Deliberate Exclusion of Ron Paul - Relentless Email Bomb!

fireworks_god

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
690
This has already been posted but we need a coordinated effort. We've had success taking on the MSM before when they either lie or omit stuff regarding Ron Paul, and this has to stop.

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/votes/index.html

The excuse that they only have enough space to cover candidates that are doing so well won't fly because Ron Paul is beating both Giuliani and Fred Thompson. What they are doing is effectively making it look like Ron Paul is NOT a candidate. :mad:

This is what I sent to [email protected]

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/votes/index.html

I can't help but notice your intentional omission of Ron Paul on the Republican side for the results of the primaries thus far. Ron Paul beat both Giuliani and Fred Thompson in MI last night, beat Giuliani in Iowa, and beat Fred Thompson in NH. When you total up the votes from all primaries, Ron Paul is fourth, ahead of Giuliani and Fred Thompson.

Why then, the obvious, intentional omission of Ron Paul in your reporting? Is there any substansive basis for this? Any chance I could get an honest report back on this? I'm noticing a distinct lack of ethics being displayed in the New York Times. This certainly isn't honest reporting of the facts. Considering that your role as journalists directly influences Presidental elections, I would be one to think that your organization should be charged with sedition.

I'm going to be contacting them every single day until they fix this. This is intolerable, and we need to take action. We also need to find other MSM outlets that are doing this exact same thing. The fact that Ron Paul is not being included even though he is beating TWO candidates they do list by a good margin is senseless and deliberate.
 
Vote count after IA, WY, NH and MI:
Romney - 441,602 - 37%
McCain - 359,882 - 30%
Huckabee - 206,575 - 17%
Paul - 84,082 - 7%
Thompson - 50,847 - 4%
Giuliani - 48,857 - 4%
 
Hmmm... I emailed them a letter expressing my concern of the omission of Dr. Paul's name. Now, I am unable to get on that site, unless I click on the above link in the first post. It says that the server has been told not to give me access.....
 
Screw that!! Action !!:

Web Editor: [email protected]
Martin Nisenholtz, the Sr. V.P. of Digital Operations [email protected]

# LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
E-mail to [email protected].

# OP-ED/EDITORIAL
For information on Op-Ed submissions, call (212) 556-1831 or send article to [email protected]. To write to the editorial page editor, send to [email protected].

# NEWS DEPARTMENT
To send comments and suggestions (about news coverage only) or to report errors that call for correction, e-mail [email protected] or leave a message at 1-888-NYT-NEWS.

The Editors
[email protected]
[email protected]

The Newsroom
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
 
Jeeez. Here we go again with this bullshit. They are going to keep doing this crap. They will tolerate all our emails and phone calls so long as the American people are kept from the truth.

I really wish we had enough dedicated people to start organizing mass protest marches in front of these decietful news outlets.

What the news outlets are doing is no better than what the civil rights activists had to put up with in the 60's.

The 1st amendment protects the MSM and lets them print lies and distort the truth, but the 1st amendment also lets us PROTEST in person, not by emails and phonecalls. We need to SHAME them. Am I wrong here ?

Wishfull thinking I guess. Right ?

Bump.
 
Last edited:
Call to action! This is just unbelievable. NY Times is a disgrace.
 
Left Message

Hello I have some breaking news for you, you have a guy running for Pres. maybe you should look into it. He is RON PAUL. Have a good day.
 
Oh, I am livid. I kept my composure, but I let them know on the message that I was very angry. This is obviously a deliberate exclusion. I hammered them politely. I told them I respected their right to print anything they wanted, but for them to exclude a candidate based on idealogical differences was a disservice to the American people. I pointed out that with Ron Paul having 2 delegates already, and Rudy having none, and Ron having beaten Rudy so far in two different states left no justification for having Rudy on the chart, but not Ron Paul.

I am SO SICK OF THIS B.S.!

Seriously, I'm glad we're catching the media in the act on all this, because once the election dust settles they're going to have a lot of explaining to do and we have to hold their feet to the fire!
 
Back
Top