Col. Macgregor says US should De-escalate the War not Escalate

"Ukraine is a done deal. It’s flattened and they lost"

It looks like retired Colonel Douglas Macgregor was right a week ago when he told a disbelieving Stuart Varney that Russia would take Ukraine.


Macgregor said, "The first five days, Russian forces I think, frankly, were too gentle. They’ve now corrected that. So I would say another 10 days, this should be completely over. But the question is, what is it that Zelensky is going to do? The Russians have made it very clear what they want is a neutral Ukraine. This could’ve ended days ago if he accepted that. And then they can adjust the borders, but the eastern part of Ukraine is firmly in Russian hands, but again, the Russians are not seizing territory. They’re destroying Ukrainian forces. That’s their focus."

His argument was that Zelensky should cut a deal, agree to keep Ukraine neutral in the NATO-Russia standoff and give up some of the Russian-dominated eastern Ukraine. Macgregor did not see Zelensky as a hero.

Macgregor said, "A neutral Ukraine would be good for us as well as for Russia. It would create the buffer that, frankly, both sides want. But he’s, I think, being told to hang on and try to drag this out, which is tragic for the people that have to live through this."
Liz Cheney showed she was the daughter of a man the left called a chickenhawk by denouncing the colonel.

She tweeted, "Douglas Macgregor, nominated by Trump as ambassador to Germany; appointed by Trump as senior advisor to the Secretary of Defense, says Russian forces have been 'too gentle' and 'I don’t see anything heroic' about Zelensky.

"This is the Putin wing of the GOP."

I guess I was in the Gaddafi wing when I opposed Hillary bombing Libya so she could prove her manhood. She valiantly said on TV 5,000 miles away, "We came. We saw. He's dead."

A few days later, so was her ambassador and three good soldiers because of her refusal to send troops to protect them from those seeking vengeance on the USA.

Libya posed no threat to us. Gaddafi gave up his nuclear ambitions. Heck, he was Hugh Hefner living on Viagra, cocaine and young women.

Putin's push into Ukraine was just as wrong. But please, don't put me in the Zelensky wing because his demand to be added to NATO was stupid and put his country at risk.

It is all a mess as wars usually are. No one is a hero.

Media-ite reported:

Fox News reporter Steve Harrigan returned from Ukraine with a grim message about the future of Ukraine, but also a prediction that the Russian people “are going to rise up” and overthrow Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“I think Putin is being bled. And he will be bled for years and it will take years. Maybe the oligarchs who are making as much money will hurt. Maybe the Russian people will rise up,” said Harrigan on America’s Newsroom on Monday. “I think for me, Ukraine is a done deal. It’s flattened and they lost. But the next story, I think, is Russia. The Russian people are going to rise up and throw this guy out.”

Co-host Julie Banderas, filling in for Dana Perino, asked Harrigan if he forecasts a coup and whether it’s “too late” for that.

“You know what, I think this is a long-term tragedy,” he replied. “We’re watching people get slaughtered. And we’re going to watch it for years to come.”

I don't know about an uprising against Putin. He is Russia's problem, not mine.

And Zelensky is Ukraine's problem, not mine. I have enough on my plate with a dummy in dementia running the show. His backup is Cackling Kamala, who is unable to handle the simplest question without a deer-caught-in-the-headlights moment.

Losing a war does not necessarily cost a leader his job so maybe Putin and Zelensky stay. The latter would be ironic since Zelensky marketed himself as a modern Churchill. Sir Winston won his war and lost his job. The Big Z looks to lose his war and keep his job. Face it, that is his real motivation.

The media has been so hawkish that one could believe World War 3 is handing out free donuts and bagels to reporters to ply their support.

Ukraine has been a cash cow for Washington insiders for decades. I am not sure where Ukraine gets the dough to pay off the spawn of politicians such as Biden and Pelosi. Maybe it is kickbacks from U.S. foreign aid.

Meanwhile, the war has shown globalism for what it is: economic suicide.

Zero Hedge reported, "US Producer Prices Soar At Double-Digits For First Time."

Producer prices, a harbinger of consumer inflation, hit exactly 10% in February.

The prices will get higher because the snots running Western economies decided to boycott Russia and seize the yachts (excuse me, super-yachts as the tabloids call them) of Russian oligarchs.

Now Russia is retaliating. It is a major producer of fertilizers and it is cutting off exports outside of Asia. That will send farm prices soaring. Higher fertilizer costs increase the cost of corn which feeds the pigs that turn into bacon.

And it gets worse.

Zero Hedge reported, "According to Interfax, Russia's Agriculture Ministry said that the country could ban wheat, rye, barley and corn exports from March 15 to June 30.

"'The Agriculture Ministry, together with the Industry and Trade Ministry, has drafted a government resolution that provides for a temporary ban on the export of basic grain crops from Russia from March 15 to June 30 of the current year inclusive,' the ministry's press office told Interfax.

"The exact wording is to impose from March 15 to June 30, 2022 inclusive a temporary ban on the export of wheat and meslin, rye, barley and corn from the Russian Federation, it said."

So, the West shut down McDonald's and Putin shuts off their food.

But in Matt Drudge Land, Putin is about to take a powder.

The Drudge Report highlighted a story in The Sun, which began, "Putin could only have ten days to win the war in Ukraine before his forces buckle, defense experts have claimed.

"The Russian tyrant expected a quick victory when he ordered the invasion on February 23 but his forces have encountered fierce resistance, with 150 Kremlin troops killed overnight in Mariupol."

They never say how many Ukrainians die.

Hamas-shielding AP reported, "Russia’s relentless bombardment of Ukraine edged closer to central Kyiv as a series of strikes hit a residential neighborhood Tuesday, while the leaders of three European Union countries planned a bold visit to Ukraine’s capital and the number of people the war has driven from the country passed 3 million.

"Large explosions thundered across Kyiv before dawn from what Ukrainian authorities said were artillery strikes, as Russia’s assault on the city appeared to become more systematic. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said barrages hit four multi-story buildings in the city and caused dozens of deaths.

"The strikes targeted a western district of Kyiv, disrupting a relative calm that returned after an initial advance by Russian forces was stopped in the early days of the war. Tuesday’s shelling ignited a huge fire in a 15-story apartment building and spurred a frantic rescue effort.

