Crazy conpiracy about mystery NAFTA superhighway.

Somebody make a video connecting American Hero Ross Perot, his sucking off sound to 69, the NAU, and Rudy that traitor and his 70 million aipac sumbiatch.
 
People, I-69 is not the "NAFTA Super Highway", lets clear that up. It is a separate project no real different than the highways put in over the last 50 years, in fact it has been planned since the 80s or before.


I-69 goes from Corpus Cristi, to Houston, through LA, MS, TN, KY, IN, and MI.


Posted: September 10, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Official Mexican government reports reveal Mexico has entered discussions with the state of Texas and top officials in the Bush administration to extend the Trans-Texas Corridor into Mexico, with a plan to connect through Monterrey to the deep-water Mexican ports on the Pacific, including Manzanillo and Lazaro Cardenas.

Gov. Gonzales Paras and U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters at Transportes Olympic in February 2007.

The official website of the Mexican northeastern state of Nuevo León contain multiple reports that José Natividad Gonzáles Parás, governor of the Mexican state of Nuevo León, has actively discussed with numerous U.S. government officials, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the extension of the Trans-Texas Corridor into Mexico to create what's called a "Trans North America Corridor."


Gonzales_Paras.jpg

Gov. Gonzales Paras and U.S. Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters at Transportes Olympic in February 2007.

In an August trip to Mexico, Perry made news in U.S. media by calling the idea of building a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border "idiocy."

Largely unreported in the American press were meetings Perry held in Mexico with Gonzáles Parás in which the two discussed extending the corridor into Mexico.

In their private meetings, the pair thoroughly discussed extending TTC-35 into Mexico, according to a report on the government's site.

Official Mexican government reports reveal Mexico has entered discussions with the state of Texas and top officials in the Bush administration to extend the Trans-Texas Corridor into Mexico, with a plan to connect through Monterrey to the deep-water Mexican ports on the Pacific, including Manzanillo and Lazaro Cardenas.

The official website of the Mexican northeastern state of Nuevo León contain multiple reports that José Natividad Gonzáles Parás, governor of the Mexican state of Nuevo León, has actively discussed with numerous U.S. government officials, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the extension of the Trans-Texas Corridor into Mexico to create what's called a "Trans North America Corridor."

In an August trip to Mexico, Perry made news in U.S. media by calling the idea of building a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border "idiocy."

Largely unreported in the American press were meetings Perry held in Mexico with Gonzáles Parás in which the two discussed extending the corridor into Mexico.

In their private meetings, the pair thoroughly discussed extending TTC-35 into Mexico, according to a report on the government's site.

In an interview prior to Perry's visit, Gonzáles Parás made it clear the extension of TTC-35 into Mexico would be a discussed during Perry's time there.

"We have had interaction with the governor of Texas," Gonzáles Parás said. "We have had a very productive relationship with Rick Perry, who is also interested in what we can do to continue that which is known as the Trans-Texas Corridor, that in reality is the corridor of North America, the Trans North America Corridor, that includes railroads, bridges, passenger automobile highways, and truck highway lanes."

Gonzáles Parás further explained the extension of TTC-35 into Mexico would connect through Monterrey, a city which he suggested would function as a hub for truck-freight traffic. Monterrey is the capital of Nuevo León.

"One of the themes that merited the most attention on the part of the two governors was the development of the infrastructure needed for the competitive development of the region as it relates to developing the Trans-Texas Corridor in connection with the project we call the Corridor of Northeastern Mexico," the Nuevo León government website reported Gonzáles Parás saying Sept. 1, at the conclusion of Perry's visit.

Gonzáles Parás is reportedly pursuing plans to establish Monterrey as an "inland port" where international container freight cargo, largely delivered into Mexico via the Mexican ports on the Pacific, could be transported via a Trans North America Corridor into the United States via Laredo, Texas.

Once on I-35, the Mexican trucks transporting the Chinese containers could travel north, heading toward U.S. inland ports, such as WND has previously reported are being established by the Free Trade Alliance San Antonio in San Antonio and in Kansas City by the Kansas City SmartPort.

nasco.jpg


On May 24, Gonzáles Parás announced during his recent meetings in Austin, Perry had agreed the envisioned Trans North America Corridor would pass through Laredo and connect with San Antonio, just as Mexico ultimately planned to extend the superhighway south into Colombia.

