Chick-fil-A Vandalized in Torrance, CA ("Tastes Like Hate")

WhistlinDave said:
OK, I did Google them. And they have been labeled by some others as a "Left Wing Hate Group." I guess anybody who hates anybody else's position or opinion can label them as full of hate.
Click to expand...

Ron Paul Invites Neo-Confederate Witness to Testify in Congress http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2011/...-neo-confederate-ties-to-testify-in-congress/

DiLorenzo's response:

What a 'Hate Group' Hates:
A Counterintelligence Report
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo Ph.D. http://dixienet.org/rights/what_a_hate_group_hates.php

More on the SPLC:

Racial Racketeering for Fun and Profit: The Southern Poverty Law Center Scam http://lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo209.html
 
AuH20 said:
I think we need a heterosexual/homosexual summit of some type to clear the air. Both sides should bring their legitimate grievances (because both sides have valid points) to the forefront and hammer something out. I personally don't like when tools like Rick Santorum say being gay is a choice. That's just ridiculous. And I'm not too fond of the homosexual movement pushing into the elementary schools with their provocative sex ed nonsense as well as using the federal government as their hammer of forced compliance. I really wish both sides would stop the escalation and listen to each other. There has to be an amicable solution.
Click to expand...

+REP. I agree!!!!

Maybe if everybody could lay some ground rules so everyone can understand both sides and nobody is infringing each others' rights, we could get somewhere. Excellent post.
 
BamaAla said:
Since when is the Family Research Council a "hate group?" Disagree with a homosexual, black, Jew, or Muslim and all of a sudden you're a fucking hate group; get real.
Click to expand...

I don't know, what are their views on sodomy and obscenity laws? Drug laws? The WTC Mosque?

I'm not a big fan of SPLC but I'm not going to align myself with a religious organization that promotes an anti-freedom agenda worse than teh gheys.
 
WhistlinDave said:
Do you personally know anyone who is gay and who has ever expressed a desire to get married? A friend, family member, even just a friend of a friend? Have you ever had a detailed conversation with anyone in that situation and heard their story, and their feelings about this issue?
Click to expand...

Yes, but I don't believe in legislating things that will expand government just to make endlessly needy people feel good. I'm a fiscal conservative, not a liberal.
 
I find it odd that on an issue that is just about split 50/50 it is controversial for Chick-Fil-A to come out on one side of an issue but not controversial for Oreo to go on the other side of the same issue.
 
angelatc said:
Absolutely. They're horrible people.
Click to expand...

Yet most gays by and large probably don't support their tactics. You'd be surprised how many gay folks who are reserved, low-key and respectful. They don't want to make a huge issue about their sexual preferences, which makes perfect sense. They want to be seen as people who are judged for their merits. I think the gay lobby does an incredible disservice to the gay community by portraying their peer group as militant, inflexible monsters when that is far from the case.
 
Last edited:
BamaAla said:
Since when is the Family Research Council a "hate group?" Disagree with a homosexual, black, Jew, or Muslim and all of a sudden you're a fucking hate group; get real.
Click to expand...

Well, they hate free speech (adult porn and regulating cable - not airwave - broadcasters) and they hate divorce. How preventing, delaying, or raising the cost of divorce is a function of the government is beyond me. Maybe someone can 'splain it.

Counselors are standing by for gubblemint to mandate pre-marital counseling and pre-divorce counseling. Far be it for us to make the wrong decision without their help.

It would be preferable if they were hateful bigots that minded their own business. Likewise with Chick-Fil-A, it'd be better they kick gays out of the store so long as they didn't lobby congress to legislate so-called family values.
 
KingNothing said:
When did I EVER -EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVER- say he should suffer government retribution? All I've said is that his views are obscene, antiquated and stupid, and that as a society we need to better ourselves so that we grow and don't fall victim to such a silly line of thinking.
Click to expand...

You said you agreed with the message of the person that wrote that graffito.

I'm suggesting that what he said is not "hate" by any stretch of the imagination.

And accusing a person of speaking "hate" in today's climate will, under the right circumstances, get you arrested.
 
BlackTerrel said:
I find it odd that on an issue that is just about split 50/50 it is controversial for Chick-Fil-A to come out on one side of an issue but not controversial for Oreo to go on the other side of the same issue.
Click to expand...

Because one side is "correct" and the other side is "incorrect".

Many, many similar issues out there.

Ford Motor Company can contribute millions to anti gun political groups and nobody says a word.

This is progressive, and "correct".

Let a Ford dealer give start giving away rifles as a purchase incentive for new pickups, and all holy hell breaks loose.

This is regressive and "incorrect".

God knows what the fickle winds of public taste, acceptance and propaganda will declare correct and incorrect in the future.
 
QuickZ06 said:
To bad people wont go out of their way to bring our troops back home but will raise arms over chicken to show support of our constitution and the rights we are granted, but not when it comes to unconstitutional wars. Our priorities are really messed up.
Click to expand...

Yes, yes they are.
 
This has always been a peculiar topic here. One side throws out the entire concept of liberty and starts calling the other side hateful for expressing their personal values and beliefs. There is no debate as far as the government action goes because they have no authority to get involved. If a homosexual couple wants to get married then they can find a church or organization that will do it. Then those who do not agree with the church's/organization's actions can boycott/protest/etc. Thats it. End of story unless we as self proclaimed fans of liberty want to criminalize thoughts, values, and beliefs.
 
Brian4Liberty said:
It distracts from real issues, and both sides of the two-headed monster want that. Plus it riles up both sides of the aisle. Democrats were getting a little lazy. They wanted to get them excited about something.
Click to expand...

Here are some real issues

Drug War
The Fed
NATO and UN security council encroachments
Preserving american Sovereignty
Cutting Spending
HR 495
Liberty in out lifetime
Anaheim Martial law
Honest Money
Iran Sanction
Gun Rights
NOT
9/11 Mosque
Gay Marriage
"civil" rights
 
KingNothing said:
When did I EVER -EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVER- say he should suffer government retribution? All I've said is that his views are obscene, antiquated and stupid, and that as a society we need to better ourselves so that we grow and don't fall victim to such a silly line of thinking.
Click to expand...

I like antiques. They are often much more beautiful and well crafted for long term use than all this modern crap.

Rev9
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Voluntarist
Gear Up For Your Next Boycott: Chick-fil-A
Replies
9
Views
742
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Anti Federalist
CA-State Rep Chris Ward introduces bill banning "Hate Flyers, Pamphlets and Litter"
Replies
6
Views
520
PAF
PAF
Anti Federalist
Chick-fil-A CEO urges white people to find strangers, 'shine their shoes' to combat racism
2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
misterx
M
Anti Federalist
Chick-fil-A Grantee Covenant House Hosted Drag Queen Story Hour
Replies
19
Views
3K
enhanced_deficit
E
Anti Federalist
Chick-Fil-A Donates to Extremist Southern Poverty Law Center
Replies
16
Views
2K
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Back
Top