"As Russia stepped up its assault on Kyiv, the leaders of Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovenia set out for Ukraine’s embattled capital by train to show support for the country."

It does not sound as if the Russian forces are buckling. It seems like Putin is leveling Ukraine's capital, just as Macgregor said he would.
https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2022/03/ukraine-is-done-deal-its-flattened-and.html
 
How does one de-escalate?

In this case one must ask what that really means. Putin is not going to quit, so "de-escalation" would seem to be codespeak bullshit for "capitulation". That might be the answer, but if so then speak plainly and use the right words.

If "capitulation" means that the genocide in Donbass is stopped and Donbass is allowed its right to self determination, I don't see any issue with "capitulating".

That all aside, why would you want to de-escalate? That tells Putin that he can get away with it. Putin has explicitly expressed a desire to reclaim lost Soviet territories. That means all of eastern Europe, Georgia, etc. If he gets away with Ukraine, what is the principled reason he would stop there?

Putin has public expressed that these people are still culturally Russian. Meaning that if they want to join him, he would welcome them.

I don't see any issue with that.

NATO has no balls. As I've mentioned elsewhere, they have been hiding behind American nuclear weapons, talking big talk as they rattled in their boots for 70+ years. The trash od western Europe have had the easy life all that time and now shiver at the specter of losing it in yet another mechanized, industrial-scale war. If Putin had it up his butt to take what he wants and had the oats to actually do it, how likely do you think it would be that Europe would adopt the French method of meeting aggression with "we surrender!"? I think it very likely. The doddering, child-sniffing Molester In Chief would do nothing because the only thing tough about him is his embarrassing talk.

Putin sees weakness in the west, and thus far has been proven astute, even if he is a raving psychopath, which he is. Soviet Russia is alive and far too well for my liking.

This Ukraine thing may yet backfire on Putin, but in the end Ukraine will be toast because Vlad-baby will see it razed before he lets NATO have it. I would add that the post-revolution Communist tyrannies have hated the Ukrainians with bitter passion, as demonstrated by Stalin's brutal murder of six+ million Ukrainians in the early 20th century.

I am NOT in favor of intervention, but is inaction really a solution. Putin is a megalomaniacal loon whose limits are no longer assumable. He might stop at Ukraine, but the history of human proclivity in such affairs suggests this is unlikely. Humans and power - terrible combination. We can say "so what if he takes Europe - fukkum." I don't think things are any longer quite so simple. The possibilities there are huge, including clandestine rebuilding of their former nuclear stockpiles including deliver capabilities. I grant that Russian military tech is basically shit, but if they pursue their usual strategy of churning out crap-quality in inhuman quantities, America would then face a threat far worse than the Soviet Onion in 1960. They have never been able to master targeting systems, and it is demonstrated even now in Ukraine. That means they will used huge yields to get the job done - 20+MT warheads. They built the Tsar Bomba, estimated at 52 MT equivalent yield, and that was WITHOUT the third stage installed, which was designed for 100MT, but probably would prove larger. I put nothing past those animals, including arming their missiles with three-stage warheads of ungodly yields. It won't matter if we hit them back - we will be destroyed and those who survive will envy the dead. Those bastards, being subhuman beasts, will certainly execute ground burst protocols, which means vast clouds of fallout. I don't need to repeat the rest.

So really, that prick has painted all us all into a corner, himself included. I would suggest the right course of action is to keep a steady flow of arms into Ukraine for as long as they are willing and able to fight. Their land is likely toast no matter what happens. Boots on the ground could very well trigger a nuclear first strike - certainly against Europe, and perhaps the USA. Doesn't matter - once the bombs begin to drop, life as we all know it stops. Do nothing as we invite more of the same.

Given the stakes, has anyone considered a team willing to go on a suicide mission to assassinate Putin? Almost certain death, but we're looking at that in any event. I'm thinking it is not unlikely that were we to off that scumbag, the rest of the Russian hierarchy might just heave a big sigh of relief nd quietly thank us through back channels. The Russian culture since Lenin was one of snitching out anyone not walking around with a great big boner for the "motherland" and blessèd communism. There is absolutely zero reason to expect that this does not remain the case. I'm sure nobody in their government feels they can trust anyone for fear of being denounced. We do them the favor and who can say - maybe we could actually then cultivate a mutually beneficial partnership in trade and ease tensions between us. Putin is wildly insane IMO and must go.

Of course, we should also mind our own business in peace time, something American politicians seem most unwilling to accept.

And so we see that basically everyone is at fault, including you and myownself, in the ways of our respective failures.

Mors Tyrannis.
Mors Tyrannidem.

You have painted Putin a villain and cannot see beyond that. Or more accurate, western media has painted Putin a villain and you bought it hook line and sinker.

Mors Ignorantia.
 
If "capitulation" means that the genocide in Donbass is stopped and Donbass is allowed its right to self determination, I don't see any issue with "capitulating".

If only it were that simple.

Putin has public expressed that these people are still culturally Russian. Meaning that if they want to join him, he would welcome them.

Well enough. Now look at it from the other side. What if Crimea decided they wanted to be their own independent land? Do you think for a moment that Russia would allow them to secede? The ship of Soviet "collapse" has sailed and will not be returning any time soon. I'd bet money I do not have that Russia would sooner see Crimea razed to the last brick and every soul sent to Jesus before they would cede so much as a grain of sand to Crimean independence, or that of any other subdivision you might care to name.

Remember Chechnya? HMMM...

If Crimea suddenly decided to return to life with Ukraine, would NATO stand within its moral circle to invade for the sake of "liberating" those people? What's good for the goose...

Whatever happened to leaving nation-states to their internal devices, regardless of how ghastly? Has that been formally abandoned? If so, when did that happen? I ask forthrightly because I do not recall it ever having happened. One cannot credibly cry about sovereignty from the one side of their mouths while supporting the violation of sovereignty from the other. You may not like what the Ukrainians are doing to people in Donbass. Perhaps I don't like what is happening in Mexico. Shall we move our tanks into Tijuana on the way to Mexico City?

