LibertyEagle
Paleoconservative
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 52,730
Here's the thing. When you make claims about people/organizations, unless you back up your assertions with some pretty darn good facts, people are likely to take issue. Especially when you ding an organization, the JBS, which Dr. Paul has spoken highly of for decades.I presented evidence that supported the fact that JBS & Griffin are knowingly misleading their followers through containment (ie. not presenting all the information that they have available in order to maintain a given construct of reality). I referred to social research & academic institutions that created techniques commonly used in disinformation. Not one person in this thread appears to have read these references, and not one person has asked a relevant objective followup question about the techniques utilized.
Instead, what I saw was you making a lot of claims, but when people asked you for specifics, instead of giving them, you suggested to them that they couldn't understand unless they figured it out themselves. The few things that you did offer seemed rather non substantive.
Who knows, you could be right, but if so, you're probably going to have to offer more hard evidence for most to believe it.
What I have received is as mentioned in previous posts: outright dismissal; thread usurpation; refusal to research any of the material presented; and finally threats that were ignored by moderators.
If you perceive a threat, use the flag feature

Last edited: