PaulConventionWV
Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2011
- Messages
- 16,041
Yes, you're undoubtedly right, and that being the case- I wonder how this travesty of justice was able to reach the newspapers at all. To intimidate others, I see that, but it also threw a spotlight on the curative powers of the seeds and a highly damaging spotlight on the falsity/worthlessness of their "cures".
Hmm. NOT rational at all -but then, neither are they, the drug pushers...right?![]()
![]()
No, it doesn't really cast light on the curative powers of the seeds. I don't see why you would assume that. Rather, it reinforces the message that big pharma is all you have. It only damages the falsity/worthlessness of their "cures" if people then go and research it just because they saw something about it in a newspaper, which is highly unlikely. A "spotlight" would be putting actual evidence of the benefits of B17 or the harms of big pharma in the newspaper, not just some guy getting arrested for selling something he shouldn't be selling. You are reallly reachhing for conclusions by thinking that one or a couple newspaper articles is going to "cast a spotlight" on something that runs much deeper.