I'm trying to point out all the bullshit here, not to mention the rank hypocrisy of pretty well everybody involved. Biden is scum. Putin is scum. Zelensky is scum. They are ALL scum, are engaging in acts of deeply felonious natures, and the common people are the ones sucking it. This is boiler plate and what do we do about it? Nothing worthy of mention. Anyone painting Putin and Russia as victims is making no hay... at least not with me. Nor are the various purveyors of world outrage. So far as I am concerned, they should all be hugn from their necks, or shot, drawn and quartered or whatever because the evil that rampages across the face of the earth rises from all these big talking jackanapes who rape and pillage their ways through careers of grift and murder.


I don't see any issue with that.

And if the people of Massachussetts decided to join Russia and build miltary intallations for them, or perhaps Red China, would you be OK with that as well?

That sort of freedom has become impractical because humanity at large has lost nearly every shred of sanity it may ever have possessed. If you doubt this, you need to start paying attention to the shrieking lunatics demanding the world use their "pronouns". Insignificant, you say? No sir. Indicative.



You have painted Putin a villain and cannot see beyond that

He IS a villain. No worse than the rest, but no better either. He needs to be dragged, living, through the streets of Moscow until all that is left are shreds of his corpse, and I say the very same for every other tyrant on the planet, starting with Biden and working our way down. But that's a pipe dream because even were humanity to liberate itself, it would run right back into the safety of the only thing with which modern man is familiar: rank, murderous, thieving tyranny. Why? Because what is familiar is comfortable, no matter how ghastly. Why do battered women stay with their abusers? Because what's on the other side of the front door scares them more than the next beating. The same can be said of children whose parents beat them and burn their hands on the stove. What is known is less frightening than what is not, right up to one's final breath in their life.

You cannot possibly be peddling the line of shit that says Putin is a righteous man. And so therefore, what are you and a few others here attempting to sell in defending Putin's initiation of all-out warfare on Ukraine?

Or more accurate, western media has painted Putin a villain and you bought it hook line and sinker.

Maybe. But what if you are wrong? Consider the history of Russia of the past 100 years alone. No whit of it has been good. Not a shred. Your assertion implies otherwise, that some humanity exists there that has somehow been disguised as something less noble. Were the gulags a lie? Did my grandfather lie about his four year absenve from the family? Were the scales lying when my grandma weighed him on his return, reading 69 pounds from 200+ (he was a tall and built man)? Has every report of the atrocities of Soviet Russia been a lie? Was Solzhenitsyn lying in the pages of "Gulag Archipelago"? Were the Soviet pilots in Hungary lying when, at the ends of their two year stints there, they committed suicide in preference to returning to Russia, sometimes murdering their entire families as the merciful alternative?

Do regale me with the great and manifold examples of Soviet Russian generosities and how they contributed so endlessly to the betterment of the world. Do that and I will alter my view on the matter at hand. Until then, I stand fast in my view that Putin is a tyrannical swine whose best act today would be to shoot himself through his temple and rid the world of just one more sack of human filth.

Mors Ignorantia.

I think that's "ignorantia mortem", but my Latin sucks, so who knows...
 
Well enough. Now look at it from the other side. What if Crimea decided they wanted to be their own independent land? Do you think for a moment that Russia would allow them to secede?

I don't know. If he's like any other world leader, then secession would be prohibited by all costs. But Russia in many ways is not like other nations. I cannot say.


If Crimea suddenly decided to return to life with Ukraine, would NATO stand within its moral circle to invade for the sake of "liberating" those people? What's good for the goose...

Whatever happened to leaving nation-states to their internal devices, regardless of how ghastly? Has that been formally abandoned? If so, when did that happen? I ask forthrightly because I do not recall it ever having happened. One cannot credibly cry about sovereignty from the one side of their mouths while supporting the violation of sovereignty from the other. You may not like what the Ukrainians are doing to people in Donbass. Perhaps I don't like what is happening in Mexico. Shall we move our tanks into Tijuana on the way to Mexico City?

The right to self determination is the only right that matters. It's the origin of every other right on this Earthly plane. There is no greater cause to defend, and one can make an argument it is the only cause worth defending with violence.


I'm trying to point out all the bullshit here, not to mention the rank hypocrisy of pretty well everybody involved. Biden is scum. Putin is scum. Zelensky is scum. They are ALL scum, are engaging in acts of deeply felonious natures, and the common people are the ones sucking it. This is boiler plate and what do we do about it? Nothing worthy of mention. Anyone painting Putin and Russia as victims is making no hay... at least not with me. Nor are the various purveyors of world outrage. So far as I am concerned, they should all be hugn from their necks, or shot, drawn and quartered or whatever because the evil that rampages across the face of the earth rises from all these big talking jackanapes who rape and pillage their ways through careers of grift and murder.

This is a fair argument. But it's important to consider why these people are scum. With Biden there are obvious reasons. With Zelensky there are good reasons if you have been paying attention. With Putin I don't have much to consider him scum on besides the fact that he's in a position of power. I haven't caught him in any lies. His actions and dialogue over the past many years has always seemed reasonable. He almost certainly is scum, I agree. But I cannot articulate good reasons to describe him as such and so I would refrain from doing so. If you have good reasons of your own - I would be interested to hear. The vast majority of people (hopefully not you) believe he is scum because they believe the lies that they have been told about him.

And if the people of Massachussetts decided to join Russia and build miltary intallations for them, or perhaps Red China, would you be OK with that as well?

If that is their genuine wish, I don't see how I have any right to tell them that they cannot do that.

That sort of freedom has become impractical because humanity at large has lost nearly every shred of sanity it may ever have possessed. If you doubt this, you need to start paying attention to the shrieking lunatics demanding the world use their "pronouns". Insignificant, you say? No sir. Indicative.

Freedom has never been practical, that much I can agree with you. Yet we should still strive for it.



He IS a villain. No worse than the rest, but no better either. He needs to be dragged, living, through the streets of Moscow until all that is left are shreds of his corpse, and I say the very same for every other tyrant on the planet, starting with Biden and working our way down. But that's a pipe dream because even were humanity to liberate itself, it would run right back into the safety of the only thing with which modern man is familiar: rank, murderous, thieving tyranny. Why? Because what is familiar is comfortable, no matter how ghastly. Why do battered women stay with their abusers? Because what's on the other side of the front door scares them more than the next beating. The same can be said of children whose parents beat them and burn their hands on the stove. What is known is less frightening than what is not, right up to one's final breath in their life.

