Newt Gingrich Comprehensive list of Newt Gingrich positions

Newt's "balanced budgets" drove the National Debt up $1 Trillion

MYTH: “Newt balanced the budget.”
FACT: The National Debt went up nearly $1 Trillion while he was Speaker.

Gingrich was the House Speaker from January 4, 1995 – January 3, 1999.

The National Debt went up every year during that time.

The budget was not as balanced as he is constantly bragging about.


1994 - $4.692 Trillion
1995 - $4.973 Trillion
1996 - $5.224 Trillion
1997 - $5.413 Trillion
1998 - $5.526 Trillion
1999 - $5.656 Trillion

(Source: Treasury Direct.gov)
 
35ifoc.jpg


35rley.jpg


35thrw.jpg


35gxpc.jpg


396031_222305751190124_191340530953313_475208_143752298_n.jpg
 
Gingrich promises strict enforcement of anti-pornography laws

Santorum, Romney and Gingrich vow to enforce anti-porn laws
Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney, and Newt Gingrich have all told the group Morality in Media that they would enforce federal obscenity laws that prohibit the distribution of pornography.

Those laws, the anti-pornography group said, are being ignored by the current administration.

Gingrich also said he would appoint an Attorney General who would enforce federal obscenity laws.

Santorum and Gingrich previously signed a pledge by the conservative Christian group The Family Leader in which they vowed to protect women and children from “seduction into promiscuity and all forms of pornography.”
 
For a better view of Newt's twisted jurisprudence, I encourage people to read his paper titled, Bringing the Courts Back Under the Constitution. Complete disrespect for the Law.
 
MYTH: “Newt balanced the budget.”
FACT: The National Debt went up nearly $1 Trillion while he was Speaker.

Gingrich was the House Speaker from January 4, 1995 – January 3, 1999.

The National Debt went up every year during that time.

The budget was not as balanced as he is constantly bragging about.


1994 - $4.692 Trillion
1995 - $4.973 Trillion
1996 - $5.224 Trillion
1997 - $5.413 Trillion
1998 - $5.526 Trillion
1999 - $5.656 Trillion

(Source: Treasury Direct.gov)

Not to mention, he (and Clinton) defrauded the public by embezzling funds from the social security trust to further this illusion of a "balanced budget."
 
Gingrich co-sponsored 418 bills with Nancy Pelosi in 12 years

While in Congress, Gingrich co-sponsored 418 bills with Pelosi
Gingrich co-sponsored 418 bills in Congress with Pelosi during the 12 years they served together in the House, according to the Library of Congress’s THOMAS database.

Gingrich was in Congress from 1979 to 1999. Pelosi has served since 1987.

As a matter of comparison, House Speaker John Boehner, who has served in Congress with Pelosi for more than 20 years, has only co-sponsored 104 bills with her.

Many of the bills Gingrich and Pelosi co-sponsored were hardly divisive: authorizing an award for Mother Teresa, giving a congressional gold medal to former President Gerald Ford and recognizing the 50th anniversary of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

But one piece of legislation could be problematic for Gingrich with conservatives: the Global Warming Prevention Act of 1989, which never made it out of committee.
 
Newt: Feds should subsidize state & local museums, arts, ballets (1995)

Yes, even Federal funding for the Atlanta ballet.

 
I recently understood that besides the moon, Gingrich also happens to be "wild" about the zoo


Newt-Zoos001.jpg
 
I agree with the vast majority of this, but just want to point out that "Federalist" does have different definitions. It could be the oppose of an anti-federalist, or it could mean support for state's rights, which is sometimes referred to as "Federalism." I'm guessing its the former in Newt's case, but it isn't always.
 
I don't really see any reason to go after him when he's agreeing with us. If he's acting like Christie and attacking us, sure, but at the moment he doesn't seem to. There are some weird tendencies in this movement to attack people when they praise or defend Ron or Rand simply because people perceive them to be disingenuous, yet whenever a liberty politician has any praise for an "enemy of liberty" (like McConnell or Enzi), he receives a strong bashing from certain members and is accused of being a sellout.

What Gingrich did was actually very useful. I know a lot of Republican voters that like and respect Newt Gingrich and any praise that he gives Rand will help Rand in 2016.

Why go after Gingrich at this time, when you can go after Chris Christie, Rick Santorum, Tom Cotton, Peter King and the rest of the Rand haters?
 
Back
Top