California Declares War On Family Homes to ‘Save the Planet’

Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
13,839
California Declares War On Family Homes to ‘Save the Planet’

California Declares War On Family Homes to ‘Save the Planet’

Detached houses virtually “illegal” under global warming laws

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Tuesday, April 10, 2012

The state of California has declared war on detached family homes, with laws passed to mitigate car use and carbon dioxide emissions now leading to policies that mandate up to 30 homes be built on a single acre of land, fulfilling the goal of climate change alarmists to pack people into densely populated prison cities.

(video here in original article)

“Metropolitan area governments are adopting plans that would require most new housing to be built at 20 or more to the acre, which is at least five times the traditional quarter acre per house. State and regional planners also seek to radically restructure urban areas, forcing much of the new hyperdensity development into narrowly confined corridors,” reports the Wall Street Journal.

In some areas of Los Angeles County and five other Southern California counties, 30 housing units per acre are being mandated, all under the auspices of laws passed in the name of cutting car use and limiting CO2 emissions, including the 2006 Global Warming Solutions Act and the 2008 Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act.

The rules on restricted development are driving up house prices and driving down standards of living. Even if you believe the justification of lowering greenhouse gases, the regulations won’t even achieve that, with greater traffic congestion merely confined to overpopulated cities as additional houses continue to use cars.

Transportation consultant Wendell Cox told the WSJ that the whole process represented an effort to make the construction of detached houses “illegal”.

This is all part of the United Nations’ Agenda 21 project which demands that member nations adopt “sustainable development” policies that are little more than a disguise for the reintroduction of neo-feudalism and only serve to reduce living standards and quality of life.

The true motivation behind this agenda was recently unveiled at the ‘Planet Under Pressure’ conference in London, during which climate change alarmists presented their blueprint for humans to be packed into denser cities (eco-gulags?) so that the rest of the planet can be surrendered to mother nature. It’s a similar idea to the nightmare ‘Planned-Opolis’ proposal put out by the Forum for the Future organization last year, in which human activity will be tightly regulated by a dictatorial technocracy in the name of saving the planet, with cars for personal use banned and only accessible to members of the elite.

The mindset of this gaggle of arrogant, scoffing elitists in their drive to micro-manage the human race, which they regard as a plague on the earth, was best encapsulated by the following quote from ‘Planet Under Pressure’ attendee and Yale University professor Karen Seto.

“We certainly don’t want them (humans) strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together],” Seto told MSNBC.

Also making an appearance at the conference was none other than Professor Kari Norgaard, who published a paper calling for global warming skeptics to be “treated” for having a mental disorder, likening them to racists.

Despite academic establishments Norgaard is involved with hastily rushing to delete and alter information concerning her paper and biography, a letter Norgaard wrote to President Obama soon emerged in which she urged Obama to suspend democracy and push through dictatorial climate change mandates by executive fiat.

That process is already well underway in California.


original article here:
http://www.infowars.com/california-declares-war-on-family-homes-to-save-the-planet/
 
Not all of CA is in metropolitan areas, but still very interesting.
 
No. Do you get paid to troll?

Oooh oooh! I do I do! And if you order right now, you'll get this brand new Free Dishwasher that the NSA can use to Spy on you!

---

The War on <Insert Subject Here>

Yeah, lets wrap this up as quick as we can. How well is that War on Drugs workin out for us?
 
Do you get paid to post the AJ stuff here?

Do you really think AJ has it so well off that he can just pay people to spread his propaganda? He's doing this because he believes in it. The fact that you seem so opposed to any suggestion that there could be a conspiracy just suggests to me that you are a victim of media propaganda.

ETA: I knew this was a part of Agenda 21. You can't deny that Agenda 21 is real, angelatc. Do you doubt that?

They even have a map of restricted areas for humans. The quote in the article, "We certainly don't want them strolling all over the countryside", is very telling. Why the hell wouldn't I be able to stroll all over the countryside if I damn well please? What's worse is that he says it as if it's common knowledge that we should regulate where people can go and that we should even have a reason to want them to stay out of certain places. I don't see any reason in that.

The world is going to hell in a handbasket really fast. Sometimes it just amazes me how blind the skeptics can be.
 
Last edited:
Not all of CA is in metropolitan areas, but still very interesting.

Once they've separated the "meat and potatoes" of society from the rest of us, it will make it that much easier for them to regulate the country-dwellers out of existence.
 
Very interesting, seems cali is UN's little test experiment in the U.S.

And whats up with angelic? Why the hate?
 
Last edited:
Do you really think AJ has it so well off that he can just pay people to spread his propaganda? He's doing this because he believes in it. The fact that you seem so opposed to any suggestion that there could be a conspiracy just suggests to me that you are a victim of media propaganda.

ETA: I knew this was a part of Agenda 21. You can't deny that Agenda 21 is real, angelatc. Do you doubt that?