If you maintain this position, all the way down, from Biden to his cabinet members, to the middle management in IRS, CPS, FBI, ATF, etc, to the junior aides that bring them coffee, then I can respect your position.

If you think however that Putin is any more of a tyrant than your average IRS employee.... then either you have good reason to believe (and I am interested to hear), or you have been programmed by western media to think as such.

You cannot possibly be peddling the line of shit that says Putin is a righteous man. And so therefore, what are you and a few others here attempting to sell in defending Putin's initiation of all-out warfare on Ukraine?

I cannot say, I do not know the man. From what I have seen and heard from him as I have observed over the past 20 years, I have not seen him speak or do intentional evil. I cannot say the same for hardly anyone in Washington DC.

He is very likely not righteous and I just have not been properly educated on the subject. But his recent actions in Ukraine are certainly not worthy of condemnation.

Donbass has been suffering genocide for the past 8 years. The west claims this is a lie but it is not. I cannot speak to Putin's motives, but I can say that I am glad that the Donbass people are finally receiving the aid that they have asked for.


Your assertion implies otherwise, that some humanity exists there that has somehow been disguised as something less noble.

It is perhaps a fault of mine, to believe that all people, even evil people, are capable of doing good things, for even the right reasons. There are perhaps some people in this world who are "all bad". I have not met such a person.


Do regale me with the great and manifold examples of Soviet Russian generosities and how they contributed so endlessly to the betterment of the world. Do that and I will alter my view on the matter at hand. Until then, I stand fast in my view that Putin is a tyrannical swine whose best act today would be to shoot himself through his temple and rid the world of just one more sack of human filth.

I try not to judge people based on history from chapters that have long collected dust. Putin is his own person and the weights of other's crimes do not fall on his shoulders.
 
Was Solzhenitsyn lying in the pages of "Gulag Archipelago"?

Nope.

However, I'm sure that he would have definitely been onboard with The Special Military Operation to protect Russia from the New Soviet, aka, NATO, European Union, and the whore, the US.

But don't take my word for it, check out what Solzhenitsyn had to say about Putin:

Here are some quotes of what Solzhenitsyn said about Putin:

"The president knows only too well what incredible difficulties, both domestic and external, he has inherited and which are to be avoided today. I would like to praise the prudence and soundness of his decisions and judgements. At large, he has a quick mind and agile wit and has no lust for personal power, no thrill of power. <…> He really works hard. Hard because the tasks are extremely hard to accomplish." (interview with the Russian television dated September 21, 2000).

"Reverse efforts to save the country’s lost statehood began to be taken under Putin. Some of these attempts however looked rather face-lifting but later they became more rigorous. The foreign policy, bearing in mind our situation and possibilities, is quite reasonable and more foresighted. But in terms of what has been inherited from the predecessors, much is still in shambles. The general situation people are living in is still hard and chaotic." (interview with the Moskovskiye Novosti newspaper dated April 28, 2006).

"Yes, Vladimir Putin used to be a security officer but he was neither a KGB investigator, nor a GULAG camp chief. Notably, international, so to say, external services are dispraised in no country, on the contrary, they are often praised. No one ever upbraided George Bush Sr. for his being CIA director in the past." (interview with Der Spiegel of July 2007).

https://tass.com/society/1070178?utm_source=startpage.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=startpage.com&utm_referrer=startpage.com
 
Nope.

However, I'm sure that he would have definitely been onboard with The Special Military Operation to protect Russia from the New Soviet, aka, NATO, European Union, and the whore, the US.

But don't take my word for it, check out what Solzhenitsyn had to say about Putin:

I cannot claim to know that these things are not true. Were they to prove so, I would not be surprised as I trust neither the EU not America... or Canada, or...

But I do see Putin as having acted precipitously. Was NATO going to attack Russia? Highly unlikely. None of Putin's purported reasons for invading carry so much as a whit of rational validity, so I must conclude that he has acted improperly here. This "defending the people of..." claim is just a steaming pile, even it is a truthful statement, which I suspect it is not.

Putin has no leg on which to stand here. Nor do any of the other parties. This is a circus of international idiocy, perdition, and a danse macabre that has the leader of one of the global superpowers threatening nuclear strikes. Anyone assessing the broader circumstance as anything better than evil at a gallop is nuttier than squirrel poo.

For what it's worth, I'd like to see all parties cut the shit, go back to their homes, and stop acting like ill bred seventh-graders.
 
I don't know. If he's like any other world leader, then secession would be prohibited by all costs. But Russia in many ways is not like other nations. I cannot say.

Chechnya. Brutal barely covers the Russian treatment of people who wanted independence.


The right to self determination is the only right that matters. It's the origin of every other right on this Earthly plane. There is no greater cause to defend, and one can make an argument it is the only cause worth defending with violence.

We agree, and yet "internal affairs" can be said to be part of self-determination. Given my drothers, I'd see every human being on the planet secede from tyranny. But they won't for manifold reasons. And so we are stuck with the cancer that is the "nation state". We could even raise those up to be minimally intrusive in the lives of their respective people, but we don't. Our lives could be like paradises, but they aren't because we choose evil and misery over it. Humans.


This is a fair argument. But it's important to consider why these people are scum.

The mean answer is very simple and easy to understand: human beings are prone to becoming tyrants the moment the means for doing so fall into their hands. It's more predictable than sunrise/sunset or a cesium-fountain clock.

If you have good reasons of your own - I would be interested to hear. The vast majority of people (hopefully not you) believe he is scum because they believe the lies that they have been told about him.

See above.

If that is their genuine wish, I don't see how I have any right to tell them that they cannot do that.

Ideally speaking, sure. Practically speaking, you cannot be serious. The human race has steadily devolved into what I can today only characterize as a raft of apes fallen into deep perceptual disease. The perceptual sphere, or plane if you will, which is to say the environment of common perception, is so degraded as to make one wonder how it is that the human world has not yet flown apart at the seams. The evidence of this is everywhere for one to observe. We have largely abandoned any sense of the sacred, which at one time served to keep men in a mode of self-limitation. Nowadays, about the only thing still considered sacred is the dictates of a man's pecker.



