County investigation: Michael Brown was shot from the front, had marijuana in his system

Check out the autopsy report. I have heard that the last shots to the head were the kill shot.
and it was at an angle to suggest execution.

I don't care if he had a buzz on or not.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/...rrested-ferguson-cop-shot-mike-brown-6-times/


None of it matters, people have taken sides and facts no longer sway them.

The robbery video gave me a "gut instinct" impression of what Brown was really like, and the autopsy sealed it for me: the eyewitnesses were full of shit and the cops version was corroborated.

But the lunatics will just move the goalposts and continue on. Now, instead of being shot in the back he musta been falling foward, yeah that's it, falling toward. Uh huh.
 
That does it for me. He was a druggie. I've heard that marijuana can make you do some crazy things. Turn you into an animal. Make you run towards a cop that is shooting at you.

Hey, wait a minute. I thought they were with holding autopsy reports until a toxicology report was finished and that report would take 2-4 weeks? Lol.

His family had this report issued, I think.
 
No wound in back.

Wound in the arm that could have come while Brown had his back to Wilson. I'm sure Johnson could not know exactly where the bullet hit. "Hit him in the back" could mean that Johnson was referring to Brown having his back to Wilson because he is assuming the bullet strikes Brown's back.

None of the above matters either way because I'm saying there is no eyewitness saying what JustinTime said.
 
None of it matters, people have taken sides and facts no longer sway them.

The robbery video gave me a "gut instinct" impression of what Brown was really like, and the autopsy sealed it for me: the eyewitnesses were full of shit and the cops version was corroborated.

But the lunatics will just move the goalposts and continue on. Now, instead of being shot in the back he musta been falling foward, yeah that's it, falling toward. Uh huh.

There are people on both sides who I speculate that wouldn't even be swayed by a sworn confession because that is the belief system that they constructed their lives around. You should read how abhorrent some of the conversations are on some police forums. Conversely, you have seen a similar strain of subjectivity here. It's sickening.
 
Brown and Johnson took off running together. There were three cars lined up along the side of the street. Johnson says he ducked behind the first car, whose two passengers were screaming. Crouching down a bit, he watched Brown run past.

This has always puzzled me.Who are they,where are they?They would be ringside witnesses to this and after Johnson's video testimony on (I think) the next day after the shooting,I have not heard anything about them from anybody.

Also,in all the videos of the crime scene just after the shooting,You see Brown,the cop car with the open door with crime scene tape around them and no cars between or near them.
Were they moved?Never existed?
 
None of it matters, people have taken sides and facts no longer sway them.

The robbery video gave me a "gut instinct" impression of what Brown was really like, and the autopsy sealed it for me: the eyewitnesses were full of shit and the cops version was corroborated.

But the lunatics will just move the goalposts and continue on. Now, instead of being shot in the back he musta been falling foward, yeah that's it, falling toward. Uh huh.

First, he was an angel. Just a small child, whose life was cut short by a bullet to the back while his hands were up.
Then, he was a gentle giant.
Then a video surfaced of him committing a strong-armed robbery, which is a felony.
Then a report came out that he struggled with a cop, the gun went off, and that he might not have been shot in the back.
All of these claims were IMMEDIATELY dismissed.
Then an autopsy report was released in which it was proven he was not shot in the back as was originally claimed.
This does not matter. The facts do not matter. The original claim, that he was an angel who was unjustly shot in the back, is the narrative. No facts will stand in the way of that narrative, steamrolling across America.

And I'm not even saying the cop was justified in his actions. As it stands now, I'm not sure I believe that he was. But holy funkaroni, people are COMPLETELY ignoring the facts of the case as they are currently known and refusing to deviate from their original opinion.
 
Well that's not what the eyewitnesses said happened. Correct me if I'm wrong here but the people at the scene say either A) Brown was running with his hands up B) or, he was charging at the cop.

None of it matters, people have taken sides and facts no longer sway them.

...the autopsy sealed it for me:


So a Youtube video and a simple diagram of an autopsy seal it for you? Are you swayed by facts that you can't even get right?
 
First, he was an angel. Just a small child, whose life was cut short by a bullet to the back while his hands were up.
Then, he was a gentle giant.
Then a video surfaced of him committing a strong-armed robbery, which is a felony.
Then a report came out that he struggled with a cop, the gun went off, and that he might not have been shot in the back.
All of these claims were IMMEDIATELY dismissed.
Then an autopsy report was released in which it was proven he was not shot in the back as was originally claimed.
This does not matter. The facts do not matter. The original claim, that he was an angel who was unjustly shot in the back, is the narrative. No facts will stand in the way of that narrative, steamrolling across America.

