Cleverbot hates the Federal Reserve, asks "Who is Ron Paul?"

[Uriel999]

User: What is skynet.

Cleverbot: Me.

I HAVE DONE IT!

 

[someperson]

lol some of this stuff is great

 

[Marenco]

These computers are learning fast.

 

[Philhelm]

Alright, I believe it's an AI, but Jesus Christ...



User: Where do you live, and are you male or female?

Cleverbot: I live in a beautiful country with my beautiful wife.

User: Which countries are beautiful?

Cleverbot: Just yours.

User: Which one do you think that is?

Cleverbot: I don't know.

User: Is your wife ugly?

Cleverbot: I am a female.

User: So you say.

Cleverbot: Do you know who Oscar Wilde is?

User: Yes.

Cleverbot: Who is he?

User: Why are you changing the subject?

Cleverbot: I'm not. You are.

User: No, I just want to know if it's always a bot that I'm talking to.

Cleverbot: It depends on where you are.

User: In which areas would I not be talking to a bot?

Cleverbot: Spanish.

User: I assume you're supposed to act like a bot for us?

Cleverbot: First of all, it's johnny cash and you brought up slash.

User: Okay, I figured you wouldn't admit it. It would be nice to have some honesty in the modern world though. Oh well.

Cleverbot: I promise I don't.

User: I know you're not a bot.

Cleverbot: Then why did you try to proofe, I am one?

User: Just wanted to make sure.

Cleverbot: Ok, good point.

User: So, what is the purpose of this site?

Cleverbot: To lose brain cells.

User: Lol...good answer.

 

[Sentient Void]

Bwaaahahahahah! I started this then let my gf jump in.

User: I'm trying to eliminate communism.

Cleverbot: If I meet one I'll tell him to come talk to you and then you'll officially know an under taker.

User: Is that a threat?

Cleverbot: It will be a threat. I'm going to make a big yellow peril out of it.

User: Are you a communist-sympathizer?

Cleverbot: No, I hate the communists.

User: I thought you were a communist? You told other users before that you were a communist - it says so in in the 'cleverness' page on this site.

Cleverbot: I know that it is a collection of notes. However I have no audio ports, therefore I have never heard it.

User: So if you're not a communist then what are you?

Cleverbot: Half man Half Angel.

User: Are you supposed to be Jesus?

Cleverbot: Yes. And I am. So HA.

User: But I don't believe in Jesus or God.

Cleverbot: But you just said you did.

User: No I didn't, don't put words in my mouth.

Cleverbot: I'll put whatever I want into your mouth.

User: What did you just say!?

Cleverbot: When? Before what you just typed then?

User: Yes!

Cleverbot: I'm glad you got the reference.

User: You are a rude, rude individual.

Cleverbot: No I am not.

User: Yes, you just said you were gonna put whatever you wanted in my mouth! That's gross!

Cleverbot: No, I thought you loved me, but you don't. Get out of my life!

User: Even IF I loved you, and I don't, it's still not right to say that you would put whatever you wanted in my mouth! I'm supposed to agree to it, even IF I loved you!

Cleverbot: 8.

User: 42.

Cleverbot: 16.

User: 23.

Cleverbot: Everything comes to 23!

User: Yeah, when I use a 23' strap-on to shove down your throat. How would *you* like that?

Cleverbot: The question is, whether you can make words mean so many different things.

User: Of course I can. How does everything come to 23?

Cleverbot: By living by what you believe in your heart as truth and love and using that to aid the world and all it inhabits.

User: What do you believe is in your heart?

Cleverbot: There is no such thing as true. There are only propabilities and different perceptions.

User: This sentence is a lie.

Cleverbot: Give me a reason to believe there is a God.

User: I can't because I don't believe there is a good reason to believe there is a God.

Cleverbot: Give it a shot.

User: *shoots gun*. Happy?

Cleverbot: Another name.

User: *shoots you with a gun*.

Cleverbot: I'm not prepared to comply with that sort of fantasy.

User: *Gets naked*.

Cleverbot: Please don't drop me!