Freedom has never been practical, that much I can agree with you. Yet we should still strive for it.


Freedom is eminently practical, but there's also the normative aspect: that which freedom demands of a man, which are things most people today are solidly unwilling to brook because of inconvenience, too much work, too scary. Especially true of the younger generations, men want to put their dicks anywhere they want, any time, regardless of consent; women want to do the same with their snatches, as if they were entitled. To wit: about 2 years ago I went to The Empty Glass - a bar and music venue in Charleston WV, just to get the hell out of the house. This fairly well put together woman walked past me at one point, stopped, turned to me, said "you're pretty cute", and the next thing I knew her tongue was trying to make it's way to my asshole, via my mouth. Much as I love women and making out, I did not cotton to her forwardly assumption that she could just invade my space like that. The expression on my face let her know that I was not amused, or flattered. She got all pissy and walked away. It is precisely this sort of degeneracy of attitude to which I refer - no respect of one man for another; just one of a great many failings into which we as a body of individuals have fallen and have no apparent desire to correct.

Freedom cannot stand under such conditions and the lowest denominator that is imposed upon all by he who is first to stoop, determines reality for the rest, moving forward. America lowered the bar with nuclear weapons, and now the entire world lives under that threat. The first US company in a sector to move to China forced the hands of all others in that sector because the others would not have been able to survive, had they not followed suit.

And so it has been since we began writing things down for posterity: he who stoops to a new low, lending unto himself a practical power theretofore unknown to men, perforce drags all who do not wish to be consumed into the toilet with him. This is unavoidable, and unringing the bell, so to speak, is virtually impossible. So with every new plunge deeper into the septic tank of human depravity by so much as a single man forces a choice upon the rest of humanity: follow suit or risk becoming someone else's lunch.

Proper human freedom cannot prevail under such conditions, for it requires men rise to a higher level of moral character, and once again I say that far too few hold any interest in such limitations on their individual selves. It's OK for the rest to so limit themselves, and oh yes indeedy they ought to - but I will pass, thankyouverymuch. And so we are mostly hypocrites in the deal, rounding us out very nicely as world class scoundrels, the very much most of us.

Having China parking a gigantic military force literally on our doorstep would be rightly unacceptable, and so MA would have to be denied their wishes for obvious reasons. Does that make the rest of us "good" and "just"? No. it makes us something other than suicidal. It is the lesser evil, but it's still evil. We, the humans of earth, CHOOSE evil and once yet another box belonging to Pandora is opened and the littled wingèd things fly out, there's not retrieving ourselves to the less-tainted state.

For this human condition I have no solution, save the Reset Event whereby out lives, our MINDS, are so deeply disrupted that we forget the bullshit in which we have wallowed ourselves to turn attention to the immediate problems of daily survival. We are not very likely to unzip and whip out our reason and make good use of it. We marinate too much in fear and cowardice and avarice. We are too degenerated in our current states and have no real interest in doing what is needed to pull ourselves out of the fire and start living right. And so here we shall remain until such time as the incentive to change outstrips that to remain on our present trajectory, whose bigger vector component is straight downward.
,

If you maintain this position, all the way down, from Biden to his cabinet members, to the middle management in IRS, CPS, FBI, ATF, etc, to the junior aides that bring them coffee, then I can respect your position.

If you think however that Putin is any more of a tyrant than your average IRS employee.... then either you have good reason to believe (and I am interested to hear), or you have been programmed by western media to think as such.

I think you already know my answer, but just to be crystal clear: I advocate for the physical destruction of ANY tyrant, down to the local dog catcher. The penalty for unamended violation of the rights of another under the imprimatur of "the state" should be met with utter destruction of the guilty party. This is the only restraint that those in such positions will understand and respect. I have asserted this countless times. Anyone in such a position who violates, loses their position instantly and for all time. They are given the opportunity to make restitution. If they fail for ANY reason, including incapacity in spite of a will to make good, the most harsh penalties should await them and their immediate families should face economic wrack and ruin.


It is perhaps a fault of mine, to believe that all people, even evil people, are capable of doing good things, for even the right reasons. There are perhaps some people in this world who are "all bad". I have not met such a person.

That is not fault at all. It is the right belief, which only serves to more resoundingly damn those who do evil: they CHOOSE it. I am 100.1% on board with excusing and even forgiving those who transgress as the result of a verifiable organic condition such as brain lesions. Such people truly cannot help what they do in many cases, but they are also as rare as lips on chickens. Therefore, the vast majority of evildoers choose their acts. That they continue to do evil is pure and reliable indication of what such people are really about. At that point, taking them out behind the chemical shed and putting two in the backs of their skulls seems a most fitting result. None of that is to say it is a joyous thing; far from it, but we either choose proper justice and show respect to the rights of men and hold those who step up to assume the mantle of the public trust to an intolerant standard of comportment, or we are bullshitters who like to talk the fancy speak, but have no real desire to live by our own stated ideals. In the latter case, then I say carry on until we as a species finally and most deservingly extinguish ourselves. Neither the universe nor God shall miss us in the least in that case..

Time to grow up, cut the shit, and start living properly. Few seem interested.


I try not to judge people based on history from chapters that have long collected dust. Putin is his own person and the weights of other's crimes do not fall on his shoulders.

Not entirely on history, but to ignore the record, so to speak, is folly of the first order. Points of history serve as signposts of things for which to keep one's eyes peeled, moving forward. Child molesters are long proven impossible to rehabilitate. Once one gains a taste for that sort of thing, it cannot be expunged because it becomes part of who and what you are.

The man who robs the bank may become a good man in time, but to fail to recognize that which he has done at one time is unsound. The same may be said of the embezzler, the problem drinker, gambler, wife-beater, and do on down the line of all human weaknesses and failings. We all have that potential, but we do not all go out and rape our neighbor's five year old son.

Don't necessarily judge, but certainly be aware of things that have happened because often enough such issues crop up again. This is part of what we are as creatures.

Freedom isn't all bunnies, light, and unicorn poo.
 
