Campaign makes TV Ad buy in Rhode Island

PaulSoHard

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
743
They STILL did not dub in cut a trillion 'without cutting social security'. They completely don't get that the New England support is the NDAA galvanized sort, not the cut more sort, without respect to things people have paid in for. It repeatedly confounds me that they don't change this on that ad by voice over. It would be so simple. I live in California and the dynamics are similar here. SO MANY think he wants to cut social security etc that the more he talks about cutting the more they think it is cuts stuff like that, not that he is the ONLY one who prioritizes that while cutting corporate boondoggles and special interest programs. They have thrown away one of his biggest selling points this entire election not hammering that home.
 
Last edited:
Sail --- why don't you hit up Wead on facebook and express this. Perhaps he can pass it up the chain.
 
Why in the world do they keep buying ads in Romney country it's driving me crazy.

The campaign is so focused on the proportional states that it's missing the big kahunas.

This reminds me a lot of Pre-Super Tuesday and Virginia where we spent 0 time and money and almost won but the days prior we wasted our money on proportional states because they can't let go of the "plan."

Just dump the cash into Texas please and finally make a fucking stand against Romney where you're basically going head to head.

If they had done this is Virginia and won the campaign would be in an entirely different place right now.
 
Why in the world do they keep buying ads in Romney country it's driving me crazy.

The campaign is so focused on the proportional states that it's missing the big kahunas.

This reminds me a lot of Pre-Super Tuesday and Virginia where we spent 0 time and money and almost won but the days prior we wasted our money on proportional states because they can't let go of the "plan."

Just dump the cash into Texas please and finally make a fucking stand against Romney where you're basically going head to head.

If they had done this is Virginia and won the campaign would be in an entirely different place right now.

you keep saying Romney country but Maine is RON PAUL country, Vermont he did VERY well in given virtually no spending, NH w/o Huntsman's fake attack ad he would have done even better. It is a different set of issues, but they don't like NDAA and Romney said he'd have signed it. Those people have no where to go.

Not that I don't wish we had more money in Texas, I do. I wish we had more, altogether.

Virginia in the end is a suburb of DC and dependent on government jobs for its economy.
 
Last edited:
you keep saying Romney country but Maine is RON PAUL country, Vermont he did VERY well in given virtually no spending, NH w/o Huntsman's fake attack ad he would have done even better. It is a different set of issues, but they don't like NDAA and Romney said he'd have signed it. Those people have no where to go.

Not that I don't wish we had more money in Texas, I do. I wish we had more, altogether.

Virginia in the end is a suburb of DC and dependent on government jobs for its economy.

Maine (and Vermont and NH) isn't Rhode Island (and Connecticut). I'm not commenting on what Ron Paul is doing in Rhode Island specifically.
 
Why has there been no ads on NDAA? That is an issue many people would be interested in IF they knew about it. Why doesn't the campaign capitalize on this?
 
They STILL did not dub in cut a trillion 'without cutting social security'. They completely don't get that the New England support is the NDAA galvanized sort, not the cut more sort, without respect to things people have paid in for. It repeatedly confounds me that they don't change this on that ad by voice over. It would be so simple. I live in California and the dynamics are similar here. SO MANY think he wants to cut social security etc that the more he talks about cutting the more they think it is cuts stuff like that, not that he is the ONLY one who prioritizes that while cutting corporate boondoggles and special interest programs. They have thrown away one of his biggest selling points this entire election not hammering that home.

yes... i dont know wtf is the campaign doing. i think they had weeks to edit in a social security/medicare part. and i am sure we made it known to the campaign, at least to his advisors, to add these things.
 
and he did VERY well in neighboring states.

Only mass voted so far and Romney blew it out as expected.

RI is a whole different world from ME, NH and VT it's basically MA/CT.

I'm sure Romney is going to have a blowout win in RI.
 
Last edited:
Only mass voted so far and Romney blew it out as expected.

RI is a whole different world from ME, NH and VT it's basically MA/CT.

I'm sure Romney is going to have a blowout win in RI.

You could be right, but NH, ME and VT are close enough that with an open primary and a less expensive media market I think it could be worth some cable ads. Mind you I'm assuming their information supports that.
 
Why in the world do they keep buying ads in Romney country it's driving me crazy.

The campaign is so focused on the proportional states that it's missing the big kahunas.

This reminds me a lot of Pre-Super Tuesday and Virginia where we spent 0 time and money and almost won but the days prior we wasted our money on proportional states because they can't let go of the "plan."

Just dump the cash into Texas please and finally make a fucking stand against Romney where you're basically going head to head.

If they had done this is Virginia and won the campaign would be in an entirely different place right now.
because people hate romney up here Ron has a good chance ofdoing something here
 
Makes perfect sense. Having blown through most of the money raised you have to choose and pick your battles carefully..
 
Back
Top