"We have also worked in Monterrey to create an inland port, a metropolitan center for moving rapidly the commercial traffic from Monterrey to the inland port at San Antonio," Gonzáles Parás said in the state-published interview."For this strategic project to be accomplished, we have been working with the federal government in Mexico and well as holding discussions with the secretary of transportation and the secretary of state in the United States."

WND has previously reported similar comments made by Gonzáles Parás at a Feb. 22 press conference in Mexico that first announced Transportes Olympic had been selected as the first trucking firm to cross the border in the Mexican truck-demonstration project.

In speaking to the group assembled at the company's headquarters, Gonzáles Parás announced the Trans-Texas Corridor was not just the NAFTA Superhighway, but "the Logistical Trans-Corridor of North America," uniting Mexico, the United States and Canada.

He next announced the time had arrived to declare a North American Economic Community.

Gonzáles Parás explained the Trans-Texas Corridor was more accurately known in Mexico as the "Logistical Trans-Corridor of North America."

"I want to let you know how much we in this border state of Nuevo León have been working with our neighbor state of Texas," he said, "making agreements which permit us to enrich what in Texas is called the 'Trans-Texas Corridor,' but what we in Mexico know as the 'Logistical Corridor of North America.'"

"We – Canada, the United States and Mexico – have to perfect this Logistical Trans-Corridor of North America for our mutual benefit," Gonzáles Parás continued.

He expanded his vision of a Logistical Corridor of North America to include the construction of a train and truck corridor that would cut through the heart of North America.

WND has previously described as a new NAFTA Superhighway, the first segment of which is the planned four-football-fields-wide Trans-Texas Corridor which the Texas Department of Transportation plans to build parallel to Interstate 35.

WND has also reported that at the recent Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) third summit held in Montebello, Quebec, President Bush and Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper ridiculed the idea that SPP might result in the creation of a North American Union or NAFTA Superhighways.

These reports in Spanish published on the Nuevo León government website suggest that discussions about extending TTC-35 into Mexico are much further advanced that have been admitted by the Bush administration or reported upon in the U.S. mainstream media.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57548
 
Last edited:
sorry for my dumb question, but could someone please explain to me as a foreigner what exactly the problem with such a highway would be (other than with every other non privately owned road?)
 
sorry for my dumb question, but could someone please explain to me as a foreigner what exactly the problem with such a highway would be (other than with every other non privately owned road?)

1) if their is a threat of terrorist, the borders should be closed tightly, instead of plans to have mass travel.

2)a nation with no borders is no nation at all

3)The united states people desire to be a sovereign nation. We do not bow to the will of a Global society.

4)this is a part of the NAU, We want to be sovereign.

5)American citizens first, the elite are bypassing the peoples representation to further their Global goals, thus "the struggle of ideology".
 
people who are forced to give up land, independence and liberty to get a tolled highway build by Spanish contractors that will make billions because people were ignorant...
 
Some fringe groups believe in a NAFTA superhighway connecting Canada, US, and Mexico. One of these fringe groups is the Texas Department of Transportation. Here is what what the mysterious and secretive government group said on their public website:

ABOUT I-69/TTC
Interstate 69 is a planned 1,600-mile national highway connecting Mexico, the United States and Canada. Eight states are involved in the project. In Texas, I-69 will be developed under the Trans-Texas Corridor master plan.
http://ttc.keeptexasmoving.org/projects/i69/

Can you believe Ron Paul would think this "I-69" thing is real? Wow, what a conspiracy nut. Enough of these mysterious things, right! But it gets nuttier! Another fringe government group in Texas, known as the NBII, carried out a full-scale environmental impact study of a highway that is so mysterious that the LA Times knows only conspiracy nuts believe in this thing. This fringe government group even drew a map showing how this NAFTA highway connects to Mexico and said:
"The southern most portion of the proposed NAFTA Highway (I-69) will cross approximately 1,000 miles of Texas from the Mexican border to the northeastern part of the state."
http://cswgcin.nbii.gov/portal/serv...PageID=1965&mode=2&in_hi_userid=2&cached=true

Please guys, listen to what the LA Times tells us and don't listen to wacky ideas that come from fringe government group TxDOT (Texas Department of Transporation) about there being an I-69 international highway plan.

Nice.
 
Ty for your fast answers!