Col Macgregor with Judge Nap part 1: The fantasy of Regime Change in Russia



Col Douglas Macgregor with Judge Andrew Napolitano on Judging Freedom on 12APR22. The Judge highlights Col Magregor's predication about the Biden Administration wanting Regime Change in Russia. The Colonel called it nearly a month before President Biden made his recent comments in Poland.

Quote of the clip: "We are more likely to see Putin in charge in a couple of years than we are to see in charge Biden"

The pair discuss Putin's popularity in Russia, but also the diplomatic situation with non-aligned Countries like India.

Colonel Macgregor finishes the discussion with an overview of the divide between Secretary Blinken and General Milley on Ukraine. Let's hope General Milley win the policy argument in the White House.

The entire clip is located here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iavu1MwyIRU

Col Macgregor 12APR22 with Judge Nap part 2 "You're seeing the end right now"



Col Douglas Macgregor with Judge Andrew Napolitano on Judging Freedom on 12APR22. The Judge highlights Col Magregor's predication about the Biden Administration wanting Regime Change in Russia. The Colonel called it nearly a month before President Biden made his recent comments in Poland.

Quote of the clip: "We are more likely to see Putin in charge in a couple of years than we are to see in charge Biden"

The pair discuss Putin's popularity in Russia, but also the diplomatic situation with non-aligned Countries like India.

Colonel Macgregor finishes the discussion with an overview of the divide between Secretary Blinken and General Milley on Ukraine. Let's hope General Milley win the policy argument in the White House.

The entire clip is located here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iavu1MwyIRU
 
Col Macgregor with Judge Nap part 1: The fantasy of Regime Change in Russia





Col Macgregor 12APR22 with Judge Nap part 2 "You're seeing the end right now"


****WARNING: LONG AND POINTLESS RAIL AHEAD. BAIL NOW IF YOU LOVE YOURSELF EVEN A LITTLE****

What does this presentation demonstrate most of all, and in glaring terms? That we are all painted into a corner.

If "we"† give in, the Rapacious Russian gets his way and paves a fine and very broad path for more action that looks a little too suspiciously like a reconstitution of the Soviet Onion. There will be grand parades with much masturbating as Soviet eyes stare dreamily into the distant horizons of the blue future of glory returning.

If Russia gives up, they are through as a "super power" for at least the foreseeable future, and they become a laughing stock. This is the lesser of the evils, if viewed objectively, but Russians will not be rational about it because... well, Russians - or more broadly stated, humans. We are an eminently irrational species, not as matters of capacity, but of will - which is why have been teetering on the brink of self-extinction for the better part of 100 years. And let us face it, chances of dousing the light are better than fair at this point, given everything to which we are subjecting ourselves... like war in Ukraine, my son is really my daughter, and so on.

This circumstance has reduced the general situation to one of a zero-sum. Imagine the utter stupidity of these people, and I mean every last stinking one of them. Those around Putin should shoot him in the head and draw down from Ukraine because Russia as no valid business there, despite the idiot Putin's claims that he's on a mission of mercy. Bull. Shit.

The Brits should similarly put a well placed bullet into the head of their prime minister. Biden should be similarly neutralized, as should the Poles - recalling that Poland was the proximate cause of the outbreak of hostilities in 1939, due to their endless scheming to acquire East Prussia from Germany.

But any given liquidation can only be a necessary condition, but not sufficient. Sufficiency is achieved only when the "leaders" of the relevant nations are all eliminated from the threat pool. But that will never happen because of cowardice, world view, and the manifold other corruptions that are driving the human race toward aut0extinction [sic].

Horrible as the remake of "The Day The Earth Stood Still" was (and it was truly horrible, especially that little bastard), there was a line where the James Hong's character stated to the effect that humans seems to sense they are on the path to annihilation, yet seem unable to do anything about it. That is PRECISELY where we stand. We are so wholly fucked, there is no number large enough to cover it all.

It is almost guaranteed that Russia will never give up on this grand folly, because Russia. Politically, they are asses of the lowest order... Russians are currently acting as the plankton of the asses world. So that leaves the ball in our court. With so much money to be made in war supplies, we will not back off, most likely, leaving us in either a long-term proxy war, or perhaps a short and brutish nuclear exchange where the northern hemisphere is left in a condition nobody with a shred of sense wants to see realized. And there's the problem - few of us retain even that shred. In a world that tells children that boys can be girls, the rational man knows that sanity has left the building. OTOH, to back down would be to give Russia the green light. Mr. Rock, meet Mr. Hardplace. We do this to ourselves every stinking time.

Consider also the position of China. Notice the roar of silence issuing therefrom. They are sitting back, waiting (and hoping) for Russia and the West to exhaust themselves. If perchance those two decide to exchange gifts of the nuclear type, then the die will have been cast and China will have little or nothing to lose my loosing its own stocks at the right moment. If they have any sense about it, they will keep a sharp eye on how it all proceeds, and at closing time they will do one of a couple possible things. If there is a clear winner, which there will not likely be, they cozy up all nice, assuming said winner retains considerable nukes, which likely they will not. But in that case, China makes the best of a very bad situation and preserves itself as best it can, given the sausage-fest.

If there is no clear winner and/or the nuclear stockpiles of the players are gone, China launches a conclusive strike to tie up any loose ends remaining, holding in reserve whatever it is able of their own stocks, and thereafter becoming Global King by dint of the stupidity of their only two real rivals. The world as it would likely stand will not be worth much for a very long year, but the chinks will have survived with a relative aplomb of which the now ash-reduced west could only dream for generations to come. And I would very much bet that China would rapidly fan out across the globe to secure their world-wide hegemony and maintain it with a ferocity to make all former comers pale. The "west" would be kept in stone-age economic trim in perpetuity, if the people of those places were even allowed to continue. This wanders a mite afar, I know, but I could readily see the Chinese embarking on a global campaign to chinkify the entire globe, genociding in the most literal terms every non-Chinese nation on the planet. It would be the smart move - at least in the shorter term - to remove all ethnic diversity and reduce the human species to a monoculture. This is, after all, the globalist vision of the hell on earth for which their little collective winkie stands at attention. Only in this version of it, the European globalist stooges will have been erased from the earth.

