Deliberate Exclusion of Ron Paul - Relentless Email Bomb!

[firebirdnation]

Bump

 

[firebirdnation]

canned response:

Thank you for contacting the Public Editor. An associate or I read everymessage. Because of the volume of e-mail, we cannot respond personally toevery message, but we forward many messages to appropriate newsroomstaffers and follow up to be sure concerns raised in those messages aretreated with serious consideration. If a further reply is warranted, youwill be hearing from us shortly. Some messages to the Public Editor may be published in his column oronline. Please let us know if you do not want your message published. Requests for corrections should be submitted to [email protected]. If youare dissatisfied with the response, please let us know. When referring to a specific article, please include its date, section andheadline.

 

[freedom-maniac]

Bump for freedom!

 

[dawnbt]

bump

 

[hillertexas]

bump

 

[Molly1]

wow Ron Paul did 7 percent in three primaries with 84,000 votes.

YOU ROCK MICHIGAN!!!!

Good work considering there is total media blackout and this is now a word of mouth campaign.

 

[acptulsa]

Wall Street Journal did the same thing. I emailed NYT and asked if they were trying to sink to Mr. Murdoch's level (the fat foreigner owns the Post). I emailed the WSJ (another Murdoch property) and suggested that they are embarassing themselves by naming someone (Thompson) who didn't do as well as He Who Must Not Be Named. I recommended that they never name any candidate in the future who doesn't manage to beat He Who Must Not Be Named for the benefit of their own credibility.

 

[TonySutton]

I honestly wonder if we could file a class action lawsuit against the media for this. Any good lawyers out there?

 

[gb13]

bump

 

[fireworks_god]

Thank you for contacting NYTimes.com.

We appreciate your feedback and have passed it along to the appropriate department, who will look into resolving this issue.

In the future, to send comments and suggestions (about news coverage only) or to report errors that call for correction, e-mail [email protected], or leave a message at 1889-NYT-NEWS.

We hope this helps. Please let us know if you have further questions or concerns.


Regards,


Robert Peterson
NYTimes.com
Customer Service
www.nytimes./help

Come on, let's keep hitting them! The only reason they get away with this is because no one ever calls them on it. We need to show them that they are held to a higher standard than they have sunk to! The mainstream media only gets away with this because people have let them in the past!

This exclusion was deliberate and calculated. There is no formula that excuses this beyond the exclude Ron Paul forum. Fortunately for us, Ron Paul still exists, and we'll prove it.

 

[Thanehand]

Emailed.

I also added this to Digg:

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/NYTimes_Manipulates_Delegate_Vote_Count_Excludes_Ron_Paul

 

[hillertexas]

Emailed.

I also added this to Digg:

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/NYTimes_Manipulates_Delegate_Vote_Count_Excludes_Ron_Paul

dugg

 

[thechitowncubs]

I got my email forwarded to the right department...

right.

 

[Thom1776]

Three Percent Rudy

 

[Am3RiCaN_microcosm]

My message that I just sent:

Allow me to procede directly to the point. The flagrant blanket-omission of Ron Paul's presidential campaign from the NYT is as transparent as it is shameful. Do not expect the 'fringe candiate' explaination to appease the masses this time - such arguments are a waste of time and insulting by nature. Ron Paul has the fourth most votes of any GOP candidate thus far, and is comfortably ahead of both Rudy and Fred. I am curious what sort of Orwellian double-speak you will contrive to excuse yourselves from your own journalistic responsibility THIS time. I expect such behavior from FOX News, but certainly not a reputable organization like the NYT. Did Rupert Murdoch recently come on board?


- A Concerned Reader

 

[fireworks_god]

[email protected]

[email protected]

617-929-2000


Here's the ACTUAL results:

Romney 337,847 39% 23
McCain 257,521 30% 6
Huckabee 139,699 16% 1
Paul 54,434 6% 0
Thompson 32,135 4% 0
Giuliani 24,706 3% 0
Uncommitted 17,971 2%
Hunter 2,823 0% 0
100% of precincts reporting

http://graphics.boston.com/globe/acrobat/today.jpeg

That's the link for the image of their completely inaccurate information. I can't send them something right now but will as soon as I can. Everyone hit these people too! Let them know we are aware of their lack of journalistic integrity.

 

[Molly1]

That's the link for the image of their completely inaccurate information. I can't send them something right now but will as soon as I can. Everyone hit these people too! Let them know we are aware of their lack of journalistic integrity. *SNIP[/QUOTE]

Boston Globe is owned by the New York Times.:rolleyes:

 

[JahWarrior]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=91766

 

[Crickett]

Wall Street Journal did the same thing. I emailed NYT and asked if they were trying to sink to Mr. Murdoch's level (the fat foreigner owns the Post). I emailed the WSJ (another Murdoch property) and suggested that they are embarassing themselves by naming someone (Thompson) who didn't do as well as He Who Must Not Be Named. I recommended that they never name any candidate in the future who doesn't manage to beat He Who Must Not Be Named for the benefit of their own credibility.

I was so freaked when I saw this ad this morning. HOW could they have congratulated the winner of 4th place, and it not be RP!? I guess they print a retraction on page 86 in the fold.

 

[fireworks_god]

Blump.