Cop Shoots Dog [VIDEO]

Hell, when you show up to a place with a bunch of cops with a camera AND a dog, the LEAST you can expect is for the dog to get shot.

On another note, though, I think the guy has a pretty poor case for his lawsuit. Just the fact that he uttered "civil rights violation" before calmly walking up to them and willingly being placed under arrest screams profit motive. Who else calmly walks toward police who are half a block away when they could speed away in their car rather than face arrest? I don't believe the arrest was lawful, just that he made a poor decision and his lawsuit will probably fail.
 
That is just stupid. I can't believe the lengths people will go to to avenge a fucking dog. Oh, now I'm going to get dumped on for using the word "fucking" in the same sentence as "dog". Seriously, grow up and don't compromise your principles because of a dog. That's just idiotic.

I value my dogs lives over those of nameless agents of the state.

Come visit, fuck with my dogs, find out. :mad:


[edit]

Kops own the cities.

Men own the country.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, yeah, nice poem. Whatever. It's still just a dog. Yes, I said it. It's just a dog. Doessn't make it right, but you don't have to become a vicious killer because your pet dies.

Hell, when you show up to a place with a bunch of cops with a camera AND a dog, the LEAST you can expect is for the dog to get shot.

On another note, though, I think the guy has a pretty poor case for his lawsuit. Just the fact that he uttered "civil rights violation" before calmly walking up to them and willingly being placed under arrest screams profit motive. Who else calmly walks toward police who are half a block away when they could speed away in their car rather than face arrest? I don't believe the arrest was lawful, just that he made a poor decision and his lawsuit will probably fail.

Pretty much the same thing I was thinking except that I think he has a good case for a lawsuit despite it. The state will have to settle since you do not want a jury seeing that video.
 
Last edited:
I value my dogs lives over those of nameless agents of the state.

Come visit, fuck with my dogs, find out. :mad:


[edit]

Kops own the cities.

Men own the country.

Sure, maybe I would, too, but it wouldn't send me into a murderous rage. Talking to fervent dog-worshippers is kind of like talking to the 3rd grade boys who think guns are the solutions to all of life's problems. They can be overheard discussing the variety of situations in which they would pull out a certain kind of gun and make it all better in a blaze of glory.

That said, I don't think anyone here would actually "make headlines" (in a murderous rampage kind of way) over a dead dog. At least, I hope not. They're just talking shit because, like the gun-obsessed 3rd grade boys, they just think it's cool to talk like that.
 
Pretty much the same thing I was thinking except that I think he has a good case for a lawsuit despite it. The state will have to settle since you do not want a jury seeing that video.

You may have a point. It's incredibly easy to settle these days. His case is actually very poor, though, considering all the blinking neon signs that point to his obvious profit motive for doing what he did.
 
Has nothing to do with third-grade anything.

Men tend to live on their own property and protect what is theirs.

A smart man would never take a dog in his care into an environment such as depicted in the video.

This man wouldn't take an animal into the city let alone a family member.

People who make the conscious decision to be subjugated by living right on top of each other only have two choices;

Rebel against the ruling faction.

Become submissive.

I will not submit and I have no doubt the rulers in the city won't either....

Not a good fit.
 
Yeah, yeah, nice poem. Whatever. It's still just a dog. Yes, I said it. It's just a dog. Doessn't make it right, but you don't have to become a vicious killer because your pet dies.

I don't condone violence, but some of us consider our dogs part of the family. If my brother was executed by a pig, would you say I was in the wrong if I went to get some frontier justice?

Like I said, I don't condone justice but there are two classes of people I never shed a tear over when I hear about them getting murdered: pigs and politicians. The way I look at it is they most likely had it coming and it was overdue.
 
I don't condone violence, but some of us consider our dogs part of the family. If my brother was executed by a pig, would you say I was in the wrong if I went to get some frontier justice?

Like I said, I don't condone justice but there are two classes of people I never shed a tear over when I hear about them getting murdered: pigs and politicians. The way I look at it is they most likely had it coming and it was overdue.

The problem lies in understanding that your dog and your brother are two completely different things.
 
Has nothing to do with third-grade anything.

Men tend to live on their own property and protect what is theirs.

A smart man would never take a dog in his care into an environment such as depicted in the video.

This man wouldn't take an animal into the city let alone a family member.

People who make the conscious decision to be subjugated by living right on top of each other only have two choices;

Rebel against the ruling faction.

Become submissive.

I will not submit and I have no doubt the rulers in the city won't either....

Not a good fit.

Not sure what the point of that ramble was.
 
The owner of the dog:



Seems like the officer who shot the dog (Salmon) was also involved in this:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/02/prweb1946004.htm

Hawthorne Police Department Pays $1,000,000 To Settle Police Brutality & Corruption Lawsuit

The Hawthorne Police Department paid One Million Dollars to a Settle Lawsuit in which it was alleged a man was kicked in the face while handcuffed and then falsely prosecuted along with his wife to cover up the brutality. Evidence the plaintiffs were prepared to present at trial included a photograph of an officer appearing to kick the handcuffed plaintiff in the face and a surveillance video allegedly depicting officers high-fiving each other as the injured plaintiff suffered from a broken jaw.
__________________________________________

The Hawthorne Police Department paid One Million Dollars to a Settle Lawsuit in which it was alleged a man was kicked in the face while handcuffed and then falsely prosecuted along with his wife to cover up the brutality. Evidence the plaintiffs were prepared to present at trial included a photograph of an officer appearing to kick the handcuffed plaintiff in the face and a surveillance video allegedly depicting officers high-fiving each other as the injured plaintiff suffered from a broken jaw.

