CNN South Carolina Debate (1/19/12) -- Official Thread!

John King....oh lovely. Isn't that Dana Bash's husband?

Like Blitzer, former head lobbyist for AIPAC, is any better? They all hate RP.

I honestly dont know how RP keeps it together. I'd probably lose my mind if I had to face people day after day knowing they are going to intentionally attack me.
 
Question Suggestion

I think that it is important to force Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum to take a position on the National Defense Authorization Act. I believe that forcing them to give a yes or no answer will help Ron Paul's campaign. I am hoping as many people as possible will submit the following question to http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.co...ns-for-the-next-cnn-debate-in-south-carolina/

Question: This question is about the National Defense Authorization Act. In the previous debate, Mitt Romney said that he would have signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law. Ron Paul has come out against the NDAA. This question is for both Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. As President, would you have signed the National Defense Authorization Act into law as written? I want a DEFINITIVE ANSWER of "Yes, I would have signed it into law as written" or "No, I would have vetoed it". I don't want evasive answers.
 
you know newt is going to go on a rant about the media bias and get the crowd going.
 
Twitter peeps. Make sure you are on Twitter keeping the #cnndebate discussion focused on Ron Paul positives and other candidate negatives.
 
For their "preview" of the debate tonight, they spent 10 mins talking about what Mitt and Newt had to do to win. Paul was mentioned by name just once, in a convo about Newt. They even had a Romney staffer as one of the "analysts".
 
Back
Top