Dad was in Canada for eight years- that is enough time. Mom was only there three years before Jr. was born.
Well, I already know I'm being lied to, because reading Cruz spokesman's statement, it says Cruz mother was
never a Canadian citizen, that it wasn't possible, but just accepting the law you quoted that Canada has, and
assuming that is is the same as in 1970, she was definitely there long enough to have Canadian citizenship.
They obviously don't want to admit even that, because it still affects Cruz's birth - they are definitely lying that under the law, she
never could have been a Canadian. Why?
The path to Cruz being a US citizen is hanging on the barest of threads. He is born in Canada. His father is a Canadian, and before that a Cuban, and doesn't want to be a US citizen. Cruz is given a Canadian citizenship at birth, and both parents are on the electoral rolls for Canadian elections. Were they citizens or did they commit voter fraud?
There is almost no path left for Cruz to have been natural born an American. Under the law of the US until very recently, there is no argument Cruz is not natural born. If you try to argue that he is one under recent law (well passed when the Constitution was made), because the mother retained her citizenship, you run into all types of problems, because these laws have all types of exceptions to them.
Here's some problems with this - likely wrong - meaning of natural born being met requirements:
- Mothers married to citizens who have children that are citizens have in the past gotten citizenship because of that. If, as you claim, they both didn't get citizenship at the same time, she may have gotten citizenship automatically through being a wife and mother. Ted Cruz has a Canadian birth certificate - and it indicates Canadia doesn't think Cruz is American. US servicemen with their wives oversees don't get these.
- Under traditional rules going back to common law, children born abroad whose parents didn't retain citizenship, lose it. It doesn't matter if Cruz's mother was or wasn't a citizen of Canada at that time. If Cruz was a Canadian citizen, and she renounced hers, he isn't also an American.
- The common law book I quoted above shows that dual citizenship was never recognized until very recently. It's a huge problem that is outside the scope of this thread, but by no stretch of the imagination would the natural born clause have included the concept of dual citizenship in it - it was specifically written to excludes such things, besides the fact the whole concept is very recent, way past when the Constitution was signed. Cruz has a Canadian birth certificate.
- She's on the electoral rolls for Canadian elections as an elector. There's no reason to automatically believe what a Cruz spokesman said after that.
At this point, with Cruz having a Canadian birth certificate, Cruz renouncing his citizenship for his presidential run, his father not denying his own Canadian citizenship, and the mother on electoral rolls for Canadian elections, Cruz needs to prove that he is a natural born citizen. The burden is on Cruz to prove it, not for us to assume it. And there is sufficient and reasonable proof to bring this into court - where it has already been brought. It is hardly a meritless case, and in court, full power of discovery and putting people under oath can be used.