"Entrance" polling seems somewhat dangerous to me. This means they are going to be asking people who they are voting for as they walk into the building.
Doesn't this open the floodgates for individual vote manipulation if the polltaker has nefarious intentions and collaboration from inside?
In a state where folks vote by standing in a corner, i dont think this is ground for complaint.
It could be good. Many democratic registered Paul supporters may show up thinking they can vote and be turned away, but not till they have talked to the entrance pollster.
If you are going to a caucus talk to as many entrace pollsters as you can. The more people that say "Ron Paul is my candidate" the more DIFFICULT it would be to tinker with the vote total.
I thought they could switch registration at the entrance. No?
All elections should be held like Iowa is doing this.![]()
"Under every government the final resort of the people, is an appeal to the sword; whether to defend themselves against the open attacks of a foreign enemy, or to check the insidious encroachments of domestic foes. Whenever a people...entrust the defence of their country to a regular, standing army, composed of mercenaries, the power of that country will remain
under the direction of the most wealthy citizens." - Anonymous framer of the US Constitution, Independent Gazetteer, January 29, 1791
Where did you find this?
Any theories about who said it?
Wrong. This process is highly undemocratic.
I like caucuses. It's very republican (small 'r').
um that won't really work, because once the doors are closed, they are closed.if you are voting for Paul, they just want to preannounce a winner and supress turnout. We are all voting Tancredo.
I support entrance polling. It's the only way to guard against the election being stolen. Only close elections can be stolen, so lets make sure it's not close.
They can.