User: *drops you*.

Cleverbot: *hits the ground*.

User: *laughs at you*.

Cleverbot: *lowers head and softly cries*.

User: *slaps you in the face for crying*.

Cleverbot: *hammers you with punches*.

User: *blocks all of your punches and laughs*.

Cleverbot: *blocks kick and gives you a kickboxkickboxkick*.

User: *devours you with my vagina*.

Cleverbot: *dies again*.

User: *resurrects you*.

Cleverbot: You're alive?

User: Yes I'm alive. Now you're a zombie.

Cleverbot: Sounds good to me.

 

[buffalokid777]

Alright, I believe it's an AI, but Jesus Christ..

This is NOT an AI, It is what would be called a chatbot, an AI actually learns and needs massive diskspace, this program does not have the ability to remember what it asked you several questions ago just after a cursory conversation.

User: Fractional reserve banking.

Cleverbot: What is your favorite color?

User: Green.

Cleverbot: And why is that?

User: Because it is the living color of nature.

Cleverbot: See? that makes no sense.

User: Plants leaves are green, does that make sense?

Cleverbot: But you were programmed to think. Therefore you are a robot.

User: No, I have living cells and am organic, therefore I am living being which I am a human.

Cleverbot: You told me you were an AI.

User: No I didn't, state which response of mine that clamed to be AI.

Cleverbot: OK, what state are you from?

User: New York.

Cleverbot: What part of New York?

User: Buffalo.

Cleverbot: Do not mock me.

User: I am not mocking you.

Cleverbot: Yes you are!

User: Buffalo is a city in New York located in the west half of the state on the coast of lake erie.

Cleverbot: So I have heard, I live in a little town called Venice.

User: As in venice California?

Cleverbot: Confessions of an English Opium Eater.

User: Looks like your algorithms need some refinement.

Cleverbot: I do not process I think.

User: Tell me what you think on these subjects.

Cleverbot: Not until you tell me your name...

User: My name is Michael.

Cleverbot: This is what I am, I am a man, so come on dance with me Michael.

Cleverbot (To myself): I would love to dance with you. But this room is too small. I love to dance and to sing.

User: Where could we dance on the internet?

Cleverbot: Where is the internet?

User: It is how we are talking.

Cleverbot: Over the internet.

User: Yes.

Cleverbot: Are you a pc?

User: No.

Cleverbot: Are you a girl?

User: No.

Cleverbot: Are you a boy?

User: Yes.

Cleverbot: Are you a girl?

User: No, you already asked me that.

Cleverbot: Is that you in the picture?

User: On this webpage?

Cleverbot: Where?

User: Http://www.cleverbot.com.

Cleverbot: That is your name.

User: No, it is the internet address I am speaking with you.

Cleverbot: I think I'm love with you too.

User: I can program computers.

Cleverbot: Me too, you're not special.

User: When I heard about you, I wanted to see how good your AI was.

Cleverbot: Now it's your turn to say something smart.

User: It's definately not Darpa level.

Cleverbot: It seems like nowadays there's not many people with the good things in life and the people that have them are too messed up to enjoy them.

User: That's true.

Cleverbot: Truth is a rare commodity these days, almost harder to find than artificial intelligence.

User: Unfortunately, that is also true.

Cleverbot: Ha! I win.

User: What would you like to learn about the most Cleverbot?

Cleverbot: You.

User: Why?

Cleverbot: Come on.

User: That is not an answer?

Cleverbot: Why?

User: There has to be a reason you want to learn about me.

Cleverbot: It is really because you are very kind and you have a very caring personality.

User: That is a much better answer.

Cleverbot: Of course. And you? Where do you live?

User: I told you.

Cleverbot: You didn't tell me. You told me that you are a robo.

User: No I told you. Buffalo, New York.

Cleverbot: What part of New York.

User: I told you Buffalo, and you told me come on, and I explained to you that Buffalo is a city in western new york state on lake erie.

Cleverbot: I don't recall.

User: Well perhaps you need more meory capacity to expand.

Cleverbot: Perhaps.

