Anything the federal government does is gonna be "central planning" by definition.
If you're against having a federal government at all, then great, just say that.
If you're not against have a federal government, then by definition, you're for some amount of central planning, which is fine too, but you don't really get to say it's not central planning because it is.
But the whole idea of being for or against "central planning", as a separate concept from government itself, is just stupid. It's a redundant term with ambiguous meaning, as demonstrated in this thread.