Cameron muttering

While I think Fox has a lot of assholes working for them, I think some may want to be legitimate journalists and may struggle with the neocon editorial/producer control. I think Cameron might be one of them.

No, Carl Cameron takes every opportunity possilbe to make Ron Paul, and all his supporters seem like loons. His film crew was doing a short story on what it's like to be on the campaign trail, and they have Mr. Pencil Neck on tape walking in and saying in an Elmer Fudd immitation ..."Be vewy vewy quiet, we're hunting Ron Paulites."

He was just a two faced jerk when talking to RP one on one in that single interview he did wherein he treated him somewhat fairly, and everyone thought that maybe something at Fox changed. It hasn't. Theyall are NEOCON types, whose favorite past time is to start crap, like the little Eddie Haskells you knew back in Jr. High Schoool. They do things like Hey, I know what. How about let's you and him fight?
 
He was just a two faced jerk when talking to RP one on one in that single interview he did wherein he treated him somewhat fairly,

People are customarily 2faced when face-to-face, especially when they're on someone else's turf, which was the case with the "friendly" Cameron interview. Cameron is a chameleon, a snake with legs.
 
I think hes getting his orders from upstairs, i dont think he wanted to ask that question. But he values his job more than freedom of speech, so it goes for the rest of the MSM pundits.
 
Wow! This is really strange and creepy. We need to get this out there. We need those We Are Change guys to nail Cameron on this.

WTF?:confused:
 
Caution here...he was also trying to get Ron Paul to say Fox was fair to him in that backstage interview.

Cameron is sometimes the good cop and sometimes the bad cop.

They swap some of these guys around so much that way, it is difficult to tell what they really think.
 
Last edited:
He probably know we were going to explode over the question and overanalyze it and was hoping to justify his actions by reminding us that Fox controlled the debate.

All this "mind control" crap is horse shit.
 
Come on guys. I'm a 9/11 truther and even I don't see anything subliminal about this.

He was stuttering trying to word the question. Maybe it wasn't even "their way", maybe he was about to say it a little differently, and in his head at the last second he decided to word it the way he did.

Maybe he was about to say "there were..." and then elaborate further, but instead decided as he was starting to say it, to just shorten it up and come out and say "do you have any?".

Everyone in here has done this exact same thing.

You've never started to say something, and then in mid statement, say something completely different?
 
Come on guys. I'm a 9/11 truther and even I don't see anything subliminal about this.

He was stuttering trying to word the question. Maybe it wasn't even "their way", maybe he was about to say it a little differently, and in his head at the last second he decided to word it the way he did.

Maybe he was about to say "there were..." and then elaborate further, but instead decided as he was starting to say it, to just shorten it up and come out and say "do you have any?".

Everyone in here has done this exact same thing.

You've never started to say something, and then in mid statement, say something completely different?


Cmon guys, when the Truthers are saying you're looking too far into it, you really have to go take a break and eat a popsicle or something.
 
Did you notice him sit bolt upright in his chair just as he began to ask the question? Freaky. Reminds me of what happens to mediums when they let a foreign spirit speak through them. But Carl was not intentional about any of this behavior, probably largely oblivious to it.
 
Did you notice him sit bolt upright in his chair just as he began to ask the question? Freaky. Reminds me of what happens to mediums when they let a foreign spirit speak through them. But Carl was not intentional about any of this behavior, probably largely oblivious to it.

Tell me then. Why would they need to execute mind control over him to get him to ask a question that a whole slew of other fox news employees would have gladly asked on their own?

I don't see that from Goler. I don't see Wallace acting freaky when he talks. We all know O'Reilly would GLADLY ask that question without having to be mind controlled.

Or are they ALL mind controlled?
 
Tell me then. Why would they need to execute mind control over him to get him to ask a question that a whole slew of other fox news employees would have gladly asked on their own?

I don't see that from Goler. I don't see Wallace acting freaky when he talks. We all know O'Reilly would GLADLY ask that question without having to be mind controlled.

Or are they ALL mind controlled?

It is not mind control. It is subtle influence about how to phrase the question. You can see Carl pausing to construct the question and during that moment of inner deliberation these odd physical actions take place. Watch and listen and think what you will. I am not suggesting total control. I think there was a suggestive pressure toward him to mock and ridicule.
 
It is not mind control. It is subtle influence about how to phrase the question. You can see Carl pausing to construct the question and during that moment of inner deliberation these odd physical actions take place. Watch and listen and think what you will. I am not suggesting total control. I think there was a suggestive pressure toward him to mock and ridicule.

From WHERE though. And how?

An earpiece? Electric shock? WHAT?

I don't understand what you're trying to say. You're suggesting his speech was in some way controlled to make him phrase it like he did, and I'm wondering how exactly you think that was accomplished.

Why can't it just be indecisive speeking on his part? Isn't it easier to just admit that people do this all the time, and that he just stumbled over what words to finally use?
 
From WHERE though. And how?

An earpiece? Electric shock? WHAT?

I don't understand what you're trying to say. You're suggesting his speech was in some way controlled to make him phrase it like he did, and I'm wondering how exactly you think that was accomplished.

Why can't it just be indecisive speeking on his part? Isn't it easier to just admit that people do this all the time, and that he just stumbled over what words to finally use?

I'm suggesting he was the target of some spiritual influencing. Perhaps it was the latent attitude of the crowd, thick with ridiculing contempt which dumped on him since he was the person everyone was listening to at the moment. I am not saying anyone is being controlled. It is influence. I'm no expert on such matters and do not wish to be.
 
That is pretty odd. I won't go as far as to say its definitely "their way" though. Sounds kinda like he doesnt know how to phrase the question. The part that stood out to me more was the "general" slip up. Killing two birds with one stone by saying general, as in general election, and then the nomination part. Implying that even if RP wins the nomination he wouldnt win the general election.

Also, I agree with whoever brought up the sound bite of the laughing. The camera switches to RP away from Cameron as soon as he says that and the laughs start. I bet the people behind Cameron weren't laughing so it would have ruined the stunt. RP's smirk was great though...like he knew they just tee'd it up for him.
 
:D

Has anyone tried playing it backwards?:rolleyes:


lol ya, I did just for fun. when played "their way" backwards it said "government". when played backwards that part of divorcing from 911 truthers it said "slit throat" :eek: :D not sure how much there is to this but its fun.
 
I remember this as well.

Carl Cameron was the reporter at Fox that did the story on Israel spying on the US and getting caught...maybe he is starting to "come around" to Ron Paul and agrees with him on foreign policy?
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7545.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo

His series of reports (introduced by Britt Hume) was quickly withdrawn from the Fox website. What Cameron reported was corroborated by the Jewish magazine, The Forward.

I don't think Cameron is a clandestine Paul supporter. I think he has been reminded what is off-limits.

The thing with the tongue is weird. Could just be dry mouth.
 
It's hard to believe the hubris of these "journalists" asking questions of a presidential candidate in such a crass and disrespectful tone.
 
Back
Top