Corvette Forums moderator cannot STAND to hear the truth...

[Tudo]

Please dont take this attitude.

At the end of the day, that site is looking to generate money. Once you remind them of this fact, the mods back down because they dont want to be responsible for turning away business by their anti-Ron Paul bias. They are charged with being impartial because again, it is a business. If you spend $ on Corvettes and accessories, let it be known that you wont be silenced simply because you support Ron Paul nor should you be.

That we should get as much respect as anyone other Corvette enthusiast.

Make a point of supporting Ron Paul.

It's not an "attitude" it's how I feel. Far as what should and shouldn't happen, what should happen isn't going to happen and that's the way it goes. I expressed my opinion and I realize that your opinion may be "better than my opinion but it's my opinion and lastly I don't go to corvette forums to talk about Ron Paul.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

You haven't been paying attention.

I should clarify. Contradictions have never won an election. You can't just go around telling people whatever they want to hear and expect it to win you an election. If anything, it's only going to turn them off more when they finally found out you were saying something that the man himself doesn't say.

Also, I hate to be the one to tell you, but you are not going to achieve any desirable ends with that strategy. The movement will effectively be dead because of the spread of deception and disinfo, and you would have killed it. Congratulations dude. You can't expect to just tell people what they want to hear and expect them to unify over your cause. It's not going to effect any lasting change. The change it does make will be superficial and temporary.

 

[Victor Grey]

I should clarify. Contradictions have never won an election. You can't just go around telling people whatever they want to hear and expect it to win you an election. If anything, it's only going to turn them off more when they finally found out you were saying something that the man himself doesn't say.

Also, I hate to be the one to tell you, but you are not going to achieve any desirable ends with that strategy. The movement will effectively be dead because of the spread of deception and disinfo, and you would have killed it. Congratulations dude. You can't expect to just tell people what they want to hear and expect them to unify over your cause. It's not going to effect any lasting change. The change it does make will be superficial and temporary.

You haven't been paying attention.

*not an endorsement for lying about your favored candidate's positions.

 

[PaulConventionWV]

You haven't been paying attention.

*not an endorsement for lying about your favored candidate's positions.

Again, I'm talking about THE GRASSROOTS TELLING PEOPLE THINGS THAT THE CANDIDATE HIMSELF IS NOT SAYING!

Jeez, how bad does your reading comprehension have to be?

 

[TruthisTreason]

I've been a member of the corvette forum for years. Although I've never entered political discussions, only mechanical ones on the site.

 

[Victor Grey]

Again, I'm talking about THE GRASSROOTS TELLING PEOPLE THINGS THAT THE CANDIDATE HIMSELF IS NOT SAYING!

Jeez, how bad does your reading comprehension have to be?

Geez I'm sorry, didn't mean to make you butthurt, PaulConventionWV.

Problem?

 

[PaulConventionWV]

Geez I'm sorry, didn't mean to make you butthurt, PaulConventionWV.

Problem?

It's hard to tell if you people are serious or just joking, but you act like you have no reading comprehension, and I don't like having my intelligence insulted by insinuating I don't know what I'm talking about. What I said should be pretty self-evidently true.

 

[driller80545]

I should clarify. Contradictions have never won an election. You can't just go around telling people whatever they want to hear and expect it to win you an election. If anything, it's only going to turn them off more when they finally found out you were saying something that the man himself doesn't say.

Also, I hate to be the one to tell you, but you are not going to achieve any desirable ends with that strategy. The movement will effectively be dead because of the spread of deception and disinfo, and you would have killed it. Congratulations dude. You can't expect to just tell people what they want to hear and expect them to unify over your cause. It's not going to effect any lasting change. The change it does make will be superficial and temporary.

Isn't this what successful politicians do best?

 

[TIMB0B]

I've been posting on forums.corvetteforum.com and one of the moderators there likes to lock my threads when they can't answer my logic regarding liberty. The latest thread was locked after only 1 day...

Seems they didn't like a simple yes/no answer I put to them that none would answer...

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/pol...ersy/3022544-how-many-of-you-republicans.html

Man, you had a chance to hit them with a truth bomb when they brought up Tripoli, but you went with...

Yes, I know about the undeclared "Barbary Wars". Just because the constitution has been ignored when convenient, doesn't mean that it a good idea to do so...

...instead of mentioning a constitutional Letter of Marque and Reprisal was used. Just as Ron Paul requested we use to get Bin Laden & Co.

Article 1 of the United States Constitution lists issuing letters of marque and reprisal in Section 8 as one of the enumerated powers of Congress, alongside the power to tax and to "declare War."

The issue of marque and reprisal was raised before Congress after the September 11 attacks[30] and again on July 21, 2007, by Congressman Ron Paul. The attacks were defined as acts of "air piracy" and the Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001 was introduced, which would have granted the president the authority to use letters of marque and reprisal against the specific terrorists, instead of warring against a foreign state. The terrorists were compared to pirates in that they are difficult to fight by traditional military means.[31] Congressman Paul on April 15, 2009, also advocated the use of letters of marque to address the issue of Somali pirates operating in the Gulf of Aden. However, the bills Congressman Paul introduced were not enacted into law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_marque

This is why we "lose" foreign policy debates. People aren't doing their research. Even RP supporters. I would suggest in the future, consult this board before making a blanket "unconstitutional" rebuttal.