First, he was an angel. Just a small child, whose life was cut short by a bullet to the back while his hands were up.
Then, he was a gentle giant.
Then a video surfaced of him committing a strong-armed robbery, which is a felony.
Then a report came out that he struggled with a cop, the gun went off, and that he might not have been shot in the back.
All of these claims were IMMEDIATELY dismissed.
Then an autopsy report was released in which it was proven he was not shot in the back as was originally claimed.
This does not matter. The facts do not matter. The original claim, that he was an angel who was unjustly shot in the back, is the narrative. No facts will stand in the way of that narrative, steamrolling across America.
And I'm not even saying the cop was justified in his actions. As it stands now, I'm not sure I believe that he was. But holy funkaroni, people are COMPLETELY ignoring the facts of the case as they are currently known and refusing to deviate from their original opinion.