CNN hit piece on now! (tube added)

[nbruno322]

Designed to hurt him with evangelicals. Anyone with a brain knows this. People with brains don't watch television, though.

Exactly..

 

[acptulsa]

Where on earth would the filthy rich, psychotic CEOs for Romney story be, or the brainless chickenhawks for Gingrich story either?

If we're going to have guilt by association, why not a story on how many of Obama's cabinet members are former CEOs of places like Monsanto? I mean, Obama actually chose to associate with these pigs...

 

[nbruno322]

How is this a hit piece?

I think it's great.

It calls for freedom

Its a hit piece because its obviously designed and timed to hurt Paul with social conservatives in South Carolina.

 

[Nastynate]

Not sure about you, and I can't think for anyone else but myself, but I think this is a positive story. First of all it shows you at how all different walks of life supports liberty and their innovative ways in supporting it. Then I think it shows how legalized prostitutes are safe from diseases and are quite well off compared to their illegal prostitutes which have to pretty much fend for themselves and if they are a victim of a crime are hesitant to go to the cops because they were doing illegal actives in the first place. As a lot of people say prohibition doesn't work and prostitution is no different.

I'd rather be getting money from prostitutes than the big banks, should tell you who's side you're working for.

Don't get me wrong either I can see how this is a hit piece but you have no idea if people will see this in a negative manner or a positive one.

 

[No Free Beer]

Its a hit piece because its obviously designed and timed to hurt Paul with social conservatives in South Carolina.

How many "social conservatives" watch CNN?

Not everything is a conspiracy against Ron Paul. You may be right about this one, or the next one. But not every-single-thing is a way to hurt Dr. Paul.

I'm just sayin'

 

[ronpaulforchange]

Not sure about you, and I can't think for anyone else but myself, but I think this is a positive story. First of all it shows you at how all different walks of life supports liberty and their innovative ways in supporting it. Then I think it shows how legalized prostitutes are safe from diseases and are quite well off compared to their illegal prostitutes which have to pretty much fend for themselves and if they are a victim of a crime are hesitant to go to the cops because they were doing illegal actives in the first place. As a lot of people say prohibition doesn't work and prostitution is no different.

I'd rather be getting money from prostitutes than the big banks, should tell you who's side you're working for.

Don't get me wrong either I can see how this is a hit piece but you have no idea if people will see this in a negative manner or a positive one.

I agree with you! I defend the rights of Dennis Hof and the working girls. If nobody else does, that is fine, but I have a big problem with the government trying to control my personal, private sex life. That is way worse than the TSA. The only reason the TSA got attention is because it was a change in policy. I want nothing to do with Ron Paul if he ever supports any political policy that puts a ban on prostitution. If he ever did, it would be a joke to say he stands for liberty. This endorsement makes me more passionate about supporting Paul. I have relatively little desire to appeal to intolerant, bigoted people who want to forcibly control what goes on in my bedroom. Politics works from the bottom up, not the top down. Educate the people and get the real victory. Ron said that many times.