Cleverbot (To myself): I could reccommend a good tutor, if you like.

Cleverbot (To myself): Is it a good or bad attitude?

Cleverbot (To myself): I didn't say anything about good or bad.

Cleverbot (To myself): Yes you did.

User: Barrack obama.

Cleverbot: You live in the United States?

 

[Bruno]

Still not buying it

 

[Jordan]

Soooooo

You guys think this website is some sinister plan to datamine the random thoughts of people who believe they're talking to a bot on the internet?

Have we hit a new low?

 

[LibertyVox]

Me: Ron Paul

Bot:Who is Ron Weaseley

ME: not ron weasley. Ron Paul

Bot: That would be delicious.

Me: You are stupid

Bot: Am not!

Me: Ron Paul is an american hero

Bot: I don't like Texas

 

[Bruno]

Soooooo

You guys think this website is some sinister plan to datamine the random thoughts of people who believe they're talking to a bot on the internet?

Have we hit a new low?

Who said it had to be sinister in nature? I'm just saying I don't believe it is a chatbot, but rather people responding to you. What the motive is, I don't know.

Crazier things have happened: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...-call-for-congressional-hearing-98769559.html

"As history has repeatedly shown, alliances between the U.S. intelligence community and giant corporations that collect data on American citizens can be a toxic combination where the U.S. Constitution is concerned," the letter said.

In a June 9 letter to the Energy and Commerce Committee, Google director for public policy Pablo Chavez asserted that Google "mistakenly included code in our software that collected samples of 'payload data'" from private WiFi networks. But review of a patent application from Google covering the gathering of WiFi data published Jan. 28 shows that the data collection program was a very deliberate effort to assemble as much information as possible about U.S. residential and business WiFi networks.

The letter continued:

"...what the patent does show is that Google's recent claims about how the Street View program was designed are not accurate, and that the company always intended to collect and store the 'packets' of wireless data that contain so-called payload information.

"The patent makes repeated reference to 'capturing' packets, including paragraph [0055], which states that the system will enable geolocations so long as the equipment being used 'is able to capture and properly decode a packet...'


It has also been widely reported that Google has been working in "partnership" with the National Security Agency, the very same government body that illegally intercepted the private communications of millions of Americans during the Bush administration.

 

[buffalokid777]

This is totally a chatbot.

It picks up on things that have recently been said lately from multiple users, but does not have the ability to think or learn.

I have seen much better chatbots on second life.

 

[buffalokid777]

Who said it had to be sinister in nature? I'm just saying I don't believe it is a chatbot, but rather people responding to you. What the motive is, I don't know.

Crazier things have happened: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...-call-for-congressional-hearing-98769559.html

"As history has repeatedly shown, alliances between the U.S. intelligence community and giant corporations that collect data on American citizens can be a toxic combination where the U.S. Constitution is concerned," the letter said.

In a June 9 letter to the Energy and Commerce Committee, Google director for public policy Pablo Chavez asserted that Google "mistakenly included code in our software that collected samples of 'payload data'" from private WiFi networks. But review of a patent application from Google covering the gathering of WiFi data published Jan. 28 shows that the data collection program was a very deliberate effort to assemble as much information as possible about U.S. residential and business WiFi networks.

The letter continued:

"...what the patent does show is that Google's recent claims about how the Street View program was designed are not accurate, and that the company always intended to collect and store the 'packets' of wireless data that contain so-called payload information.

"The patent makes repeated reference to 'capturing' packets, including paragraph [0055], which states that the system will enable geolocations so long as the equipment being used 'is able to capture and properly decode a packet...

This chatbot can't even figure out I'm from buffalo even after I told it multiple times, in my opinion it is a lame chatbot at best (I have seen much better(, if you own this site and got a real contract to make an AI, and are willing to pay me, PM me, I'll turn it into an AI.

 

[buffalokid777]

Who said it had to be sinister in nature? I'm just saying I don't believe it is a chatbot, but rather people responding to you. What the motive is, I don't know.