I completely understand, that the NAU and forced landtaking are a problem. But only with this highway? (Started watching the movie, but it's two hours)Wouldn't there still be border patrols? (Like Goods are free to cross the borders, but not all people) And wouldn't Canada and Mexico protect their other borders, or do you fear a Canadian terrorist?


And what is the problem with Spanish contractors? Do you really think that Ron Paul would agree to a claim like "American citizens first" when it comes to economic matters?
 
Last edited:
Ty for your fast answers!

I completely understand, that the NAU and forced landtaking is a problem. But only with this highway? Wouldn't there still be border patrols? (Like Goods are free to cross the borders, but not all people) And wouldn't Canada and Mexico protect their other borders, or do you fear a Canadian terrorist?


And what is the problem with Spanish contractors? Do you really think that Ron Paul would agree to a claim like "American citizens first" when it comes to economic matters?

Depend on foreign nations to secure the border?

Spanish tolling Americans in the United States?

Why American first, and does Paul believe this?

:eek:
How about reading the Monroe doctrine.

"The New World is no longer open to colonization from the Old World".

"Any attempt to influence the New World will be considered a threat"

Failure to adhere to the Monroe doctrine is the root cause of the problems My Nation faces today.

For the Record I call on the creation of the Monroe/Adams New World conservation Party.
 
Sorry, I don't wanna ruin this thread, I guess the question I really have is: How many here think that RPs "protect the border" means "from alien workers and goods". I always thought that it meant "from terrorists (and from terrorists only)". I really can't see how RP is an American-citizens-first-nationalist aka Pat Buchanan for example, and was always wondering how many here think otherwise. Maybe I should make a poll, but then I am sure there is already one and I am only too stupid to find it.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I don't wanna ruin this thread, I guess the question I really have is: How many here think that RPs "protect the border" means "from alien workers and goods". I always thought that it meant "from terrorists (and from terrorists only)". I really can't see how RP is an American-citizens-first-nationalist aka Pat Buchanan for example, and was always wondering how many here think otherwise. Maybe I should make a poll, but then I am sure there is already one and I am only too stupid to find it.

How many times does he have to say he is not an isolationist?

"Trade with people" Ron Paul

I would say that a Ron Paul trade program would benifit the people, unlike the globalist trade community.
 
How many times does he have to say he is not an isolationist?

Of course he is not, that is why I was wondering why so many of his supporters like Buchanan and are so affraid of open borders?

I would say that a Ron Paul trade program would benifit the people, unlike the globalist trade community.

But free trade means the possibility of Spanish citizens tolling Americans, doesn't it? Or how do you think would a RP trade program would look like?
 
Last edited:
another point not mentioned. Is that the US Government is bowing to other nations laws and in doing so would demand that a US citizen GIVE UP his/her land to build the highway.

sorry for my dumb question, but could someone please explain to me as a foreigner what exactly the problem with such a highway would be (other than with every other non privately owned road?)
 
I'm glad that question was asked to RP, as it is a serious issue, that we need not duck. Duncan Hunter also knows about it and is trying to stop it, as well as Tancredo.

We need to back DR. Paul and not schmucks like Medved who blatantly lie. If enough people have the balls to admit the govt is corrupt, perhaps we can stop this nightmare, and not end up like the EU. I was getting tired of our own people calling at a wacky "conpiracy theory", when the plans are in plain writing.
 
Last edited:
The way it looks to me. The plan is to clear customs in and out of Mexico in Kansas City! That would sort of make the whole corridor Mexican territory for all practical purposes.

http://www.kcsmartport.com/sec_about/section/StrategicPlan.htm

Asian freight: To Mexican ports up to KC on rail – promote it and develop it.

Exports to Mexico: Work with custom brokers on a consolidation facility.

Implement the FHWA, $200,000 and $750,000 projects on two possible test pilots: 1) Mexican customs corridor. 2) West Coast freight movements.

Coordinate the Mexican Customs Inspection facility project.
 
Sorry, I don't wanna ruin this thread, I guess the question I really have is: How many here think that RPs "protect the border" means "from alien workers and goods". I always thought that it meant "from terrorists (and from terrorists only)". I really can't see how RP is an American-citizens-first-nationalist aka Pat Buchanan for example, and was always wondering how many here think otherwise. Maybe I should make a poll, but then I am sure there is already one and I am only too stupid to find it.

