Cop saves dog

Is this supposed to excuse the dogs that are executed by police?



And when you thought it couldn't get any worse...

 
Last edited:
People, to include the media, often focus on the negative, even when many positive things are happening all around them.

Perhaps this is because it is easier to vilify others, and/or create a news headline ?
 
The argument that "we only focus on the bad and not the good" falls to pieces when you consider that bad cops are not held accountable for their criminal actions.

If you want to hold up good cops as being the standard of the day, send the bad cops who kill or beat innocent people, steal from people, plant evidence, shoot harmless animals, etc... send those people to jail, then I'll talk
 
People, to include the media, often focus on the negative, even when many positive things are happening all around them.

Perhaps this is because it is easier to vilify others, and/or create a news headline ?

The argument that "we only focus on the bad and not the good" falls to pieces when you consider that bad cops are not held accountable for their criminal actions.

If you want to hold up good cops as being the standard of the day, send the bad cops who kill or beat innocent people, steal from people, plant evidence, shoot harmless animals, etc... send those people to jail, then I'll talk
Reading comprehension ?

But yea, around here, as it relates to cops, you seem to be correct ... "only focus on the bad".

This thread is just another testament to a biased mentality.

Most everything is seen in the negative ... Ron Paul being one of few exceptions ;)
 


Great ending :D



That's funny. Notice how the dog was wagging his tail the whole time, even when caught in the fence.

If you want to hold up good cops as being the standard of the day, send the bad cops who kill or beat innocent people, steal from people, plant evidence, shoot harmless animals, etc... send those people to jail, then I'll talk


Yep. Although this sounded like a country cop who was probably a part of the community. This doesn't excuse any bad cops whatsoever.
 
Reading comprehension ?

But yea, around here, as it relates to cops, you seem to be correct ... "only focus on the bad".

This thread is just another testament to a biased mentality.

Most everything is seen in the negative ... Ron Paul being one of few exceptions ;)

Never mind the fact that you always seem to dodge the point of bad cops never being held accountable, you want to know why there are more stories about bad cops than good cops? It's not because the media prefers 'bad cop' stories... they actually love 'good cop' stories, there are just so few good cops.

But again, all of that is irrelevant. You're still clinging onto this "bad apple" way of thinking. If it were an issue of just a few bad apples, the bad apples would be fired or at least disciplined for their criminal actions. However, these bad cops are more likely to get a pat on the back than a slap on the wrist.

When bad cops are not held accountable for their crimes, this is not indicative of a few bad apples, but rather a failed institution.
 
Never mind the fact that you always seem to dodge the point of bad cops never being held accountable, you want to know why there are more stories about bad cops than good cops? It's not because the media prefers 'bad cop' stories... they actually love 'good cop' stories, there are just so few good cops.

But again, all of that is irrelevant. You're still clinging onto this "bad apple" way of thinking. If it were an issue of just a few bad apples, the bad apples would be fired or at least disciplined for their criminal actions. However, these bad cops are more likely to get a pat on the back than a slap on the wrist.

When bad cops are not held accountable for their crimes, this is not indicative of a few bad apples, but rather a failed institution.
And there in lies the rub ... I have said bad cops should be held accountable.
I just don't rush to judgement under the premise that most/all of them are bad, and therefore they should all be found guilty before the evidence is known.

I also don't shout the mantra of never call the cops ;)

I'm glad the lady in the video wasn't afraid to call the cops !!
Aren't you ?
 
Reading comprehension ?

But yea, around here, as it relates to cops, you seem to be correct ... "only focus on the bad".

This thread is just another testament to a biased mentality.

Most everything is seen in the negative ... Ron Paul being one of few exceptions ;)

Well if you want to counteract what you feel is negative bias towards police, the way to do that is to post positive threads like this one, instead of engaging in threads where the police behavior is clearly egregious and trying to excuse it by saying "Oh those people brought it on themselves". I'm glad the officer in the OP actually followed the "protect and serve" motto that used to be on police cars and may still be on some.

Ultimately there are some things we expect people in certain professions to do and not do. We except the priest - pastor - youth leader - juvenile detention officer ect not to molest the children under their authority. When that happens, and people are upset, that doesn't take away from the countless others in those positions that do not abuse their authority. When someone is understandably angry over abuse of authority, saying "Well there are good fill-in-the-blanks" isn't helpful. I'm not sure what would possess someone to shoot a dotson for barking, or try to "help" rescue a chiwawa mix, and then shoot it because you were careless and it bit you, but that's a person not worthy of the authority granted him. (And that's just people who abuse animals. People who abuse people are a whole other category).

Anyway, good thread. I'll try not to derail it further.
 
And there in lies the rub ... I have said bad cops should be held accountable.
I just don't rush to judgement under the premise that most/all of them are bad, and therefore they should all be found guilty before the evidence is known.

I also don't shout the mantra of never call the cops ;)

I'm glad the lady in the video wasn't afraid to call the cops !!
Aren't you ?

That one ended well. The chiwawa that got out and was on the porch didn't end so well. In that situation I'd rather call someone who had gloves and no gun.
 
And there in lies the rub ... I have said bad cops should be held accountable.
I just don't rush to judgement under the premise that most/all of them are bad, and therefore they should all be found guilty before the evidence is known.

I also don't shout the mantra of never call the cops ;)

I'm glad the lady in the video wasn't afraid to call the cops !!
Aren't you ?

On the one side, you know bad cops aren't held accountable (though I've never seen you voice an opinion of this kind), and on the other, you believe the institution is not flawed and is mostly good?

It can't be both. Which is it?
 
Never mind the fact that you always seem to dodge the point of bad cops never being held accountable, you want to know why there are more stories about bad cops than good cops? It's not because the media prefers 'bad cop' stories... they actually love 'good cop' stories, there are just so few good cops.
Bullshit. Just like AF says... it's not news when a cop is just doing his job. Every day there are good cops out there doing their job; likewise, every day there are bad cops who should be fired or convicted. That is why an organization like Oath Keepers is so important.

But again, all of that is irrelevant. You're still clinging onto this "bad apple" way of thinking. If it were an issue of just a few bad apples, the bad apples would be fired or at least disciplined for their criminal actions. However, these bad cops are more likely to get a pat on the back than a slap on the wrist.

When bad cops are not held accountable for their crimes, this is not indicative of a few bad apples, but rather a failed institution.
I realize it is more than "just a few bad apples" just like I realize the stupidity of "all cops are bad". Hence the need for organizations like Oath Keepers.
 
Last edited:
Bullshit. Just like AF says... it's not news when a cop is just doing his job. Every day there are good cops out there doing there job; likewise, every day there are bad cops who should be fired or convicted. That is why an organization like Oath Keepers is so important.

Every day there are hundreds of "bad cop" events that go unreported in the news. This is because it's simply not interesting. Whether it's a good cop story, or a bad cop story, if it's not interesting, it's not reported. Whether the cop is good or bad actually has very little to do with it.

I realize it is more that "just a few bad apples" just like I realize the stupidity of "all cops are bad". Hence the need for organizations like Oath Keepers.

In the eyes of the PD, there is no such thing as a "bad cop." The bad cops that do get fired due to public outrage, their fellow cops feel that cop got "screwed by the system." The only bad cop in the eyes of the PD, are the good cops in the eyes of us.

So if there is no such thing as a bad cop, how can there be such thing as a good cop?
 
Back
Top