And I'm not even saying the cop was justified in his actions. As it stands now, I'm not sure I believe that he was. But holy funkaroni, people are COMPLETELY ignoring the facts of the case as they are currently known and refusing to deviate from their original opinion.

because the police department is bad. Brown was shot because our police departments are bad. Got it?
 
First, he was an angel. Just a small child, whose life was cut short by a bullet to the back while his hands were up.
Then, he was a gentle giant.
Then a video surfaced of him committing a strong-armed robbery, which is a felony.
Then a report came out that he struggled with a cop, the gun went off, and that he might not have been shot in the back.
All of these claims were IMMEDIATELY dismissed.
Then an autopsy report was released in which it was proven he was not shot in the back as was originally claimed.
This does not matter. The facts do not matter. The original claim, that he was an angel who was unjustly shot in the back, is the narrative. No facts will stand in the way of that narrative, steamrolling across America.

And I'm not even saying the cop was justified in his actions. As it stands now, I'm not sure I believe that he was. But holy funkaroni, people are COMPLETELY ignoring the facts of the case as they are currently known and refusing to deviate from their original opinion.

No, not all were dismissed by a long shot. A Youtube video of the autopsy and a simple diagram come out out, and people have made up their minds.
 
His family had this report issued, I think.

No. It was "leaked" by someone in the St. Louis County medical examiner's office. From the article in the OP...

Michael Brown was shot in the head and chest multiple times, according to Mary Case, the St. Louis County medical examiner.

While Case declined to comment further, citing the ongoing investigation into Brown’s death, another person familiar with the county’s investigation told The Washington Post that Brown had between six and eight gunshot wounds and was shot from the front.

In addition, Brown had marijuana in his system when he was shot and killed by a police officer on Aug. 9 in Ferguson, according to this person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation.
 
because the police department is bad. Brown was shot because our police departments are bad. Got it?

Another victim of a culture that values confrontation and violence over discourse and rational human behavior -- a culture that is pushed -- surprise-surprise -- by rich white people on largely undereducated minorities.
 
Usually when tragedies like this happen it is because each person in it made a series of mistakes. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cop acted like a douchebag towards a piece of trash who -unbeknowst to the cop- was worried that he was about to get in trouble for intimidating a productive citizen and robbing a store. This startled douchebag cop, and piece of trash reacted aggressively towards douchebag cop and maybe pushed, shoved, punched, or slammed a police car door. This aggravated douchebag cop, who flew off the handle and in fear for his life as cops tend to be, he fired shots at piece of trash. In a panic, piece of trash ran -possibly towards the cop- and got shot five more times, before dying.

What would be interesting to see is if the forensic teams can piece together the order in which the shots were fired and the location of the cop and victim for each shot. Until that happens, and until the details of what exactly happened within the cop car, I will not cast judgement on the guilt or innocence of the police officer.
 
Another victim of a culture that values confrontation and violence over discourse and rational human behavior -- a culture that is pushed -- surprise-surprise -- by rich white people on largely undereducated minorities.

Spoiled children who have been given material support instead of actual instruction. It's sad.
 
It's hard to tell the difference between wounds caused
A) facing forward, hands down
B) facing away, hands up

Imagine running away from a cop. Behind you is violence, jail, the loss of freedom. Ahead of you is your home, security, family. What would make you stop and turn around? This guy didn't just change his mind and say, "You know what, I'm gonna stop running away from this cop and I'm gonna attack him instead!"

More likely he was running, heard the shots, and turned to surrender. This explains the wound to the palm. A palm is an awkward target for a guy that is bum rushing you.
 
It's hard to tell the difference between wounds caused
A) facing forward, hands down
B) facing away, hands up

Imagine running away from a cop. Behind you is violence, jail, the loss of freedom. Ahead of you is your home, security, family. What would make you stop and turn around? This guy didn't just change his mind and say, "You know what, I'm gonna stop running away from this cop and I'm gonna attack him instead!"

More likely he was running, heard the shots, and turned to surrender. This explains the wound to the palm. A palm is an awkward target for a guy that is bum rushing you.

But we're talking about a 300 pound man. He's not running away from a fit cop.
 