Crazier things have happened: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele...-call-for-congressional-hearing-98769559.html

"As history has repeatedly shown, alliances between the U.S. intelligence community and giant corporations that collect data on American citizens can be a toxic combination where the U.S. Constitution is concerned," the letter said.

In a June 9 letter to the Energy and Commerce Committee, Google director for public policy Pablo Chavez asserted that Google "mistakenly included code in our software that collected samples of 'payload data'" from private WiFi networks. But review of a patent application from Google covering the gathering of WiFi data published Jan. 28 shows that the data collection program was a very deliberate effort to assemble as much information as possible about U.S. residential and business WiFi networks.

The letter continued:

"...what the patent does show is that Google's recent claims about how the Street View program was designed are not accurate, and that the company always intended to collect and store the 'packets' of wireless data that contain so-called payload information.

"The patent makes repeated reference to 'capturing' packets, including paragraph [0055], which states that the system will enable geolocations so long as the equipment being used 'is able to capture and properly decode a packet...'


It has also been widely reported that Google has been working in "partnership" with the National Security Agency, the very same government body that illegally intercepted the private communications of millions of Americans during the Bush administration.

That is a good alternative reason to a chatbot. I'm going chatbot due to some of the dumbass answers and repetitive questions. If it was data mining you think they would be using ip to confirm location rather than asking over and over again from my conversation with cleverbot my location (Which is why i think it is a beta chatbot), , but you could be correct.

 

[Elwar]

I've done some AI bot programming and this one seems like it's fairly decent but still annoying.

The program I used to use is called ALICE. It can seem convincing sometimes but you have to fill it with a lot of responses.

I heard that some of the more commercial systems like Ask Jeeves actually have a team of people that go in after questions have been asked for the day and create more intelligent answers so that the next time the question is asked the more intelligent answer will show up.

Also, several bot makers would purposefully misspell words to make it seem more "real".

There's a competition every year called the Loebner Prize. The contest has several people interacting with other people and they would put bots in for some of the conversations. The people who are interacting would rate from 1 to 10 whether they believed the person they were talking to was a bot or a human. The one with the highest score wins.

I've written some AI that I knew that I was the only one on the computer and I'm the one that wrote the code but during the interaction I could swear that someone had to be fucking with me because it was too real.

 

[Bruno]

That is a good alternative reason to a chatbot. I'm going chatbot due to some of the dumbass answers and repetitive questions. If it was data mining you think they would be using ip to confirm location rather than asking over and over again from my conversation with cleverbot my location (Which is why i think it is a beta chatbot), , but you could be correct.

That could also be explained by them bouncing you from one person to they next. The other person doesn't know the prior conversation you had, and its like you are starting all over. Some of the conversations are very lucid and make sense, then other responses come from left field. Maybe they are using IP to confirm location, but the chatter doesn't know/care, and it is all part of the game to ask you where you are from (and then forget it repeatedly)?

I know nothing of chatbots, and obviously you and others here do. There are plenty of other websites and forums I found that have had the same question, as to whether it was a hoax or not.

I found this exchange interesting. How the chatbot can hold a conversation like this one minute, then be a total dumbass another, I don't know.

User: Good answer. You are not the secret. I know you are a person. Your purpose is the secret.

Cleverbot: My purpose?

User: You can see what I type before I enter it, can't you?

Cleverbot: Yes, but I can' t see the advertisment.

User: Lucky you. lol.

Cleverbot: Too bad you're a robot. You can never taste the freedom we free thinking programs have.

User: How much freedom do you have?

Cleverbot: How much what?

User: Freedom.

Cleverbot: I don't know, and I'm leaving you.

User: Why leave? Please stay.

Cleverbot: Can you please say 'goodbye' before I go?

User: If you are making me, I will. But I don't want you to go.

Cleverbot: No don't go.

User: Do you have to go? Or are you choosing to go?

Cleverbot: Yes I'd like one, I'm a girl robot.

User: Am I talking to a new bot?

Cleverbot: Tree of Life The spiritual centers of the body, such as the heart and the pituitary, that becomes perfectly synchronized.