You mean workers here illegally? Go down to ANY construction site....or ask any legal taxpaying contractor in the United States if people here illegally take jobs away from Americans who pay taxes. They work cheaper than Americans for cash....period and they do NOT pay taxes. I know people personally who cannot make a living against them and have lost there jobs. Jobs that Americans won't do is total BS. Its a fact and its everywhere. American citizen first? You mean legal taxpaying Americans first don't you? People that do not commit crimes and are not here illegally first? War breaks out...(a real one were America truely needs to be protected)....and see how fast those same criminals rush back across the border. No loyalty to this country at all with most. Shoe on the other foot would you fight for Mexico if you were there illegally? Yes I certainly hope he does put American citizens FIRST. People that come here legally and pay taxes are 100% ok with me...the others deserve EVERYTHING THEY GET...and I hope they get whats coming to them. People that want to PROTECT CRIMINALS in this country illegally and in any way stick up for them make me SICK!!! People that apply for citizesnship, try hard to learn the language, love America and do the right thing....I'm 100% behind them. Ron Paul is against amnesty IN ANY FORM for illegals in this country!! "American-citizens-first-nationalist" ......twist it into being some kind of racist if you like...total BS...Your the one taking up for criminals. I suppose you would like to have a borderless America were the American flag flys along side Mexico flag on America soil and Spanish is the language!!....NOT ME!!
 
Last edited:
Trans Texas Corridor & IH 69

Let me clear a few things up. I live in San Antonio and have been a member of the San Antonio Toll Party for about a year. Terri Hall started both that and Texans United for Reform & Freedom (TURF). If you want the best answers to any of these questions, contact her. She is THE thorn in the NAFTA Superhighway side.

www.satollparty.com

www.texasturf.org

IH 69 is essentially a widening of US 59 from Laredo through NE Texas that will skirt Houston around the Grand Parkway (Houston's outer and 4th freeway loop that is under construction). It's a NAFTA corridor for sure, but not the NAFTA Superhighway. It has proposed spurs through South Texas down US 281 and US 77 so that in South Texas there will be IH 69 East, IH 69 Central, and IH 69 West. It requires very little land grabbing via eminent domain and is not a big deal. It's been in the works for a long time. The biggest oppostion to this project is that it will make a currently free highway corridor into a tolled corridor. Texas is planning on tolling every inch of every interstate in the state.

The Trans-Texas Corridor is the proposed NAFTA Superhighway. It will basically parallel IH 35 (to the east) and skirt Dallas. It's planned where there are no existing roads, and will require about 500,000 acres of land be taken by eminent domain. It is designed specifically to move freight and people to major cities, and will not have exits in between. All of the farms, ranches, and small towns it disrupts will not even have access to it. There will be gas stations, restaurants and hotels in the right of way, no local businesses outside of big cities will benefit at all. Not only will it force Texans who have owned their land for generations to give up a 1/4 mile wide path through their land, getting from one side to the other just to stay on their property will be a big deal. This highway, pipeline and rail system is the first step and cornerstone of the NAFTA Superhighway. it will allow freight to go all the way from Mexico to Kansas City as the first port of entry and visit to customs. DEEP inside our borders. How's that for importing terrorists. Texas is planning on grabbing all of this land, and essentially handing it over to a Spanish company to build the road, the travel plazas, etc.. and then make the profits on it for 50 years. The land required for this is THREE TIMES the amount of land that ALL Interstates in Texas now occupy cumulatively.

The video mentioned in the other reply above, Truth Be Tolled, will explain the Trans Texas Corridor in much greater detail. Here's the link again:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...199&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=2
 
Last edited:
The way it looks to me. The plan is to clear customs in and out of Mexico in Kansas City! That would sort of make the whole corridor Mexican territory for all practical purposes.

http://www.kcsmartport.com/sec_about/section/StrategicPlan.htm

Asian freight: To Mexican ports up to KC on rail – promote it and develop it.

Exports to Mexico: Work with custom brokers on a consolidation facility.

Implement the FHWA, $200,000 and $750,000 projects on two possible test pilots: 1) Mexican customs corridor. 2) West Coast freight movements.

Coordinate the Mexican Customs Inspection facility project.

Here is another article on WND about this http://www.worldnetdaily.com:80/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50918
 
Back
Top