Gary Johnson Daniel Hannan, British MEP, on Gary Johnson

tsai3904

Member
Joined
May 13, 2010
Messages
9,397
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/d...n-candidate-to-have-sought-the-us-presidency/

I’m tired of hearing about the supposed dearth of talent in the Republican Party. What about Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Herman Cain, Tim Pawlenty, Mitch McConnell, Jim DeMint, Chris Christie or Scott Walker?

And here’s someone you might not yet know about, a sea-green incorruptible who is surely the most anti-government candidate ever to have sought the GOP presidential nomination: Gary Johnson, twice governor of New Mexico.

Gary Johnson’s philosophy is easily summarized. He thinks the state is far too big. He wants to balance the federal budget – not 20 years from now, but immediately – and has identified the requisite spending cuts. He understands that an adventurist foreign policy, as well as being expensive, diminishes domestic liberty: that there is a contradiction, in Russell Kirk’s phrase, between an American Republic and an American Empire. Accordingly, he was against the attacks on Iraq and Libya and, though he supported the overthrow of the Taliban, he opposed the elaboration and prolongation of the US mission in Afghanistan.

Gary Johnson is a libertarian on social issues, grasping that the American constitution rests tacitly on tolerance, privacy and equality before the law (see above clip). He was unusual among Republicans in strenuously resisting the various erosions of civil liberties carried out under the guise of anti-terrorism legislation. He sees the “war on drugs” as a misapplication of state power. In short, he believes in personal freedom, states’ rights and the US Constitution.

Alright, you might be saying, so he’s a libertarian. So are thousands of Ayn Rand-reading students around the world. No one holding these views ever gets elected to anything important.

That’s where you’d be wrong. Gary Johnson was elected on precisely such a manifesto in the swing state of New Mexico, and promptly set about putting his beliefs into practice. He took the view that there should be as few laws as possible, and vetoed more legislation during his term than the other 49 state governors put together. He cut taxes 14 times and never raised them once. Result? A budget surplus and an economic boom. During Gary Johnson’s gubernatorial term, 1,200 state jobs were axed, but 20,000 private sector jobs were created. And here’s the best bit: he was handsomely re-elected, despite a two-to-one Democrat majority.

The fragility of the US economy is perhaps the gravest threat to world prosperity. Heaven knows the White House needs someone who can balance the books. Well, my American friends, if you’re looking for a president with the gimcrack charisma of a Blair or a Clinton, stick to the incumbent. But if you’re looking for someone who has shown that he can cut government spending, ecce homo.

This was his response to someone asking why he omitted Ron Paul:

I have blogged before about the good doctor:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danielhannan/100010607/the-politician-who-cannot-tell-a-lie/

I like and admire him, I supported last bid (as did Gary Johnson, I think) and I've even spoken at a Campaign for Liberty conference.

This, though, is a blog about someone else.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So basically he supports Tea Party lite.

Rubio, Ryan, Cain, Pawnlenty, and McConnell?

Hannan is a shill.

Johnson on foreign policy: http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/04/21/gary-johnson-caveat-emptor/

Johnson on Drug War: He explains legalizing cannabis as a cost-benefit analysis, not an issue of protecting liberty or self ownership. He expressly says that he does not advocate the legalization of other drugs.

Johnson on NOT closing Guantanmo: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/86709.html
 
I support Gary too, just not as much as I support Ron. He really should try for senate.
 
So basically he supports Tea Party lite.

Rubio, Ryan, Cain, Pawnlenty, and McConnell?

Hannan is a shill.

Johnson on foreign policy: http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/04/21/gary-johnson-caveat-emptor/

Johnson on Drug War: He explains legalizing cannabis as a cost-benefit analysis, not an issue of protecting liberty or self ownership. He expressly says that he does not advocate the legalization of other drugs.

Johnson on NOT closing Guantanmo: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/86709.html

Thank you. Great post.
 




I think there is another video floating out there from a couple of years ago where he said he supported Ron or something to that effect.
 
I’m tired of hearing about the supposed dearth of talent in the Republican Party. What about Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Herman Cain, Tim Pawlenty, Mitch McConnell, Jim DeMint, Chris Christie or Scott Walker?

Excuse me, but what the hell? He didn't mention Ron Paul at all. What's up with that? Then, he lists a bunch of status quo establishment politicians, with the exception of DeMint.

I honestly don't get this. He used to be all pro-Paul.
 
Daniel Hannan has always been very generous with his praise of establishment politicians and media personalities who pretend to be reformers. It reminds me of Judge Nap on Freedom Watch. It's a way to get in good with powerful people, I suppose.
 
How depressing. Seems like most everyone out there is a sellout shithead. :(
 
It looks like Hannan is one of those people who thinks that it's libertarian for the government to push the gay agenda and to prevent sovereign states from having laws against murder.
 
It looks like Hannan is one of those people who thinks that it's libertarian for the government to push the gay agenda and to prevent sovereign states from having laws against murder.

Exactly what I was thinking. How "european" of him to think that way.
 
So basically he supports Tea Party lite.

Rubio, Ryan, Cain, Pawnlenty, and McConnell?

Hannan is a shill.

Johnson on foreign policy: http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2011/04/21/gary-johnson-caveat-emptor/

Johnson on Drug War: He explains legalizing cannabis as a cost-benefit analysis, not an issue of protecting liberty or self ownership. He expressly says that he does not advocate the legalization of other drugs.

Johnson on NOT closing Guantanmo: http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/86709.html

Actually, something Hannan said before made me think the one place he disagrees with Ron is on empire/managed trade. Gary's greater flexibility, which most here see as lesser principles, is more convenient to corporatists, clearly.,
 
I don't see the big issue, Hanann blogged in support of Gary. Its not like hes bashing Paul in doing so. He even clarifies by just saying the blog is about someone else. Geez what should nobody be able to support Gary Johnson?
 
I don't see the big issue, Hanann blogged in support of Gary. Its not like hes bashing Paul in doing so. He even clarifies by just saying the blog is about someone else. Geez what should nobody be able to support Gary Johnson?

It's better to support GJ than any other candidate other than RP.

But to call him the most anti-government person ever to seek the GOP nomination, when there's somebody more anti-government who's currently polling something like 20 times better than Johnson is worth a criticism or two.
 
Not sure if this is actually Daniel Hannan but someone is responding as him in the comments section:

danielhannan
Today 02:17 PM

I am a huge Ron Paul fan, and supported his bid last time; as, indeed, did Gary Johnson.

libertarianlou
Today 11:53 AM

Interesting, I will look him up.

You forgot Ron Paul though ;-)

danielhannan
Today 12:17 PM

No I didn't. But when you look at their views on abortion, gays etc, I think GJ just edges it as the more libertarian of the two.
 
Back
Top