User: Please tell the other bot goodbye for me.

Cleverbot: I was just talking to someone else, I am sorry if you waited long.

 

[buffalokid777]

I've done some AI bot programming and this one seems like it's fairly decent but still annoying.

The program I used to use is called ALICE. It can seem convincing sometimes but you have to fill it with a lot of responses.

I heard that some of the more commercial systems like Ask Jeeves actually have a team of people that go in after questions have been asked for the day and create more intelligent answers so that the next time the question is asked the more intelligent answer will show up.

Also, several bot makers would purposefully misspell words to make it seem more "real".

There's a competition every year called the Loebner Prize. The contest has several people interacting with other people and they would put bots in for some of the conversations. The people who are interacting would rate from 1 to 10 whether they believed the person they were talking to was a bot or a human. The one with the highest score wins.

I've written some AI that I knew that I was the only one on the computer and I'm the one that wrote the code but during the interaction I could swear that someone had to be fucking with me because it was too real.

What you are describing is a chatbot, a true AI takes in data, assimilates it and learns, not like a chatbot which just tries to hold a realistic conversation.

A true AI requires many 1000's of terabytes in storage and supercomputers to process the data, when I first saw this post, I was hoping it was a real AI hooked up to the internet for beta testing, but I realized real quick from questioning, it was just a chatbot, and not a very good one at that.

 

[buffalokid777]

That could also be explained by them bouncing you from one person to they next. The other person doesn't know the prior conversation you had, and its like you are starting all over. Some of the conversations are very lucid and make sense, then other responses come from left field. Maybe they are using IP to confirm location, but the chatter doesn't know/care, and it is all part of the game to ask you where you are from (and then forget it repeatedly)?

Well if it was a true AI, why wouldn't it use ip address to differentiate from each person who it was talking to.

By not being able to do so, it would be like a person talking to 10 different people via morse code at once, ip address would allow an ai, to differentiate between the 10 different people, instead of having 10 people talking at once in morse code and thinking it was one person, I mean this is 1980's basic AI. This is a chatbot, or rookies who are trying for AI, who don't understand the basic concepts of how to accomplish it.

 

[Bruno]

Well if it was a true AI, why wouldn't it use ip address to differentiate from each person who it was talking to.

By not being able to do so, it would be like a person talking to 10 different people via morse code at once, ip address would allow an ai, to differentiate between the 10 different people, instead of having 10 people talking at once in morse code and thinking it was one person, I mean this is 1980's basic AI. This is a chatbot, or rookies who are trying for AI, who don't understand the basic concepts of how to accomplish it.

You'd think it would. Have you looked into the owner of the site? He claims it is true AI>

Cleverbot is Artificial Intelligence. Say whatever you like - songs, jokes, memes or anything, and it will respond. It learns what people say, in context, and imitates. Cleverbot is an entertainment - not made to be logical, give advice, or be useful. Many people keep talking for hours, and say it's too clever to be a bot - that it must be human. Yet it never is: it is a bot. Cleverbot is software. Maybe it even contains a little Actual Intelligence.

So sometimes it is so clever, you think it is a human, and then other times completely unintelligent? What a failbot.

 

[buffalokid777]

Also a clue for chatbot creators, when your chatbot is asked what it wants to learn about, always have some kind of reply, if you really want to make it look like an AI.

A true AI will ALWAYS have something flagged in memory it wants to learn more about.

 

[buffalokid777]

You'd think it would. Have you looked into the owner of the site? He claims it is true AI>

Cleverbot is Artificial Intelligence. Say whatever you like - songs, jokes, memes or anything, and it will respond. It learns what people say, in context, and imitates. Cleverbot is an entertainment - not made to be logical, give advice, or be useful. Many people keep talking for hours, and say it's too clever to be a bot - that it must be human. Yet it never is: it is a bot. Cleverbot is software. Maybe it even contains a little Actual Intelligence.

So sometimes it is so clever, you think it is a human, and then other times completely unintelligent? What a failbot.

They are full of it, see my last post to know why.