Charlottesville Antifa Steamrolled By Car

Reverse is an option. And it seemed to work just fine for him after he drove into a crowd.

They hit the BACK of his car, the crowd was everywhere.

But you also don't get a lot of time to THINK during those kind of situations.

So the question is, what's your point? Do you think he was waiting for them to hit him so he could drive into the crowd? I think it is more likely he was just reacting out of self preservation. Certainly both are plausible, but I think most people react without thinking too much during these kind of situations.
 
Last edited:
I'll admit that it is POSSIBLE Jason Kessler knew about the law in Virginia, purposely drove into a crowd of Antifa, waited for them to hit his car with something so he could floor it and run a bunch of them over.. BUT... that would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and I haven't seen any evidence. There was motive, and it is worth investigating, but as of now the most likely scenario seems to be that he was just trying to get out of there and feared for his life, got scared and (possibly) over-reacted a bit.

Jason Kessler was not the driver, it was James Alex Fields, Jr..
 
They hit the BACK of his car, the crowd was everywhere.

But you also don't get a lot of time to THINK during those kind of situations.

From my viewing of video there was very little crowd behind the vehicle compared to in front of it. Reverse would have been the best option.
 
They hit the BACK of his car, the crowd was everywhere.

But you also don't get a lot of time to THINK during those kind of situations.

IIRC, the street behind him was relatively clear. He did eventually escape that way. Granted, you might not have a lot of time to think, but my vehicles drive much faster on empty streets rather than plowing through a mass of people.
 
From my viewing of video there was very little crowd behind the vehicle compared to in front of it. Reverse would have been the best option.

When somebody is attacking the back of your car, and you don't have time to think, you would probably drive forward. There were people all around him, more in front of him, but you don't get a very good view from a seat in your car, you just have mirrors.
 
IIRC, the street behind him was relatively clear. He did eventually escape that way. Granted, you might not have a lot of time to think, but my vehicles drive much faster on empty streets rather than plowing through a mass of people.

That's all well and good, but when a group of people attacks a car, and the driver fears for their life, and the driver out of haste and fear makes a bad decision about what action to take, the blame still generally falls on the people attacking the car.

If you worked at a convenience store, and somebody came in to rob the store with a knife, and you got out a gun and they lunge at you and then you shoot at them and the bullet ricochets and hits a customer, the robber is the one who gets blamed for that because they set the events in motion.
 
When somebody is attacking the back of your car, and you don't have time to think, you would probably drive forward. There were people all around him, more in front of him, but you don't get a very good view from a seat in your car, you just have mirrors.

I agree it is not a one size fits all. Every person would not react the same way under pressure. I like reverse and can drive very well in reverse. I think I would have looked to the front then the back and gotten out of there in reverse. But who knows that was a bad place to be! Poor judgement to even be there.
 
A friend of mine was hit in the back of the head pretty badly while we were trying to evacuate. It was very reasonable to fear for your life Saturday if you were alone or in small groups.
 
CNN is Jewish owned so i wasn't surprised by their hatred towards the white people. Remember its "The White's people fault for everything" Its the white people fault for what happened to the Jews.
 
That's all well and good, but when a group of people attacks a car, and the driver fears for their life, and the driver out of haste and fear makes a bad decision about what action to take, the blame still generally falls on the people attacking the car.

If you worked at a convenience store, and somebody came in to rob the store with a knife, and you got out a gun and they lunge at you and then you shoot at them and the bullet ricochets and hits a customer, the robber is the one who gets blamed for that because they set the events in motion.

If you're a cop and you shoot at somebody and hit somebody else it is the person that was shot at that is charged.
 
Who's funding Antifa, anybody good looking hard into that?

Soros https://archive.fo/AC4WM

why is Soros not even arrested yet? You'd think that they'd be able to match the current set of laws with what Soros is doing, there's gotta be overlap.

Conspiracy to riot? Is there a law like that. Time and time again, Soros paid protesters riot. It's intentional. Is that legal?
 
Soros https://archive.fo/AC4WM

why is Soros not even arrested yet? You'd think that they'd be able to match the current set of laws with what Soros is doing, there's gotta be overlap.

Conspiracy to riot? Is there a law like that. Time and time again, Soros paid protesters riot. It's intentional. Is that legal?

Don't forget the New Golden Rule. He has the gold, so he makes the rules.
 
The alt-right continues to be the most idiotic, poorly run, self-sabotaging bunch of morons I've ever seen. Words cannot express how much my opinion of this "movement" has soured since the beginning of the year. My opinions on race and immigration are unchanged and I continue to move rightward, but the alt-right is a $#@!ing dumpster fire that no thinking person should take seriously.

I'm not sure what alt-right is trying to do, but they're not particularly good at it.
 
CNN is Jewish owned so i wasn't surprised by their hatred towards the white people. Remember its "The White's people fault for everything" Its the white people fault for what happened to the Jews.

Why would a publicly jewish owned (I say publicly owned news station) be against the most pro Israel and most jewish president in the history of the US? This is the first president who has all his children(Baron is still too young) married, dating or engaged to jewish people. The first president who has a jewish daughter and jewish grand children in the white house.

If CNN is jewish owned as you say then their objection with him(if that is the case) must not be related to him being against the jews. That or maybe CNN is playing the part of the righteous opposition.
 
Last edited:
Why would publicly a jewish owned (I say publicly owne news station be against the most pro Israel and most jewish president in the history of the US? This is the first president who has all his children(Baron is still too young) married, dating or engaged to jewish people. The first president who has a jewish daughter and jewish grand children in the white house.

If CNN is jewish owned as you say then their objection with him(if that is the case) must not be related to him being against the jews. That or maybe CNN is playing the part of the righteous opposition.

Just look at their narratives.
 
Back
Top