Confused, abused and misused transgenders

Occam's Banana said:
The cult of gender ideology is finally disintegrating
Recent findings reveal that Susie Green had influence over policy at the Tavistock clinic – a woman who should never have had any authority
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/columnists/2023/05/30/the-cult-of-gender-ideology-finally-crumbling/
Suzanne Moore (30 May 2023)

Susie Green, the former chief executive of Mermaids, who stood down “unexpectedly” last year, has been hiding in plain sight for so long that I sincerely hope we can see her clearly now. How this woman was ever allowed to have so much influence over vulnerable children, never mind medical professionals, is frankly disturbing. She is a former IT consultant with no medical training – unless you count the fact that she won 2016’s Sparkle Diversity Champion of the Year as a specialised qualification. I certainly don’t. The story of how much power she came to have remains shocking.

The organisation she ran was once not controversial; it was a support group for children and parents of kids with gender issues until she got her hands on it. It became an activist and lobby group receiving hundreds of thousands of pounds in lottery funding and grants and was hired by the Department for Education to provide training on “gender identity” in schools. As with Stonewall, it had huge reach into key institutions and the usual gormless celebrity support.

We now find that Green herself had direct influence on policy at the gender identity development service (GIDS) at the Tavistock. After being told that the Tavistock did not have any records of meeting with Green, when threatened by court action, miraculously it found 300 pages of them.

They reveal that Green spoke directly to the director Dr Polly Carmichael, had advisory roles on two studies and – most scandalous of all – could refer children for treatment at the clinic even when their own GPs had repeatedly advised against it. The Cass Review, remember, effectively shut down GIDS as it was not fit for purpose.

GIDS was in turmoil and dealing with a new cohort of distressed young women with gender dysphoria; the number of girls jumped 5,000 per cent in a seven-year period. Cass found there were no long-term follow-ups even though nearly every child who was referred for prescribed puberty blockers went on to cross-sex hormones [which are used to transition from biological gender to desired gender].

Puberty blockers are controversial because we don’t have enough longitudinal studies to really understand their impact, which is why several countries such as Sweden and Norway have stopped them. The NHS site says they are not simply reversible. Research is showing that when distressed teenagers are given therapy, they no longer want to change gender and many accept they are gay. Puberty blockers tend to be the first step on a medical pathway that leads to cross-sex hormones and surgery. The other issue which Green should know well, is that if given too early, genitalia do not develop enough to make satisfactory “new models”. These kids may well lose their fertility and any chance of sexual pleasure.

There is an infamous Ted Talk and other YouTube videos of Green talking of what happened to her own son. He wanted a Barbie Rapunzel and other girl things. Her husband, she claims, didn’t like this “girly” boy. Later, he was whizzed off to the States at age 12 for puberty blockers and at 14 was out on oestrogen. He spent seven hours on his 16th birthday on an operating table in Thailand in what is euphemistically called “gender-affirming” surgery.

Green explains this meant “basically use[ing] the skin from the penis to create a vagina. And she hadn’t developed through full puberty so, not to put too fine a point on it, there wasn’t much to work with”. That is the work of puberty blockers.

This operation was done in Thailand as it is illegal to do that to a 16-year-old here. Indeed, it is now illegal in Thailand. If this well-known information is not a red flag, I don’t know what is. Yet this woman was, we now know, given carte blanche to overrule psychiatrists and medics and to push her dubious agenda. What is that agenda? It is the lucrative invention of the trans child. I say lucrative, because in the States, billions of dollars are projected to be made by surgeons and drug companies with lifelong medicalisation being offered to 13-year-olds who have been diagnosed sometimes as young as four.

Green herself has now chummed up with Dr Helen Webberley of GenderGP, who was once suspended, and who sells cross-sex hormones to under-16s, which is not allowed in the UK. This is done online with no counselling.

None of this is really about the trans rights of adults. It is about the pushing of extreme gender ideology on to distressed children. Any basic model of safeguarding has gone out of the window. It is a complete negation of the duty to ‘Do No Harm’ and at its centre is a woman who should never, ever have been given any authority.

I really hope that for Susie Green, the game is finally up.
Click to expand...

//
 
The elite want to get rid of the regular people. They are working the demoralization angle to the hilt. Between gender affirming care , vax, war, poison foods and water they may just get what they want. The good news is the strong will survive.
 
IMG_1957.jpeg
 
So, I need to be clear. I don't approve of hate towards transgenders or derogatory names like "trannys." And your post about the transgender stabbing his/her father doesn't belong in this thread. It belongs in [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION]'s thread on "violent transgenders" and I think he already posted this story there. (And I don't think AF is coming from a position of hate either). Have you ever heard the statement "But for the grace of God go I?" Well that applies here. I know transgenders personally and I know the childhood trauma they went through. I went through similar childhood trauma and while I didn't choose the transgender path, there is not a month (week?) that goes by that suicide doesn't cross my mind. So, please understand me when I say that I most vehemently disagree with your request and I request you keep the right posts in the right threads.

unknown said:
[MENTION=849]jmdrake[/MENTION]

Would you mind changing the thread title, replace "transgender" with "trannys" ?

