Congressmen with 70% or better RP rating. Who lost, who won?

[klamath]

These are congressmen nationwide that voted 70% or better with RP (RP gets a 100% in this scorecard) How did they fair?. If you have any info please post it here. I could look them all up but I do have to work sometimes.

I will highlight the names in red if they won and blue if they lost.

Franks AZ
Shadegg AZ
Flake AZ

Royce CA
Rohrabacher CACampbell CA
Hunter CA

Larnborn CO

Miller FL
Stearns FL
Mica FL
Weldon FL
Feeney FL

Westmoreland GA
Price GA
Linder GA
Deal GA
Broun GA
Gingrey GA

Sali ID

Burton IN

Scalise LA

Bachmann MN

Akin MO

Garrett NJ

Jordan OH

Barrett SC

Duncan TN

Poe TX
Johnson TX
Culberson TX
Paul TX
Burgess TX
Sessions TX

Bishop UT

Good VA
Cantor VA

McMorris Rodgers WA

Sensenbrenner WI

Cubin WY

By the way there is not one democrat on this list.

 

[klamath]

bump

 

[tmosley]

Of course Paul won.

 

[klamath]

Of course Paul won.

I forgot I put Paul on the list:o:o:o

 

[fr33domfightr]

Cambell CA

You mean, Campbell, right? He voted for the bailout!



FF

 

[wreed]

Don't go looking in Alabama for any, I don't think there are any. But Aderholt and Rogers won their seats, Bachus and Davis kept there and a Democrat won the open seat.

 

[klamath]

Cambell CA

You mean, Campbell, right? He voted for the bailout!



FF

Thanks for the catch on the typo.

He may have voted for the bailout but his overall record is better than 70%. Obvious the bailout wasn't a big factor as a hell of a lot more Democrats voted for it than repuplicans and it was a big night for them! I am glad that the voters of Campbell's district didn't punish a 70% man and replace him with a 20% guy.

 

[CUnknown]

Can you indicate with a * those who voted against the bailout and those who voted at least 80% or 85% of the time with Ron Paul? I'm not sure 70% is a good enough benchmark.

 

[fr33domfightr]

Thanks for the catch on the typo.

He may have voted for the bailout but his overall record is better than 70%. Obvious the bailout wasn't a big factor as a hell of a lot more Democrats voted for it than repuplicans and it was a big night for them! I am glad that the voters of Campbell's district didn't punish a 70% man and replace him with a 20% guy.

Our meetups were trying to get rid of him. Better to have the Libertarian, than him. Even the CFL created slim jims with his name on it, railing against the bailout.


FF

 

[Printo]

IM not too sure of Steve Chabot (Ohio's 1st aka Cincinnati) record compared to Paul, but he lost a squeaker against Democrat Steve Driehaus. I know for one that Chabot did vote against the bail out both times.

 

[Enano1983]

Robert Bishop (UT) won at 65%
http://www.electionresults.utah.gov/xmlData/30010.html

 

[klamath]

Can you indicate with a * those who voted against the bailout and those who voted at least 80% or 85% of the time with Ron Paul? I'm not sure 70% is a good enough benchmark.

Unfortunately I believe there is only one congressman that gets above 80% besides Paul and that is Duncan from tn.
Here is the link to the report card.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/files/Freedom_Index_110-4.pdf

 

[klamath]

Robert Bishop (UT) won at 65%
http://www.electionresults.utah.gov/xmlData/30010.html

Thanks. Put him in red.

 

[Dorfsmith]

Shadegg
Franks
Flake

All re-elected in AZ.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/tempe/articles/2008/11/04/20081104elect-azcongress-online.html

 

[klamath]

Shadegg
Franks
Flake

All re-elected in AZ.

http://www.azcentral.com/community/tempe/articles/2008/11/04/20081104elect-azcongress-online.html

Thanks.

 

[ShannonOBrien]

This is difficult because some issues are more important than others. For example, someone might vote with Ron Paul 70% of the time but have voted for the bailout, patriot act and Iraq war. Maybe it would be better to have weighted the issues.

 

[klamath]

This is difficult because some issues are more important than others. For example, someone might vote with Ron Paul 70% of the time but have voted for the bailout, patriot act and Iraq war. Maybe it would be better to have weighted the issues.

That is very true but the trouble is every single person puts a different weight on each issue. The is the best we can objectively do. For an example you might consider a vote on drug use holds more weight that 50 votes for good fiscal policy or antiwar votes but I might not.

 

[Shotdown1027]

Rohrabacher won (for all you anarcho-capitalists, this man used to be one of you)

Tancredo's retiring.

 

[Shotdown1027]

Also, Scalise, Duncan, and Goode all won (though Goode is barely ahead,there may be a recount).

 

[Shotdown1027]

You know what? I'll look 'em all up later, I wanna know.