After approval by the City Council, Hawthorne paid $1,000,000, (one million dollars) to settle Goodrow v. Hawthorne Police Department, Case No. CV- 07-5253 (VBV), on the eve of trial in United States District Court, Central District of California, the Honorable Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank presiding.

Officers Ian Elliot, Thomas Heffner, Melanie Newenham, Renee Descant, Jeffrey Salmon, David Gregor and Jailer Darnell Wallace were among defendants named in the lawsuit. The plaintiffs Anthony Goodrow and Karla Henriquez Goodrow sued the Hawthorne Police Officers for alleged deprivation of their civil rights resulting from excessive force, denial of medical treatment and malicious prosecution, stemming from an incident that occurred at a party on July 21, 2006.

On July 21, 2006, the Hawthorne Police Department received a loud noise complaint. Plaintiffs contend that in shutting down the party, officers beat plaintiff Anthony Goodrow, handcuffed him and then continued to beat him. It was further alleged that while Mr. Goodrow was handcuffed and face down on the cement, an Officer kicked Mr. Goodrow in the face breaking his jaw. Mr. Goodrow alleged he was arrested and taken to the jail instead of the hospital causing a delay in medical treatment. The wife of Mr. Goodrow, Karla Henriquez Goodrow, alleged she witnessed part of the beating and screamed for officers to stop. She alleged they arrested her and falsely charged her with public intoxication.

The Goodrows were then prosecuted in criminal court. Ultimately the criminal charges against Mr. Goodrow were dismissed. The case against Mrs. Goodrow proceeded to trial and she was acquitted. After the acquittal the Goodrows filed a federal lawsuit against the officers for deprivation of civil rights, excessive force, malicious prosecution and denial of medical treatment.

Attorney's Glen Jonas and Christopher Driscoll (from the law firm of Jonas & Driscoll L.L.P.) litigated the civil action to its successful conclusion. Todd Melnik was the attorney who successfully defended the plaintiffs in the original criminal matters, enabling the firm of Jonas & Driscoll to litigate the civil rights action against the defendant police officers.

In April 2008, the law firm of Jonas & Driscoll L.L.P. attained a $4.5 million dollar jury verdict against Bell Gardens Police Officers. In July 2009, Jonas & Driscoll L.L.P. will bring to trial L.A. County Sheriff's Deputies accused of viciously beating Deon Dirks.

If you need further information, contact Glen Jonas at 213-683-2033.
 
PR statements:

Hawthorne-police-press-release.jpg


Hawthorne-police-press-release2.jpg


& a new video angle:

 
The problem lies in understanding that your dog and your brother are two completely different things.

They might be two different things to you as a dispassionate observer, but not necessarily to someone who is emotionally bound to the dog.

I assume by your answer that you would not necessarily condemn someone for taking revenge for a sibling? If so, then it is just a matter of degrees because the avenging of a sibling is an emotional response to injustice just like the revenge for a dog.
 
Armed police vs leashed dog
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/07/armed-police-vs-leashed-dog.html

I'd like to see a law that requires the execution of police officers who shoot dogs, but I'd settle for their immediate dismissal from the force and being banned from owning dogs for life. The dog was on a leash, for crying out loud, and his owner was right there. They had a plethora of options available to them, and yet they preferred the one that permit them to live out their violent fantasies. To kill a loyal beast who was only doing his best to protect his master is unconscionable, and yet that has become standard police policy when invading a home.

Throughout history, the state police have always been among the primary instruments of evil, and in the present USA, the corrupt Badge Gang have thoroughly embraced evil in their own right. Their observable enthusiasm for slaughtering innocent animals and children in the pursuit of their "duty" only underlines how sick and depraved they are.

And spare me the "few bad apples" nonsense. If you're wearing a badge these days, you are part of the problem. Ask yourself this: when you and your "brothers" distinguish yourself from "civilians", with whom do you believe you are at war?

no-officer-killed-by-dogs.png


Labels: NWA was right
 
Those cops look like they have Down Syndrome, particularly the one on the left. They sure aren't hiring the "best and brightest" and that's intentional.
 
Yeah, yeah, nice poem. Whatever. It's still just a dog. Yes, I said it. It's just a dog. Doessn't make it right, but you don't have to become a vicious killer because your pet dies.

It's not a pet dying that would cause that reaction (in me, at least). My dog being MURDERED? Yeah, you fuckin' BET.

My dog is NOT just a dog.
 
Okay. NOW I made the ultimate mistake of watching the video. The cop that squeezed the trigger is a fucking BASTARD for whom death is too good. FUCK. :(
 
Back
Top