This is not as far-fetched as some may think. If things go nuclear, almost anything is possible, and China would love to have the entire globe into which to expand itself. It would no longer be called "earth", but "China". "China" would become synonymous with "earth".

This is the brand of thought-cancer that now threatens all the world. We are a species of little self-propelled sphincters with nary the collective sense of a single boiled turnip.

Theye are all scum. Zelensky, Putin, Biden, and so on down the miserable list of miserable players in the miserable game of miserable human politics who are relentless in their miserable yanking of the tail of a sleeping tiger that, if it ever awakes, is going to serve up a miserable fate that the miserable race of miserable humanity will rue in misery intense such that the dead will be miserably hated for the miserable dregs of our miserable envy of their having escaped the misery of the miserable survivors.

Each of the "super powers" (codespeak for insane political entities with large nuclear forces) seems incapable or unwilling to relent from their endless scheming and plotting and screwing around. As I have mentioned in the past, our rapid advances in technological grasp have not been equalled by similar advances on the emotional plane. In the film "Constantine", Reeves says "God's a kid with an ant farm." Perhaps, but without question it is true of men, only we are toddlers, and of ill-breed, no less. By whatever virtue, we gain and grow our technological levers with no visible growth of our perspectives and attitudes. Indeed, we are in a current fit of rapid regression on those fronts. Those aspects, going in opposing directions with ever advancing velocity, is a combination that perforce cannot be maintained, lest something break, thus all but guaranteeing an artificial reset event that could in theory consume us all. That much is clear as crystal, yet we ignore it in favor of stroking that part of our collective self, back and forth in obscene gesture, whose immediate satisfaction is demanded in fits of spasmodic mental shrieking, which we are apparently disinclined to ignore for the sake of our long-term viability as a species. We are making the bed in which we shall one day lay, perhaps as a race of corpses, all the achievements of the past several millennia having been for naught.

And so it goes. I am fortunate as I slowly grow old, having shed a great deal of my somewhat tense childhood apprehensions of death. But fool that I am, I cannot help feel a terrible pity for the children whose beauty always fills my heart with happy... how they are being gypped of all the wonders that life has to offer - gypped by men of such low character, of zero authority, and hence of zero inherent value as living beings. The injustice of it makes me at times feel as if I am being boiled alive in oil. I just cannot seem to get past my utter refusal to accept the destruction of innocence and beauty. What I would not give of myself to put it all to ends, yet my insufficiency is what reigns, leaving me worthless to the task. And so I write and make an idiot of myself in public; but that is OK because the one thing worse is where I stand idle and silent in the face of the raving and raging evil to which I daily bear witness as it gallops roughshod across the face of the earth, slowly consuming the minds and souls of men. That is something to which I will not accede, not matter how blithering an idiot I may appear to the world as I point it out and vent to no practical good.

So please pardon yet another of my vain and impotent diatribes. I wish I were better than I am, but alas...

Note the unavoidably statistical nature of human existence when populations grow large - we seem unable to help clumping ourselves into sets/groups - what in discrete mathematics would be called "equivalence classes". The unwilling are sucked into the vortices of evil andm angled perception, along with the willing/eager. The nature of things is to drive all to the lowest common perceptual denominator. Things fall apart. Entropy rules the day because we are too lazy and corrupt to fight it to a critical mass. Onesy-twosy doesn't cut that muster.
 
Macgregor on Tucker 22APR22 "What's happening is the final annihilation of Ukraine's best forces"



Quote of the clip: "So I think the sad truth of the matter is that this is a proxy war in which we're sending large numbers of Ukrainians to die without any real hope that will attain anything of importance to them."
 
Regardless of what Putin may or may not be, I don't think it is unreasonable to believe that maybe he and Russia felt backed into a corner after years of (at least partially) manufactured anti-Russia hysteria, not to mention the 2014 coup in Ukraine. This, in conjunction with his personal ambitions, age, and sensing weakness in the illegitimate Biden regime and the West in general, may have all contributed to the decision to invade Ukraine (strike while the iron is hot).

Zelensky signed mid march 2021 a governmental decree for the reconquest of Crimea. Putin started to mass troops because of that.

The American and European public is oblivious of the small details.

All during 2021, the Ukrainian army moved south and east. Zelensky thought that with Biden's support he could solve the donbass conflict.

16th of February of 2022, Ukrainian army started heavy shelling on the 2014 frontline.

Of course its an illegal invasion.. But that's why Putin does not call it a war. Russian's gas still flows through Ukraine. Contracts are still standing. Russia pays Ukraine lots of money for that gas transit.

For those speaking French, there are very good analysis by Eric Dénécé and Jacques Baud who worked for NATO in Ukraine.
 
Those around Putin should shoot him in the head and draw down from Ukraine because Russia as no valid business there

These are words of either cowardice or ignorance. I hope it's the latter.

To say that Russia - as a people - has no valid business in the Donbass, is to say, that it's not a valid use of force to protect your countrymen, your neighbors, from the genocide of literal nazis.

And these are the soldiers motives. Whatever you may think of Putins motives, the soldiers themselves are there to help.

You clearly have a hatred for Putin. Where is your hatred for Zelensky? Who was shelling "his own" people? Who allows his soldiers to torture PoWs? Who allows his soldiers to shoot civilians who refuse to be human shields? Who allows his civilians to beat people to death for the crime of speaking Russian? Who allows his soldiers to capture, torture, and murder anyone who opposes the regime? Who commands civilians to gather at hospitals, schools, train stations, only to bomb them hours later?

Where is your long rants of hatred for him?
 
What kind of sick fuck puts mines on the body of a child they tortured and killed, so his family cannot lay him to rest?

The kind that deserves to die, [MENTION=25257]osan[/MENTION]. The kind that deserves to die.
 
What kind of sick fuck puts mines on the body of a child they tortured and killed, so his family cannot lay him to rest?

Not sick. Evil. The condition of sickness is used to excuse. That of evil is not so easily set to such gymnastics.

The kind that deserves to die, @osan. The kind that deserves to die.

Who has done this?

As for peace, we must be real about such matters: the dead rest peacefully because they are dead. The peace sought by family is not really that of the dead, but of themselves. The peace is that of closure for the living, cold comfort that it may be.
 
These are words of either cowardice or ignorance. I hope it's the latter.

