The rules state a plurality of DELEGATES. That's where you're offFive states. How is that wrong? Pluralities are essentially winning.
We have to win five states. We have to achieve a plurality in five states. How is what I said wrong? We haven't achieved a plurality in five states, yet.
What Carl Cameron reported is false. Ron Paul has not yet qualified for the RNC nomination ballot.
Read the attachment to this post.
The rules state a plurality of DELEGATES. That's where you're off
Loved the end of it
Smug Brett "He's still racking up delegates..."
Campaign Carl "He sure is." (said in the tone of Oh man he sure is, and we here at FOX are going to look like jerks when he wins the nomination)![]()
Dude... Is that a screenshot of Wikipedia?
I'm kind of worried about the chaos that will ensue if/after Ron gets the nomination. The talking heads would literally go crazy attacking him and us claiming he caused Obama to win the election etc, etc...
Yes. It is.
Thought we had to win five states?
Have we won five states? No, so, who cares what this guy says?
Great publicity, but the facts are the facts.
If Ron takes the nomination I expect him to win the election, actually. It is the primary that is the tough part for Ron, because his supporters are across the 'spectrum' of parties, and are as much not GOP as GOP.
I like your optimism, but i am wondering what will happen when the billion dollar Obama campaign machine releases its hound, or the Kraken ?
and the media will continue its spin, it will get much worse before getting better.
So should we just give up?I like your optimism, but i am wondering what will happen when the billion dollar Obama campaign machine releases its hound, or the Kraken ?
and the media will continue its spin, it will get much worse before getting better.