DeMint: "Divided party" if GOP doesn't listen to Ron Paul (tube added)

DeMint is trying to win non-believers over by stating that domestic economic policy is more important than foreign policy, especially if you look at the enormous outlays tied to the mandatory spending responsibilities. Even DeMint admitted as much in his book. If you don't curb expenditures and stop currency manipulation, we won't have a defense force period. Many people don't understand this. You could eradicate the DoD completely and we'd still be running a deficit.

I'd like to give Jim the benefit here and believe this (bolded). Other than his book, has he stated this publicly? Does his book really state this?
 
I think some of these people are trying to get RP to modify his views in exchange for an endorsement.

It ain't gonna happen. The minute he did that, the media would be all over him for be a hypocrite/flip-flopper.

RP's integrity is his most valuable asset and it's not for sale!
 
When people like DeMint say that they "agree with Ron's fiscal policy but not his foreign policy", it really shows that they don't agree with his fiscal policy either.

Foreign policy IS a fiscal issue. 4 trillion dollars of debt over the past 10 years on useless wars that have made us less safe.

This^

Anyone who says they support fiscal responsibility, balanced budgets, and low taxes but also supports our existing foreign policy is either:

1. a liar;
or
2. lacks basic math skills.
 
If DeMitt thinks the GOP will be divided if they don't listen to Dr. Paul, why won't he himself endorse him now and backup his claims? He's got to "walk the talk".
 
When people like DeMint say that they "agree with Ron's fiscal policy but not his foreign policy", it really shows that they don't agree with his fiscal policy either.

Foreign policy IS a fiscal issue. 4 trillion dollars of debt over the past 10 years on useless wars that have made us less safe.
AMEN! That's exactly right. He's saying the exact same stuff Hannity and Palin says, so it's in one ear and out the other.

Demint is starting to be remind me of that girl in High School. When she walks by she winks and smiles at you. She's always telling her friends how cute, funny, and smart she thinks you are to the point where everyone in school suspects she really likes you. But nothing ever comes of it because she's the girl of the star quarterback, and it just wouldn't look right for her to be with you.
 
Last edited:
This^

Anyone who says they support fiscal responsibility, balanced budgets, and low taxes but also supports our existing foreign policy is either:

1. a liar;
or
2. lacks basic math skills.

I don't think DeMint has ever said he agrees with the current foreign policy. Just because he disagrees with Ron's stance, doesn't automatically mean he agrees with the current policy. I'm hopeful that he will come around, but if people harrangue and insult him instead of encourage him, I can guarantee he'll run in the opposite direction. We need to show a little more patience with people and let them come over in their own way and in their own time. It behooves this movement to be encouraging and informative to the slow movers.
 
I'd like to give Jim the benefit here and believe this (bolded). Other than his book, has he stated this publicly? Does his book really state this?

I'll find the quote. But he stated in his book, that he no longer believes foreign policy supersedes domestic policy anymore. He gets it unlike some of these republican voters. That's why he tried to sneak through a senate version of Ron's intact Federal Reserve transparency bill via a parliamentary exploit.
 
Last edited:
This^

Anyone who says they support fiscal responsibility, balanced budgets, and low taxes but also supports our existing foreign policy is either:

1. a liar;
or
2. lacks basic math skills.

Reminds me of my father's words of advice about the lottery. . . Dad always said, "the Lottery is a tax on people who can't do math."
 
Don't try to alienate people like Jim DeMint. We can't just be arbitrarily rejecting the support, even soft support, because the person doing the supporting disagrees with one or two of RP's points. Sometimes people around here seem to be saying that anyone who does not agree with Ron Paul on every single issue is completely unworthy of our time. Even if it's a big issue they disagree on, we should embrace people on the fence, not ostracize and shun them.

Considering how many politicians and pundits out there are quite happy to call RP a joke and a fraud, we should be thankful for people like DeMint, because he clearly takes RP and his ideas seriously.

I agree.
 
Back
Top