Cop Shoots Dog [VIDEO]

[Nobexliberty]

Just because he is a cop does not mean he does not have the right to defend themself. The owner did not properly restrain his dog and it died because of it. It could have been treated differently but the cops still have the right for self defence.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Just because he is a cop does not mean he does not have the right to defend themself. The owner did not properly restrain his dog and it died because of it. It could have been treated differently but the cops still have the right for self defence.

Unlawful arrest.

 

[Nobexliberty]

Unlawful arrest.

You mean the guy who intentionally made it hard for cops to there job serving society like they are supposed to. I am not a lawyer but the cops are not to blame.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

You mean the guy who intentionally made it hard for cops to there job serving society like they are supposed to. I am not a lawyer but the cops are not to blame.

No, I mean the pigs who intentionally shut down an entire road with at least four squad cars and a MRAP vehicle.

 

[Nobexliberty]

No, I mean the pigs who intentionally shut down an entire road with at least four squad cars and a MRAP vehicle.

Maybe because they have an arrest warrant and need not to be disturbed. It can be for several reasons unless I missed something reading about this incident.

Edit:It was an armed robbery call so they were just doing their job.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

Maybe because they have an arrest warrant and need not to be disturbed. It can be for several reasons unless I missed something reading about this incident.

And he obstructed how? His loud music interrupted the two cops looking around at jack didley shit on the sidewalk? Oh, they say they wouldn't hear their radios if the call for back up was needed... right....

"Need not be disturbed."? Seems to me the only disturbing aspect is a mine resistant vehicle traveling up a city road. Or the fact that an entire road is shut down. Or the fact that a man was arrested (and later released) for filming their tactics.

Need not be disturbed.. that's good. That neighborhood needed not be disturbed! You do realize that there are methods tried and true for hundreds of years of apprehending robbers? For apprehending murderers? You know, before MRAP vehicles and DoD granted APCs.

Unlawful arrest is unlawful.

The dog is furthering the defense against the unlawful arrest therefore the shooting is unlawful. Was that the man charged with a robbery? I think not.

 

[kcchiefs6465]

By the way, I haven't heard.. but did they arrest the robbery suspect at said house they were raiding?


I'd bet not.

 

[Nobexliberty]

And he obstructed how? His loud music interrupted the two cops looking around at jack didley shit on the sidewalk? Oh, they say they wouldn't hear their radios if the call for back up was needed... right....

"Need not be disturbed."? Seems to me the only disturbing aspect is a mine resistant vehicle traveling up a city road. Or the fact that an entire road is shut down. Or the fact that a man was arrested (and later released) for filming their tactics.

Need not be disturbed.. that's good. That neighborhood needed not be disturbed! You do realize that there are methods tried and true for hundreds of years of apprehending robbers? For apprehending murderers? You know, before MRAP vehicles and DoD granted APCs.

Unlawful arrest is unlawful.

The dog is furthering the defense against the unlawful arrest therefore the shooting is unlawful. Was that the man charged with a robbery? I think not.

It was not unlawful, it is a public road and authorities have the right to close them down if they need it. The cops were simply doing their job catching suspects and the dog owner interrupted it, they stopped him and his dog attacked. The cop simply defended himself.

By the way, I haven't heard.. but did they arrest the robbery suspect at said house they were raiding?


I'd bet not.

They barricaded so the suspect so he was probably caught unless he is bullet proof then there is no reason why he should have gotten away.

 

[chudrockz]

Just because he is a cop does not mean he does not have the right to defend themself. The owner did not properly restrain his dog and it died because of it. It could have been treated differently but the cops still have the right for self defence.

Did you actually WATCH the video? That cop was NOT defending himself, he was murdering a dog. Unless of course you think that (for instance) that Cho maniac at Virginia Tech was just defending himself as well.

 

[Nobexliberty]

Did you actually WATCH the video? That cop was NOT defending himself, he was murdering a dog. Unless of course you think that (for instance) that Cho maniac at Virginia Tech was just defending himself as well.

I watched the video and the cop was defending himself.

 

[chudrockz]

I watched the video and the cop was defending himself.

Then if that is what you believe we can agree to disagree, and I remind anyone reading that ANYONE who likewise "defends themselves" against my dog will rue the day they do so.

 

[noneedtoaggress]

Another interview with the owner:



And a facebook post by an officer at the department calling for the dog owner to be prosecuted for it's death:

From:

http://www.secretsofthefed.com/cali-cop-blames-dead-dog-on-owner-in-strange-facebook-rant/

 

[chudrockz]

lkAnd there you have it. WATCH the news report in post #92. At about 1:45 the reporter says "Hawthorne police wouldn't talk on camera. They say they are truly sensitive to the loss of the dog, but officers feared that Max would bite them"

So by that logic, if I walk down the street shooting every cop I see, I have a valid defense. "I'm sorry I shot every cop I encountered, but I feared the officers might shoot me."

 

[Nobexliberty]

lkAnd there you have it. WATCH the news report in post #92. At about 1:45 the reporter says "Hawthorne police wouldn't talk on camera. They say they are truly sensitive to the loss of the dog, but officers feared that Max would bite them"

So by that logic, if I walk down the street shooting every cop I see, I have a valid defense. "I'm sorry I shot every cop I encountered, but I feared the officers might shoot me."

There is a big difference.

 

[juleswin]

Just because he is a cop does not mean he does not have the right to defend themself. The owner did not properly restrain his dog and it died because of it. It could have been treated differently but the cops still have the right for self defence.

Defending himself? if he did not unlawfully arrest Leon, he wouldn't have needed to defend himself. Ever think maybe the dog was trying to defend his owner? If that is how it works then I can walk up to my enemy, punch him in the face and when he trying to defend himself, I can shoot him claiming self defense.

This is not how it works.

 

[NorthCarolinaLiberty]

There are some real pussies on this site. That dog was not only mild by dog standards, the pig actually reaches for the dog. His punishment needs to be the broomstick treatment. 100 pumps up his ass. No lubricant. LOL!

 

[Matthew5]

Yikes, that grammar. I'm guessing officer Vasquez didn't graduate top ten in his class.

 

[Czolgosz]

... if he did not unlawfully arrest Leon, he wouldn't have needed to defend himself.
...

The only sentence needed, this effectively ends any discussion regarding the matter.

 

[AFPVet]

It's almost freaking SOP for these new guys to shoot dogs instead of using less lethal or 'smart' ways of dealing with them. Instead of shocking granny or pepper spraying a little kid for non compliance, how about you use those tools on 'aggressive dogs'? Or better yet, have some dog treats like the postman. Instead of shooting a dog without hesitation or remorse, use better judgment.

Perhaps we should look at the personality types they are hiring for law enforcement nowadays.... Follows orders without question, lacks empathy, has below average intelligence....

 

[nobody's_hero]

Yeah the officer approached it with his arm out trying to make contact with it, what did he think was going to happen.

This was completely unnecessary and could easily have been averted. I don't know what they're arresting the guy for, but from what I gathered so far, it appears to be filming them and making commentary and they're trying to get him on some sort of "obstruction" charge. Look at how co-operative the guy is and how they handle him when putting him in cuffs.

This could have easily been avoided in a multitude of ways if the police were in any way competent. I wouldn't be surprised if they weren't trying to teach this mundane a lesson about messing with them.

The guy was filming cops with a camera, a crime punishable by death of pet and arrest.