Civil War Breaks Out Over Rand Paul On Fox's 'The Five' (VIDEO)

So they're still talking about terrorists on TV like terrorists are still a thing that exist and still haunt the imagination of the average American?

I got sick of these lies in 2004. The rest of America has seriously been lapping this up for an additional 11 years?

I hear ya. As do a fat chunk of folks here on the Forums.
 
Oh, NO! I started to watch the video but the first thing I saw was Gavin Newsome's ex wife fashion disaster with the trampy purple nail polish, bad lipstick, and bad hair (and what is with the Holloween eye lashes?). Certain to follow with ditzy talking points that Tom Woods could completely vaporize in a matter of seconds.

Not sure I can continue with the video...

UPDATE: Hey Geraldo appears to be on our side right out of the gate. In fact, he lifted Rand Paul's talking points verbatim. He said to the staist guy: "you love the 2nd Amendment, why not the 4th Amendment?" After asking "what's wrong with getting a warrant?"

UPDATE II: Geraldo! My Man! Rand Paul talking points through the entire segment! Even gave Rand multiple props throughout!
 
Last edited:
I really hope the average viewer watching understands she is completely biased Jeb Bush supporter and likely hoping to be his press secretary. She speaks favorably of Rubio since he has no chance of winning the nomination and to help get his name out there for fundraising since he is expected to be his former mentors VP pick (Jeb).

Marco Rubio can not become VP if Jeb Bush is nominated for President. If I recall correctly, there is a restriction from having the VP and POTUS be from the same State.
 
Greg Gutfield is a smug little peckerhead who is ignorant about the Constitution. You know you're stupid when Geraldo has to correct you.
 
I can't believe I'm hearing Fox suggest to GOP voters that giving Hillary the power to spy on average American's is no big deal. They are so beholden to establishment and the police state.

How can people not see this.
 
I can't believe I'm hearing Fox suggest to GOP voters that giving Hillary the power to spy on average American's is no big deal. They are so beholden to establishment and the police state.

How can people not see this.

130 million people voted for Obama or Romney. What does this say to us?
 
Question for RPF: When debating this topic, what is the best way to respond to the claim on the other side, that the SCOTUS already ruled in the 1970s that you don't have a privacy interest in your phone records?
 
Question for RPF: When debating this topic, what is the best way to respond to the claim on the other side, that the SCOTUS already ruled in the 1970s that you don't have a privacy interest in your phone records?

Well if it was a so called conservative I'd remind them that Roe vs. Wade was decided by the supreme court in the 70's as well.
 
I don't know why Gutfeld and that brunette woman lied, repeatedly. They just said things that weren't true.

EDIT: Dana Perino almost made me vomit. What a pathetic display of statist propaganda.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe I'm hearing Fox suggest to GOP voters that giving Hillary the power to spy on average American's is no big deal. They are so beholden to establishment and the police state.

How can people not see this.

Great point!
 
Marco Rubio can not become VP if Jeb Bush is nominated for President. If I recall correctly, there is a restriction from having the VP and POTUS be from the same State.

That didn't stop Dick Cheney. :rolleyes:
 
Quote Originally Posted by Crashland View Post
Question for RPF: When debating this topic, what is the best way to respond to the claim on the other side, that the SCOTUS already ruled in the 1970s that you don't have a privacy interest in your phone records?.

Let Rand answer it for you...

Sen. Rand Paul: Don’t Trust a Lying Government

The justices who dissented in Smith v. Maryland, though, were amazingly prescient and on target. Justice Thurgood Marshall—who disagreed with the opinion of the court—wrote that he didn’t share the assumption that customers would “typically know” that a phone company tracked calls internally—and that even if they did, there’s no way individuals would expect the general public or government to be privy to such records.

Privacy, Justice Marshall argued, is not a “discrete commodity, possessed absolutely or not at all.” Citizens who disclose information to a bank or a phone company with a specific intention for business, Marshall maintained, have a reasonable expectation that this information will not be released to outside entities.
 
Marco Rubio can not become VP if Jeb Bush is nominated for President. If I recall correctly, there is a restriction from having the VP and POTUS be from the same State.

There is no law or regulation preventing a ticket from coming from the same state. It would get a little tricky with the electoral college in a very close election for nominating the VP. If that happened then congress would have to deal with the VP pick. That is if it really got that far without Jeb simply registering to vote in Texas before the election. Considering we overlook things like birth certificates I doubt this would be any issue.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfac.../president-vice-president-same-state-allowed/
 
That is if it really got that far without Jeb simply registering to vote in Texas before the election.

As I pointed out in another thread earlier today (referencing this issue), Jeb just started building a new house in Maine on his family's property.
 
That didn't stop Dick Cheney. :rolleyes:

Dick Cheney has a residence in Wyoming, Dubya lives in Texas, not the same states, though Cheney may have been spending exorbitant amounts of time in Texas at the time, it's not his home state, nor the state he represented when he was a congressman.

For the record, I can't stand Dick Cheney, but we can't be making mistakes like this.
 
Back
Top