CO supreme court disqualifies Trump from ballot [SCOTUS overturns]

[Anti Globalist]

 

[69360]

How does that make sense if Trump is currently leading Biden in all the polls?

 

[acptulsa]

How does that make sense if Trump is currently leading Biden in all the polls?

Either these court cases strike down the shenanigans and we settle down--and take all the losses of freedom we just endured--or they do an even more obvious steal, followed by this:

In which case the Army or someone stages a miraculous "coup" and "helps us out" by making him dictator. Problem - reaction - "solution" that doesn't involve the Constitution.

I'm very much afraid it'll be like taking candy from a baby. We can stop it, if we spread the theory around. Yeah, we'll be crackpots again, until we're not--again.

 

[acptulsa]

Meanwhile, on a lighter note...

You have to admit, none of this seems to be affecting Trump's life of luxury one bit.

 

[ClaytonB]

Meanwhile, on a lighter note...

You have to admit, none of this seems to be affecting Trump's life of luxury one bit.

 

[spudea]

CO supreme court is in violation of the US constitution which guarantees republican form of government i.e. the people choose their representatives through democratic elections. CO SC seizing this power for themselves will go down as one of the most shameful cases in US history. Republican states and the Republican party better wise up and quickly call this out for what it is.

 

[TheCount]

CO supreme court is in violation of the US constitution which guarantees republican form of government i.e. the people choose their representatives through democratic elections. CO SC seizing this power for themselves will go down as one of the most shameful cases in US history. Republican states and the Republican party better wise up and quickly call this out for what it is.

Can the people choose a 12 year old president?

 

[acptulsa]

Can the people choose a 12 year old president?

Yes. Trump was first swept into the White House by a tsunami of free publicity in 2017. After they reinstall him and tell us we pulled off a "coup", he'll be in until 2029. You do the math.

And don't tell me about the twenty-second amendment. They're trying to install a dictator. They don't care about the Constitution. And, yes, no matter what he does in 2025-2029, there will still be Swordys and Danny Boys bending over and begging for more.

 

[spudea]

Can the people choose a 12 year old president?

How can you be so obtuse? Is it deliberate?

 

[TheCount]

How can you be so obtuse? Is it deliberate?

How am I being obtuse?

The Constitution sets requirements for being president. Can the people choose a president who does not meet those requirements? Does it violate the Constitution to enforce those requirements?

 

[acptulsa]

How am I being obtuse?

The Constitution sets requirements for being president. Can the people choose a president who does not meet those requirements? Does it violate the Constitution to enforce those requirements?

Be reasonable. If we limited ourselves to voting for people who aren't criminals, we'd have to learn how to vote for people we've never even heard of.

Unpossible.

 

[Philhelm]

Be reasonable. If we limited ourselves to voting for people who aren't criminals, we'd have to learn how to vote for people we've never even heard of.

Unpossible.

I saw Goody acptulsa with the Devil! The Internet is forever, so you're off the ballot.

 

[acptulsa]

... you're off the ballot.

Thank God.

 

[Anti Federalist]

How am I being obtuse?

The Constitution sets requirements for being president. Can the people choose a president who does not meet those requirements? Does it violate the Constitution to enforce those requirements?

Your disqualification is based on an incorrect assumption.

Jan 6 was in no way, shape or form an "insurrection".

It was, at best, an act of civil disobedience.

At worst, an inside job, egged on by fed informers and agents.

And in both cases it was not led or directed by Trump.

The Marxists called it that, their complicit media organs repeated it until the lie became the truth and then the partisan "justice" system in CO acted on it.

But that doesn't change the fact that the initial basis for all of this is based on a lie.

Jan 6 was not an insurrection.

 

[WarriorLiberty]

Your disqualification is based on an incorrect assumption.

Jan 6 was in no way, shape or form an "insurrection".

It was, at best, an act of civil disobedience.

At worst, an inside job, egged on by fed informers and agents.

And in both cases it was not led or directed by Trump.

The Marxists called it that, their complicit media organs repeated it until the lie became the truth and then the partisan "justice" system in CO acted on it.

But that doesn't change the fact that the initial basis for all of this is based on a lie.

Jan 6 was not an insurrection.

An insurrection is what happened to the Ukrainian govt on 2013.
That was an actually insurrection.

An insurrection happens when you have people with weapons, whatever they are bats,shields..

You are right Jan 6 wasn't even close to a insurrection.

 

[Snowball]

ACCELERATE!

1860, Democrats keep Abraham Lincoln off the election Ballot
1861, Civil War

US SC should rule 9-0 to overturn and completely vacate the Colorado SC.

No, that's not what happened.
4 Northern States did not have a ballot for Breckinridge, and 3 did not for both Breckinridge and Bell.
In New York and New Jersey, Douglas had no ballots. Elections were totally different then. There was no private ballot
and also no ballot access procedure. The presidential ballots were organized by parties and were publicly cast before electoral delegation.
The only reason why Lincoln won is that much of the South already decided to secede, and Breckinridge assured it.

He was a spoiler. Douglas would have won if only the South supported him. There would have been no Civil War, or it would have been put off for a while. South Carolina didn't even have the popular vote for POTUS until 1868 (14th Amd). The South only has itself to blame for what happened. They rigged 1860 to separate then they separated and fired on Fort Sumter. They thought they could win. They F'd around and Found out.

 

[TheCount]

Your disqualification is based on an incorrect assumption.

Jan 6 was in no way, shape or form an "insurrection".

You're skipping ahead to step 2. I'm still on step 1:

CO supreme court is in violation of the US constitution which guarantees republican form of government i.e. the people choose their representatives through democratic elections. CO SC seizing this power for themselves will go down as one of the most shameful cases in US history.

Question 1 is whether or not a state court can disqualify a candidate at all.

I would say: seems like yes, otherwise it's not obvious who would enforce a constitutional disqualification like age, origin, etc.

If no one can enforce it then you could have an unconstitutional election result with no clear path back to constitutionality.


What do you think?

 

[CaptUSA]

You're skipping ahead to step 2. I'm still on step 1:

Fuck your bobbing and weaving. We can all see the game you're playing.

 

[TheCount]

Fuck your bobbing and weaving. We can all see the game you're playing.

I'm replying to someone who said that states cannot disqualify candidates and that the people can democratically elect whoever they wish.

Where's the bobbing and weaving?

 

[CaptUSA]

I'm replying to someone who said that states cannot disqualify candidates and that the people can democratically elect whoever they wish.

Where's the bobbing and weaving?

Pathetic.