I mean, assuming that doesnt violate forum rules.
Click to expand...

unknown said:
https://twitter.com/ReduxxMag/status/1669137185759703042

Click to expand...
 
I wouldnt say that I hate trannys, that was just a common term, tranny, cross dresser, I think queen was another, per years of listening to Howard Stern.

But I would say that I am resentful of the agenda, what I see as an effort to force acceptance, prevent criticism, and in the case of children, promotion and adoption.

I think youre right about the thread, the other one would have been more appropriate.
 
Last edited:
Bold emphasis added:
Occam's Banana said:
Second Lawsuit Filed in US Against Medical Transition of Minors
Layla Jane accuses the defendants of “gross negligence” that led to permanent disfigurement.
https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/breaking-second-lawsuit-filed-in
Christina Buttons (14 June 2023)

[...]

According to the lawsuit, Lovdahl exhibited various mental health symptoms during her childhood, which went largely unaddressed despite her parents’ concerns and a family history of mental health problems. At 11, Lovdahl identified as transgender and socially transitioned to living as a boy. However, the lawsuit alleges that the defendants failed to sufficiently evaluate or treat her mental health symptoms, and instead affirmed her self-diagnosed transgender identity without thorough evaluation. Lovdahl started hormone treatment and puberty blockers at 12, underwent a double mastectomy at 13, and detransitioned at 17. She then started regular psychotherapy for her mental health issues.

The lawsuit claims the defendants breached the standard of care by rushing Lovdahl into a transition process without proper evaluation of her co-occurring mental health issues. Furthermore, it alleges that they did not provide thorough informed consent by withholding information about the risks and outcomes of the treatment. The lawsuit accuses the defendants of “gross negligence” that led to permanent disfigurement, referring to their practices as experimental rather than genuine care.

The suit cites studies showing high desistance rates of childhood gender dysphoria, suggesting that 80-90% of cases are resolved by adulthood. It also highlights the persistence of psychological distress among transgender individuals who undergo transition treatments, including increased risks of psychiatric disorders and suicide. Also mentioned are the systematic evidence reviews conducted in the U.K. and several other European countries that found the risks associated with puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones outweigh their benefits, and sufficient research on their long-term impact is lacking.

[...]

While the exact number of detransitioners is unknown, and more research is needed, cases appear to be steadily rising. Recent studies have revealed a growing trend where individuals, upon detransitioning, acknowledge that their transgender identity was a temporary coping mechanism for their distress. Approximately three-quarters of detransitioners never inform their initial treating providers about their decision to detransition.

[...]

Watch: Detransitioner Chloe Cole sits down for the first full-length interview with Layla Jane.

The Unseen Side of Early Transition, Mastectomy at 13 Years Old | Layla Jane Fights Back!
I interview my good friend and personal hero Layla Jane. She is actively suing Kaiser Permanente and some of the same doctors that I was harmed by. You can find more information about her lawsuit here: https://libertycenter.org/cases/layla/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZWslwe3W1c

​
Click to expand...


//
 
Last edited:
He doesn't understand it because his f**king brain is broken.

Look, fella... just because you have fake tits and a vivid imagination doesn't mean that you're a broad. Even if you chopped your dick off and had a surgeon slice your taint to make you think you have a p**y, you still wouldn't be a woman, because you wouldn't be a complete pain in the a$$ almost always. You'd just be a dude with fake tits, an unhealead wound between your legs and long hair.

You're just not a woman, dude. And you're never going to be. You have that pesky Y chromosome, and in 10,000 years, when some futuristic archeologist digs your bones up, they're going to say, "hey, I found the bones of a 10,000 year old man." That's it. You weren't born in the wrong body. Your brain is broken. That's it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jmdrake
Biden officials pushed to REMOVE age limits on gender-affirming surgery!
Replies
10
Views
729
WarriorLiberty
W
jmdrake
Mother of Transgender Teen Woke Her out of Deep-Sleep to Insert Lubricated Dilator
Replies
1
Views
276
jmdrake
jmdrake
jmdrake
Lawsuit alleges that man posing as transgender woman raped female prisoner at Rikers
Replies
17
Views
701
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Queeer Surgeon Admits Performing Transsexual Surgeries on Young Children
Replies
18
Views
1K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
WA-State set to pass law that will keep queeer runaway children's names from parents
Replies
2
Views
360
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
Back
Top