They even have a map of restricted areas for humans. The quote in the article, "We certainly don't want them strolling all over the countryside", is very telling. Why the hell wouldn't I be able to stroll all over the countryside if I damn well please? What's worse is that he says it as if it's common knowledge that we should regulate where people can go and that we should even have a reason to want them to stay out of certain places. I don't see any reason in that.

The world is going to hell in a handbasket really fast. Sometimes it just amazes me how blind the skeptics can be.

+ fucking rep!
 
Alex Jones haters don't make sense. Even if she gives you an answer, it won't be a logical one.

You ought to settle down. Angela has been here and been working in this movement for years, she's contributed quite a lot and you've done what? Posted a lot of AJ articles?

Not everyone here likes or respects him. Some for good reason, others for blindly accepting that he's a sensationalist or other reasons. You don't know why she isn't a fan, and maybe she's right not to be. Many here were once fans of Glenn Beck and he turned out to be a total shithead, while many here were reamed out for criticizing an "ally."
 
Pretty scary if that article is true. I would hate to think the whole USA adopting something similar. I don't want to live like that. That is the reason I don't live down town in a city. I would rather live in the suburbs. I love driving my car too. We need to get out of the UN if they try to make us do this.
 
You ought to settle down. Angela has been here and been working in this movement for years, she's contributed quite a lot and you've done what? Posted a lot of AJ articles?

Not everyone here likes or respects him. Some for good reason, others for blindly accepting that he's a sensationalist or other reasons. You don't know why she isn't a fan, and maybe she's right not to be. Many here were once fans of Glenn Beck and he turned out to be a total shithead, while many here were reamed out for criticizing an "ally."

Lol wow. All I've done for the movement is post articles?

I give in. I'm just going to start putting people on ignore instead of saying anything to them at all. That's the best route anyway.
 
Lol wow. All I've done for the movement is post articles?

I give in. I'm just going to start putting people on ignore instead of saying anything to them at all. That's the best route anyway.

So far as I know, that's all you've done. I've been in the e-trenches and Angela has been there through thick and thin for years--why would you ignore that and write her off in such a manner?

Where were you in 2008?
 
A man from Idaho called into the Mark Levin show yesterday ( I believe it was Levins show - i do still listen to him despite his nastiness about RP cos he is on at supper time and I like how he shreds Pres O apart lol). But anyway, the man said he moved from California to Idaho to get away from all of that stuff, but the same thing is happening in his region. He said he has spent 9 months so far trying to get a permit to build a barn on his own acreage and has spent *i think* about $3000 and has yet to even get a permit issued let alone anything else. He was talking about the same issue - 20 homes to an acre and how he has no idea if he will ever be able to build this barn or what they expect him to do. He said they are trying to drive people out of the sticks and into the cities. It is frightful really. I live in an area that is city surrounded by a huge expanse of rural (next cities are 2 hours and 3 hours away in any direction) and our hope/dream is to one day move out of town onto a small acreage. Will we get to do that in 20 years? I have no idea. I see things up here in Canada too like reports on one our largest ground-coverage cities, Calgary, and how people have to drive 'so far' to get to parks, work, etc and spew carbon emissions the whole way. It is considered 'a problem'. OMFG.

Years ago, it was considered bad to have a concrete jungle, so cities had to strategically place parks and green space, save certain natural areas from destruction and turn them into protected areas within a city, and now 30 years later, we are getting heck from the SAME environmentalists because it takes longer to drive everywhere now. It is unbelieveable.
 
You ought to settle down. Angela has been here and been working in this movement for years, she's contributed quite a lot and you've done what? Posted a lot of AJ articles?

Not everyone here likes or respects him. Some for good reason, others for blindly accepting that he's a sensationalist or other reasons. You don't know why she isn't a fan, and maybe she's right not to be. Many here were once fans of Glenn Beck and he turned out to be a total shithead, while many here were reamed out for criticizing an "ally."

I looks like Angela should have just not said anything and let this person post a topic in general politics like they did.
It is a general politics issue.
 
So far as I know, that's all you've done. I've been in the e-trenches and Angela has been there through thick and thin for years--why would you ignore that and write her off in such a manner?

Where were you in 2008?

Who cares where he was in 08, he is supporting liberty and Ron Paul RIGHT NOW. Angelic came in with the hate first and it was unnecessary, period. If you do not like AJ then then do not click or comment on a link. Really simple, especially for liberty mined folks such as ourselves.
 
Last edited:
Who cares where he was in 08, he is supporting liberty and Ron Paul RIGHT NOW. Angelic came in with the hate first and it was unnecessary, period. If you do not like AJ then then do not click or comment on a link. Really simple, especially for liberty mined folks such as ourselves.

I care. Angela might be caustic at times, but she's proven herself time and time again as someone who will stick to it. Has JFKIII?

Alex Jones is polarizing, and if you can't see that, then I can see why you're angry. Personally, I don't care one way or another about AJ. I think he can be a sensationalist, and I think that he puts the truth out there when other outlets aren't willing to. He's a wash.
 
Hey Amy, long time no see.

I moved into a forest a while ago, what's new with you?
 
Back
Top