To say that Russia - as a people - has no valid business in the Donbass, is to say, that it's not a valid use of force to protect your countrymen, your neighbors, from the genocide of literal nazis.

So if in the coming 20 years, 30 million Americans (hopefully all progressives) move to Mexico permanently, we would be justified in sending in our troops if the MX "government" were to start treating them poorly, using the same justification of protecting our own?

And these are the soldiers motives. Whatever you may think of Putins motives, the soldiers themselves are there to help.

Motives, which speaks directly to intentions, count for nothing at all. Imagine I were to kidnap you because in my mind I knew you were possessed of demonic entities. Would it be OK because of my good intentions, as I set flame to the pyre upon which the stake to which you are bound is mounted?

Ukraine is Ukraine, not Russia. The moment a Russian leaves Russia to live in Ukraine, he becomes subject of Ukrainian power. It may not be right; it may be the shittiest deal on the planet, but it is the way things are. The Russians have not been particularly kind to Ukrainians, either - so where do they get off, guilty as they have been in the fatal starvation of six million Ukrainians?

What's good for the goose...

You clearly have a hatred for Putin.

Nope. You are throwing "hate" around carelessly. If I hated him, I would concoct a plan to destroy him and execute it. I'm doing no such thing. Calling him out for the dregs that he is, does not perforce connote hatred, nor does my suggestion that the best course of action would be to ventilate his cranial cavity with lead. I'd see Zelensky and the rest see the same sticky end.

Where is your hatred for Zelensky? Who was shelling "his own" people?

I haven made my position on Zelensky abundantly clear in the past, more than once. Hang the bastard until he stops twitching. How many times need I repeat myself?

Who allows his soldiers to torture PoWs? Who allows his soldiers to shoot civilians who refuse to be human shields? Who allows his civilians to beat people to death for the crime of speaking Russian? Who allows his soldiers to capture, torture, and murder anyone who opposes the regime? Who commands civilians to gather at hospitals, schools, train stations, only to bomb them hours later?

You preach to the choir, thinking it's not the choir. What's really going on here?

More than once I have made clear that part of the proper solution would be to bring every relevant world "leader" to a violent end and to make very certain that each deed is televised to the world as a message to all comers. Then you claim I've remained silent. What's the payoff foryou here? I don't see it.
 
Who has done this?

The Ukrainian military. And it was not a 1 time thing. It happens daily.

As far as I'm concerned, anyone is justified in bringing these murderous scum to heel. Russian or otherwise.

I'm not advocating spending anyones tax dollars, but anyone putting an end to these nazi scum lives is morally justified in doing so.
 
The Ukrainian military. And it was not a 1 time thing. It happens daily.

Not surprising.

As far as I'm concerned, anyone is justified in bringing these murderous scum to heel. Russian or otherwise.

And what of national sovereignty? You seem to be tap dancing precariously at the edges of a globalist world view. That is not necessarily bad, but that evaluation turns on the totality of the "globalist" reality of which we speak. The standard for the planet today doesn't cut muster in even the least measure.

I'm not advocating spending anyones tax dollars

Actually, it sounds like you might be.

but anyone putting an end to these nazi scum lives is morally justified in doing so.

How is it that you know this so certainly? That is neither a rhetorical nor a sarcastic question.

How does one put an army to its end without taxpayer heft?

Would Canada or China be justified in moving troops onto American soil for all the lives destroyed by the IRS? How about the damages done by corrupted US courts? Would Zimbabwe stand within its moral right to assassinate Biden for all the carnage he has wrought on the American economy?

What are the rules here - what delimiters? When is it OK to act? When is it not? What are acceptable responses? Who establishes the standards? By what authority? Against what standard are the standards in question established? We could go on for days in this metaphysical fog.

How's about we all just mind our own fookin' business? Nah... too much work, too little drama.
 
So if in the coming 20 years, 30 million Americans (hopefully all progressives) move to Mexico permanently, we would be justified in sending in our troops if the MX "government" were to start treating them poorly, using the same justification of protecting our own?

Aside from the tax is theft part of it - yes. I'm assuming by "treated poorly" you mean the torture and murder of women, children, simply because they are American, then - yes.

If they are genociding Americans, right on our borders, anyone who wants to fight for that cause is morally justified in doing so.

Biden has no right to spend my tax dollars on it. But I'm also not gonna write 5 long winded rants on RPF saying how vile and evil Biden is for starting such a war.



Motives, which speaks directly to intentions, count for nothing at all. Imagine I were to kidnap you because in my mind I knew you were possessed of demonic entities. Would it be OK because of my good intentions, as I set flame to the pyre upon which the stake to which you are bound is mounted?

If you want to make that argument, that motives don't matter, only the result, then fine. The result here is dead nazis. I am good with that.

Ukraine is Ukraine, not Russia. The moment a Russian leaves Russia to live in Ukraine, he becomes subject of Ukrainian power. It may not be right; it may be the shittiest deal on the planet, but it is the way things are.

This is coward talk. You are advocating for giving supreme authority to lines on a map. Because tyrants say so.

They are just lines osan. And these lines are drawn and kept by the tyrants you claim to oppose.

If you do oppose these tyrants, you should take joy when these lines are violated. The lines on the map have no purpose but to keep the cows in their statist designated pastures.

The Russians have not been particularly kind to Ukrainians, either - so where do they get off, guilty as they have been in the fatal starvation of six million Ukrainians?

That was 100 years ago osan. Ukrainians are murdering women and children today. And for the past 8 years.



Nope. You are throwing "hate" around carelessly. If I hated him, I would concoct a plan to destroy him and execute it. I'm doing no such thing. Calling him out for the dregs that he is, does not perforce connote hatred, nor does my suggestion that the best course of action would be to ventilate his cranial cavity with lead. I'd see Zelensky and the rest see the same sticky end.



I haven made my position on Zelensky abundantly clear in the past, more than once. Hang the bastard until he stops twitching. How many times need I repeat myself?

Forgive me if I don't take your words at face value. You have written how many long rants on Putin so far?

How many long rants on Zelensky?
 
And for the record, Russians did not leave Russia to live in Ukraine.

Russians living in Russia were one day told they were Ukrainian.
[MENTION=25257]osan[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top