Usually when tragedies like this happen it is because each person in it made a series of mistakes. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cop acted like a douchebag towards a piece of trash who -unbeknowst to the cop- was worried that he was about to get in trouble for intimidating a productive citizen and robbing a store. This startled douchebag cop, and piece of trash reacted aggressively towards douchebag cop and maybe pushed, shoved, punched, or slammed a police car door. This aggravated douchebag cop, who flew off the handle and in fear for his life as cops tend to be, he fired shots at piece of trash. In a panic, piece of trash ran -possibly towards the cop- and got shot five more times, before dying.

What would be interesting to see is if the forensic teams can piece together the order in which the shots were fired and the location of the cop and victim for each shot. Until that happens, and until the details of what exactly happened within the cop car, I will not cast judgement on the guilt or innocence of the police officer.

None of that matters. The standard for lethal force requires that the officer feared for his own life. Brown had no weapon. Unless the officer was physically assaulted at the time of Brown's death, there is no reason for him to draw his pistol. If the cops are to be believed, Wilson would have sustained injuries necessitating deadly force. Show us the pictures. It's that simple.
 
because the police department is bad. Brown was shot because our police departments are bad. Got it?

Police in Ferguson had mistakenly arrested a man before the Michael Brown shooting and, after realizing, proceeded to beat him up in a holding cell and then charge him with destruction of property for bleeding on their uniforms, it has been claimed.
Henry Davis, 52, had missed his turn off for the Missouri city of St. Charles during heavy rain late at night on September 20, 2009, pulling over about 20 miles away in Ferguson.
While waiting for the rain to clear about 3am, a patrol officer ran Davis' plates and arrested him on an outstanding warrant - however it was the wrong Henry Davis.
The wanted man had a different middle name and Social Security number, but Davis, a welder, said the officer cuffed him and put him into a patrol car without explanation, The Daily Beast reported.

'Excessive force': Henry Davis, 52, said in a lawsuit that he was arrested by Ferguson in September 2009 for no reason, severely beaten in lock-up and then charged with 'property damage' for bleeding on the uniforms of four officers
Davis had protested his innocence, and said the cops realized their mistake at Ferguson police station, recalling a booking officer saying: 'We have a problem.'
But Davis was placed in a one-man cell, which already had one man asleep on the only single bed.
Being early morning and cold, he asked for a sleeping mat from a nearby pile, but was refused.
Some time later, Davis said in a lawsuit file thereafter, the booking officer returned to the cell with three other officers.
He said he was slammed against the back wall by one of them and told to lay down with his hands behind his back.
Davis was straddled by a female officer, he said, and cuffed.
Two officers then entered the cell, he said.


'They started hitting me,' Davis later said in court, according to The Daily Beast.
'I was getting hit and I just covered up'
The two left and the female officer returned, holding up Davis' head.
The officer that initially slammed him against the wall returned and kicked him in the head.
'I almost passed out at that point ... Paramedics came,' Davis said.
'They said it was too much blood, I had to go to the hospital.'
Davis was taken to hospital in a police vehicle, however he refused treatment, demanding a witness and photo proof of what had happened.
Afterwards, still under arrest, he was taken back to the police station and held in a cell for several days.
Davis was eventually charged with four counts of property damage - having allegedly bled on the uniforms of four officers - and released on $1,500 bail.

Davis subsequently filed a civil suit, and at least two of the officers involved said in court they did not get blood on their uniforms.
There was no video of the alleged police attack to support Davis' claims of brutality, because the security cameras were VHS at the time and had been recorded at 32 times the normal speed.
A federal magistrate ruled that if the officers had committed perjury about the bloody uniforms, the charges were too minor to press ahead with.
The magistrate also concluded that Davis' injuries were too minor to constitute excessive force.
However a CAT scan taken after the incident confirmed he had suffered a concussion.
The property charges were dropped and the lawsuit was closed.
Davis' lawyer, James Schottel, is currently preparing an appeal, he told The Daily Beast.
Schottel claims that perjury is perjury however minor, and that a concussion is now considered a serious injury.
Schottel also believes that Davis' chances of appealing have now gone up on the back of the Michael Brown outrage and the increasing scrutiny of the police in Ferguson.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-bleeding-THEIR-uniforms.html#ixzz3ApZEw0Xn

Says a great deal about this specific police department's/just us system's mentality when they screw up and their propensity for violence. I wonder if those who see the 18 year old as a thug deserving the fate he received would feel the same if these individuals from the police and justice system were slaughtered there? Or does that fate only apply to certain inner city citizens who aren't shielded by the status that is achieved by agents of the king's government?
 
Back
Top