tangent4ronpaul
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 21,101
looks like one Republican is voting against the Boehner amendment... I wonder who that would be...?
I think we all know...
pretty much as I predicted... along party lines...
-t
Debate for National Health Care Starts on the House Floor @ 1030 EST / 0730PST 11/7
- Thread starter HOLLYWOOD
- Start date
I think we all know...
pretty much as I predicted... along party lines...
-t
tangent4ronpaul
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 21,101
BRACE FOR BAD NEWS!
-t
-t
Gah! You beat me to it!
Original_Intent
Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2007
- Messages
- 9,381
Yep I am braced for impact I expect this PoS is a done deal. In 2010 We have to elect people that will undo this monstrosity. We have got to quit accepting that once something is passed that we are just stuck with it.
low preference guy
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,097
I am a supporter of Paul, but there is one thing I don't understand. Why would he vote against the Boehner amendment, considering that it is better than the current bill? After all, he voted for the pro-life amendment, which made the bill slightly less bad. Could someone please explain the apparent inconsistency?
I'm guessing Paul DID vote for the Boehner amendment...can anyone confirm this?
GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
jenafern
RT @AlBoeNEWS: UPDATE -- Republican Rep. Timothy Johnson was the lone Republican to vote against GOP Alternative
RT @AlBoeNEWS: UPDATE -- Republican Rep. Timothy Johnson was the lone Republican to vote against GOP Alternative
GunnyFreedom
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 32,882
So it would appear. If RP voted for it, then it must have been less unconstitutional than I thought
low preference guy
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,097
I think he just voted for the lesser evil.
200 pages of any bill is too much for me to digest. If RP did vote for it, he has some explaining to do.
pcosmar
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 54,940
Perhaps, and I would not presume to speak for Dr. Paul.
If the Stupak amendment had failed some Dems would have voted against The ObamaCare bill.
By letting the Stupak bill pass it guaranteed passage of ObamaCare.
Edit ,Oops wrong amendment.
Last edited:
Voting for the lesser evil is still voting for evil.
low preference guy
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 16,097
If I had two options: get shot in the face or get punched in the face, I would choose to get punched in the face.
I think he voted for the amendment because it wasnt as bad. However, he still would have voted against the Bill.
tangent4ronpaul
Banned
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 21,101
And this MORON has not connected medical errors to suing doctors/hospitals...
15 MILLION medical errors per day... population of the USA 308 Million... do the math... sooo one in 20 people are under medical care where the doc fucks up - EVERY DAY - RRRRIIIGHHHTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-t
15 MILLION medical errors per day... population of the USA 308 Million... do the math... sooo one in 20 people are under medical care where the doc fucks up - EVERY DAY - RRRRIIIGHHHTTTTTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-t
Similar threads
