under apartheid and end its complicity with the then-racist regime. However, we must remember that the University divested up to 11 years after some of its peers. For instance, the Michigan State University Board of Regents passed resolutions to end its complicity with Apartheid South Africa as early as 1978. Had Tufts heeded the call of the student movement in the late 1970s, the University could have been on the right side of history sooner.

We reject any attempt by the University or the Office of the President to summarily dismiss the role of the Senate and mischaracterize its resolution as divisive. The open and free debate demonstrated by the Senate process (exemplified by the length, open notice and substantive exchange in the proceedings and the non-passing of one of the proposed resolutions), together with the serious organizing efforts of students, warrant credible self-reflection by the Office of the President and the University. We, as graduate students, affirm the equal dignity and humanity of all people and reject the University’s mischaracterization of the Senate’s efforts.

The great author and civil rights champion James Baldwin once wrote: “The paradox of education is precisely this: that as one begins to become conscious one begins to examine the society in which [they are] being educated.” As an educator, President Kumar should embrace efforts by students to evaluate “diverse and sometimes contradictory ideas and opinions.” Furthermore, the president should trust in the Senate’s rigorous and democratic process and the resolutions that it has achieved.

We urge President Kumar and the Tufts administration to meaningfully engage with and actualize the resolutions passed by the Senate.

This op-ed was written by Nick Ambeliotis (CEE, ‘25), Fatima Rahman (STEM Education, ‘27), Genesis Perez (English, ‘27) and Rumeysa Ozturk (CSHD, ‘25) and is endorsed by 32 other Tufts School of Engineering and Arts and Sciences Graduate Students.

[/end article]
...

Hmmmm, so:

1. Tufts University’s response to TCU Senate resolutions was dismissive and inadequate.
2. President Kumar’s condescending tone undermined student voice and free speech.
3. University mischaracterized Senate resolutions as divisive, ignoring their democratic process.
4. Administration failed to engage with demands to acknowledge Palestinian issues and divest.
5. Response contradicted Tufts’ stated values of critical thinking and civic engagement.

For this great crime of lobbying the university, Zio-propaganda group Canary Mission doxxed her, and Trump's gestapo men grabbed her off the street and threw her in jail.

Zio-tard Trump made this happen as he signed the "hate speech will get you deported" EO on his first day in office.

"Thou shall not say anything ZOG doesn't want you to say."

Oath of office be damned. I mean, he's not a lawyer, am I right?

Next up, war with Iran.

So much winning.

We've had a lot of Islamic terrorists attacks on US soil.

What's your alternative solution?

Let people incite terrorist attacks or let the terrorists win and they force us to change our foreign policy through terrorist attacks?

 

[acptulsa]

We've had a lot of Islamic terrorists attacks on US soil.

Have we? The biggest one alleged to have been Islamic was a false flag operation.

Suppose Israel did that? I'd feel like a damned fool supporting them as a result.

 

[nikcers]

Have we? The biggest one alleged to have been Islamic was a false flag operation.

Suppose Israel did that? I'd feel like a damned fool supporting them as a result.

The biggest one?

There have been many. Suicide bombs and IED devices, the Boston bomber, attacks on global shipping, attacks against the Navy, night club attacks, hostage warfare. Attacks on US military bases. Stabbings and beheadings.

There have been hundreds in the last few decades.

Even in Afghanistan when we were leaving we had over a dozen US military blown up in a terrorist attack.

I know that not all of these attacks aren't real. So even if you believe the biggest one was fake what about the second or the third biggest? What about the fourth or fifth?

I dont have any credible evidence that any of the attacks were fake. The only thing I have seen is that they were Saudi nationals in the 9/11 attacks. That doesnt even make the whole nation guilty of doing it though.

Just like if you did a terrorist attack on another country you can't blame the entire United States for doing it.

 

[wizardwatson]

We've had a lot of Islamic terrorists attacks on US soil.

What's your alternative solution?

Let people incite terrorist attacks or let the terrorists win and they force us to change our foreign policy through terrorist attacks?

Only in this new reality of bot-infested, ZOG-funded, Ukro-nazi hellscape known as "social media" is someone exercising their free speech on American soil "inciting terrorist attacks".

DHS doesn't care about crime. Apparently, they work for AIPAC now. Izrahell likes terror, so does the U.S. Why else would we fund it through operations like Operation Timber Sycamore?

The lifeblood of support of Takfiri 'Islamist' militants comes from the West.

What is "Takfiri"? It's the arabic word for "apostate". In other words, fake.

This is America, supporter of:
1. Fake Christians
2. Fake Jews
3. Fake Muslims

The intended victims of this operation are:
1. Real christians
2. Real jews
3. Real muslims

Because real peace comes from God and the powers that be hate God.

 

[acptulsa]

What is "Takfiri"? It's the arabic word for "apostate". In other words, fake.

This is America, supporter of:
1. Fake Christians
2. Fake Jews
3. Fake Muslims

The intended victims of this operation are:
1. Real christians
2. Real jews
3. Real muslims

Because real peace comes from God and the powers that be hate God.

And, of course, the main reason they hate God is because real peace comes from Him.

 

[nikcers]

Only in this new reality of bot-infested, ZOG-funded, Ukro-nazi hellscape known as "social media" is someone exercising their free speech on American soil "inciting terrorist attacks".

DHS doesn't care about crime. Apparently, they work for AIPAC now. Izrahell likes terror, so does the U.S. Why else would we fund it through operations like Operation Timber Sycamore?

The lifeblood of support of Takfiri 'Islamist' militants comes from the West.

What is "Takfiri"? It's the arabic word for "apostate". In other words, fake.

This is America, supporter of:
1. Fake Christians
2. Fake Jews
3. Fake Muslims

The intended victims of this operation are:
1. Real christians
2. Real jews
3. Real muslims

Because real peace comes from God and the powers that be hate God.

America's foreign policy is zionist. Since without our intervention the state of Israel wouldn't exist.

Since Woodrow Wilson got us involved in World War 1 and the Ottoman empire sided with Germany and they lost.

We made the world safe for democracy and Israel is a democracy that emerged out of World War 1 and 2.

We created the world in which Israel emerged from when there was a new world order after world war 2.

So being anti zionist in the USA is the same as hating America. Inciting terrorist attacks and protests that influence our politics is just a 5th generation terrorist attack.